Best argument against gun control. Nothing else needs to be said.

[Slade3200]

Do not worry though folks. The liars that lie about everything claim they do not want to ban all guns.

Like I said, the liars who lie about everything and defend their lying socialist scum sucking pig democrats claim they do not want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Uhh, sure some want to ban guns and some want to repeal the 2nd, also some want to keep the 2nd Amendment and institute smart regulations. Can you admit that those all exist on the Left?

What is your stance, and what would your stance accomplish?

I own guns and am supportive of law abiding citizens rights to own firearms. I’m fine with placing strong regulations on weapons or accessories that make guns more capable of mass casualties, like autos, bump stocks, and LCMs. I’m also fine with a registration, quick universal background check process, beefing up a restriction database and a waiting period to reduce impulse buys

And this accomplished what?

And what accomplished what? You asked what I support, I just told you.

 

[Jarlaxle]

You people need to calm the fuck down.

Nobody wants your damn guns.

Out and out lie.

 

[Pilot1]

No criminal activity will be stopped by further restricting the law abiding. Focus on stopping, and punishing the criminal.

 

[xband]

Do not worry though folks. The liars that lie about everything claim they do not want to ban all guns. Like I said, the liars who lie about everything and defend their lying socialist scum sucking pig democrats claim they do not want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Sadly, just as Mr. Ong's words fell on deaf ears as they rang their bell that "time was up," his words fall on gun grabber deaf ears here who will never hear the tragedy of their own beliefs until it is far far too late.

That looks like a tube audio amp and most likely the four tubes are pentodes. I don't see one tube diode so it must have a separate power supply. Four band pass filters are shown. Good pic and takes me back to the day.

 

[Rustic]

You people need to calm the fuck down.

Nobody wants your damn guns.

Gun control has never been about guns, it’s always been about control

 

[Marion Morrison]

No argument is needed. They will NEVER get a 2/3rds majority in congress and the states to repeal it. Never.
They may tinker around the edges but the 2nd is not in danger. Too much focus on the big picture while the left whittles away on the fringes.

FOCUS

I like to not say never.

 

[xband]

Break my door down and you will meet my Marlin 30-30 barrel end first. Never give the intruder a horizontal butt stroke.

 

[sparky]

Spoiler: bingo!!!

Gun control has never been about guns, it’s always been about control

Indeed so

What escapes most is, an armed society can become a police state

For ex, they can protect the 2nd, while trashing the other 26 amendments

JMHO

~S~

 

[Skull Pilot]

You people need to calm the fuck down.

Nobody wants your damn guns.

Really?

Democratic congressman: Force gun owners to get rid of assault weapons

 

[Skull Pilot]

Oh, I listen alright. Mass shootings are getting worse, not better. How do we fix that?

Guns are not the problem

Maybe we should make people get a permit to have kids.

 

[Pop23]

Do not worry though folks. The liars that lie about everything claim they do not want to ban all guns.

Like I said, the liars who lie about everything and defend their lying socialist scum sucking pig democrats claim they do not want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Uhh, sure some want to ban guns and some want to repeal the 2nd, also some want to keep the 2nd Amendment and institute smart regulations. Can you admit that those all exist on the Left?

What is your stance, and what would your stance accomplish?

I own guns and am supportive of law abiding citizens rights to own firearms. I’m fine with placing strong regulations on weapons or accessories that make guns more capable of mass casualties, like autos, bump stocks, and LCMs. I’m also fine with a registration, quick universal background check process, beefing up a restriction database and a waiting period to reduce impulse buys

And this accomplished what?

And what accomplished what? You asked what I support, I just told you.

A bit of a typo. What would passing those accomplish?

 

[JoeB131]

Like I said, the liars who lie about everything and defend their lying socialist scum sucking pig democrats claim they do not want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

actually, the second should be repealed because it's lost any of it's original meaning. It's original meaning was about Militias, but today we don't have militias, we have a professional standing army and professional police forces.

It was never about 'gun ownership", which was plain old rare in colonial times.

The thing was, the whole concept of "I gets to own me a semi-automatic rifle because Second Amendment" would have been considered silly 50 years ago. this was back when the NRA and Republicans saw the need for common sense gun control.

Silly Darkies, Rights are for White People


Now a funny thing happened. Hunting went from being a mainstream sport to kind of the sport of inbred rednecks, and the gun manufacturers needed a way to increase revenues. So they started marketing guns to guys like the mutants who get on here every day and talk about that personal stockpile they have to fights the government.

Much like the alcohol industry markets to the drunk the gun industry markets to the gun fetishist... which would be harmless, if we didn't have gun fetishists shooting up schools, theaters, their workplace, etc.

 

[Pilot1]

[
What escapes most is, an armed society can become a police state

For ex, they can protect the 2nd, while trashing the other 26 amendments

JMHO

~S~

No, just the opposite happens. A police state happens when the government disarms the law abiding populace. That's a police state! Police are government, and that is the only people they want armed. Oh, but the criminals will be armed also.

 

[JoeB131]

No, just the opposite happens. A police state happens when the government disarms the law abiding populace. That's a police state! Police are government, and that is the only people they want armed. Oh, but the criminals will be armed also.

Um.. okay.

Most industrialized democracies either ban guns or limit who can own them, and they have less of a police presence than we do. They also have less crime and less violence, and lock up a small fraction of the number of people we do.

 

[sparky]

We've assumed how many lettered departments since 9/11 fellas?

Let me remind you they all will utilize N.I.M.S. to essentially deputize the populace ,given any issue they wish to portray as a threat to national security

What that means is pitting us against each other

To have us maintain our firearms AND control us is brilliant, if not historically significant

the scarecrows will be lined up waiting for their badges , with fema personell handing out ammo under the starts & bars

~S~

 

[2aguy]

Do not worry though folks. The liars that lie about everything claim they do not want to ban all guns.

Like I said, the liars who lie about everything and defend their lying socialist scum sucking pig democrats claim they do not want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Uhh, sure some want to ban guns and some want to repeal the 2nd, also some want to keep the 2nd Amendment and institute smart regulations. Can you admit that those all exist on the Left?

What is your stance, and what would your stance accomplish?

I own guns and am supportive of law abiding citizens rights to own firearms. I’m fine with placing strong regulations on weapons or accessories that make guns more capable of mass casualties, like autos, bump stocks, and LCMs. I’m also fine with a registration, quick universal background check process, beefing up a restriction database and a waiting period to reduce impulse buys

And this accomplished what?

None of the thing slade wants does anything to stop criminals or mass shooters...not a single thing. What it does do is make it incrementally more difficult, and incrementally more legally perilous for law abiding people to own and carry guns, as not doing the things he wants will incur stiff penalties on the law abiding, while criminals do whatever they want.

And nothing he suggested will work, or is needed...we have all the laws we need right now, the problem is that the democrat party keeps letting violent gun criminals out of jail........fix that, and our already declining gun violence will go even lower...

We went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 17 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2017...guess what happened...



--------
-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

 

[2aguy]

No, just the opposite happens. A police state happens when the government disarms the law abiding populace. That's a police state! Police are government, and that is the only people they want armed. Oh, but the criminals will be armed also.

Um.. okay.

Most industrialized democracies either ban guns or limit who can own them, and they have less of a police presence than we do. They also have less crime and less violence, and lock up a small fraction of the number of people we do.

Wrong.....they all now have increasing violent crime including gun crime, their welfare states have destroyed their families and they are importing violent immigrants who now control the drug trade in those countries....

You mopes think that crime rates are trapped in amber, and will never change......and you are wrong.

 

[2aguy]

Do not worry though folks. The liars that lie about everything claim they do not want to ban all guns.

Like I said, the liars who lie about everything and defend their lying socialist scum sucking pig democrats claim they do not want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Uhh, sure some want to ban guns and some want to repeal the 2nd, also some want to keep the 2nd Amendment and institute smart regulations. Can you admit that those all exist on the Left?

What is your stance, and what would your stance accomplish?

I own guns and am supportive of law abiding citizens rights to own firearms. I’m fine with placing strong regulations on weapons or accessories that make guns more capable of mass casualties, like autos, bump stocks, and LCMs. I’m also fine with a registration, quick universal background check process, beefing up a restriction database and a waiting period to reduce impulse buys

None of the things you want will stop criminals or mass shooters.....

Do you understand that there is no research that supports anything you suggested? That what you want you simply want out of emotion, and not from any actual detterrent effect?

 

[RealDave]

Do not worry though folks. The liars that lie about everything claim they do not want to ban all guns.

Like I said, the liars who lie about everything and defend their lying socialist scum sucking pig democrats claim they do not want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Wow, nothing like a Trumpette complaining about liars.

Ban the assault type rifles.

More requirements to conceal carry.

Now explain how that is banning all guns.

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong.....they all now have increasing violent crime including gun crime, their welfare states have destroyed their families and they are importing violent immigrants who now control the drug trade in those countries....

Yeah, guy... those countries have nowhere near the crime rates we have... i know i hate keep having to break that to you.