Bernie Sanders does not understand economics

The last five recessions have been on Republican watches.

You never explained what they did to cause these recessions. Be specific.

why should I have to. Point is, you guys get in charge, we get recessions. And frankly, I was limiting myself to just my lifetime.

When I was growing up in the 1970's, my parents commented that Republicans brought us recessions and Democrats brought us war.

Now Republicans bring us BOTH.

Me, I like peace and prosperity. I don't care if gays are getting married or the president is laying pipe in some intern.

why should I have to.

To prove your claim.
You're kidding, right? Joe has never proven anything other than that he's stupid and envious. IN his narrative every problem is caused by Republicans. And the more you press him the more absurd the claims become.

Also, Jews. Don't forget the Jews.

A few Jews were mean to his mom 30 years ago, and he's had a pathological hated of every single one of them since.


Wait, did I say "Jews?" I meant to say "Mormons."
 
For a candidate who "doesn't have a chance," he sure is striking fear in the hearts of those who are fixated on the word "socialist" without understanding what it means...

Commenting on how ridiculous his statements and proposals are isn't "fear"; it's just being observant.

But when asked to observe what it is in his 30-year tenure in Congress that indicates an ignorance of economics, y'all scream "SOCIALISM!!!11" and run away. :dunno:
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply and velocity acting as a deflationary pressure which reduces jobs created or consumption by the lower waged.
 
For a candidate who "doesn't have a chance," he sure is striking fear in the hearts of those who are fixated on the word "socialist" without understanding what it means...

Commenting on how ridiculous his statements and proposals are isn't "fear"; it's just being observant.

But when asked to observe what it is in his 30-year tenure in Congress that indicates an ignorance of economics, y'all scream "SOCIALISM!!!11" and run away. :dunno:
No actually we point out "socialism" and then point out his tweet like the OP and his articles in the WSJ. And you ignore all of that and continue with your stupid narrative oblivious of facts.
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply and velocity acting as a deflationary pressure which reduces jobs created or consumption by the lower waged.
LOL!! You have NO FUCKING CLUE what you are talking about. Just hysterical.
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply and velocity acting as a deflationary pressure which reduces jobs created or consumption by the lower waged.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply

You mean they buy a muni bond? A bond that raises money to build infrastructure?
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply and velocity acting as a deflationary pressure which reduces jobs created or consumption by the lower waged.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply

You mean they buy a muni bond? A bond that raises money to build infrastructure?
See, libs are so fucking clueless they believe crap like this. That the wealthy keep their money in off shore accounts that just sit in cash in a bank vault. At the same time they believe the wealthy are incredibly greedy. So they are incredibly greedy but stupid enough to kepp their money in instruments that wont make them any money.
Yes they believe this.
 
Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply and velocity acting as a deflationary pressure which reduces jobs created or consumption by the lower waged.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply

You mean they buy a muni bond? A bond that raises money to build infrastructure?
See, libs are so fucking clueless they believe crap like this. That the wealthy keep their money in off shore accounts that just sit in cash in a bank vault. At the same time they believe the wealthy are incredibly greedy. So they are incredibly greedy but stupid enough to kepp their money in instruments that wont make them any money.
Yes they believe this.

Their conflicting beliefs are humorous.
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

The wealthy don't order gin and tonics.

They are ordering fine wines, scotch, bourbons, cognacs and armangacs.
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply and velocity acting as a deflationary pressure which reduces jobs created or consumption by the lower waged.

Er, no.
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

The wealthy don't order gin and tonics.

They are ordering fine wines, scotch, bourbons, cognacs and armangacs.
Yeah but in the summer its difference.
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

They actually do. Most wealth owned by the wealthy is not invested in capital infrastructure that creates jobs, but is invested in interests that withdraw payments from money supply and velocity acting as a deflationary pressure which reduces jobs created or consumption by the lower waged.

Er, no.
Isnt it incredible that someone can actually post that and think they are saying something true? Where do they teach this stuff??
 
He does understand how the greatest country on earth(so some say) poo poos the working class guy so the wealthy can run the show.

Without the wealthy, there is NO SHOW, dumbass!
Boy you're a duped IDIOT.
No actually you were You probably believe the wealthy just sit around with money stuffed in mattresses ordering gin and tonics.

The wealthy don't order gin and tonics.

They are ordering fine wines, scotch, bourbons, cognacs and armangacs.
Yeah but in the summer its difference.

That's when they have a lackey they pay $2 a day to carry a huge block of ice on their backs for a mile so they can make their $1200 scotch cold.
 
For a candidate who "doesn't have a chance," he sure is striking fear in the hearts of those who are fixated on the word "socialist" without understanding what it means...
Fear? No you mistake amusement for fear. No one is afraid of Bernie Sanders. Except the DNC, which is trying to shut him out of the primaries.

Well, the DNC are the only ones who NEED to fear him.
This is true. The heir apparent was knocked off last time by an unqualified community organizer. They can't afford a repeat.
 
Well we see why Republicans end up with recessions/depressions, they can't figure out what causes them, much less what to do about them.

Clinton left us with a recession and then the economy flourished under bush. O took over a recession and the economy never has fully recovered.
This is true. The narrative is, "It was just so terrible that he couldn't possibly fix it in <insert lengthy amount of time here>", then the moment the Republican is inaugurated in '17, it will be as if the intervening years never happened and they will demand an instant fix.
 
For a candidate who "doesn't have a chance," he sure is striking fear in the hearts of those who are fixated on the word "socialist" without understanding what it means...

Commenting on how ridiculous his statements and proposals are isn't "fear"; it's just being observant.

But when asked to observe what it is in his 30-year tenure in Congress that indicates an ignorance of economics, y'all scream "SOCIALISM!!!11" and run away. :dunno:
No actually we point out "socialism" and then point out his tweet like the OP and his articles in the WSJ. And you ignore all of that and continue with your stupid narrative oblivious of facts.

As I say, obsessed with a Magical Word and a single tweet. Carry on.
 
Well we see why Republicans end up with recessions/depressions, they can't figure out what causes them, much less what to do about them.

Clinton left us with a recession and then the economy flourished under bush. O took over a recession and the economy never has fully recovered.
This is true. The narrative is, "It was just so terrible that he couldn't possibly fix it in <insert lengthy amount of time here>", then the moment the Republican is inaugurated in '17, it will be as if the intervening years never happened and they will demand an instant fix.
Bush was so stupid he fucked everything up and Obama is so smart he couldnt fix it in 8 years.
 
For a candidate who "doesn't have a chance," he sure is striking fear in the hearts of those who are fixated on the word "socialist" without understanding what it means...

Commenting on how ridiculous his statements and proposals are isn't "fear"; it's just being observant.

But when asked to observe what it is in his 30-year tenure in Congress that indicates an ignorance of economics, y'all scream "SOCIALISM!!!11" and run away. :dunno:
No actually we point out "socialism" and then point out his tweet like the OP and his articles in the WSJ. And you ignore all of that and continue with your stupid narrative oblivious of facts.

As I say, obsessed with a Magical Word and a single tweet. Carry on.
As I say you igmore what doesnt fit your narrative. Go fuck yourself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top