2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,174
- 52,419
- 2,290
If you don't think schools answer to their communities, their parents and their school board, you are sadly mistaken. It sounds as if "school choice" means the government will be flooding money into private schools that are apparently not beholden to tax payers or parents, except by the traffic through their doors. Maybe that will work as you describe. I don't know. But it raises a lot of questions, starting with where is all this money coming from? Is it just being taken from the public schools that are already gasping for funding in poorer neighborhoods with low tax bases?I had a nasty, nasty bulldyke of a gym teacher for three years who made life misery for me and a number of other girls who weren't her favorites. She was a miserable bitch but I didn't turn against the teaching profession because of it. You ever meet someone nasty and unfair at work? In your local PTA or church group? Some people are like that; they can pop up in a school, as well.Most people who suck at their jobs can be fired. Teachers, thanks to unions, really can't. So tax payer's are forced to continue to pay in, yet not get much return on the 'investment.' Not saying all teachers are bad, but a decent number of them are. As a parent you don't get to shop for teachers, or schools; you're stuck with whatever happens to come up. Even if you /really/ dislike a teacher, you've got almost no redress if there doesn't happen to be room in another class.
I had to spend half a year being taught by a teacher that publicly accused me of telling a friend to commit suicide. I had given him a mix tape that included the song Suicide Solution by Ozzy. The teacher took it as an encouragement (the song is actually the opposite.) The teachers comment was not only in the news paper but on TV. The fucked up part, that teacher became the principle of the school three years later. Thank's teachers union \o/
The sad thing is, a lot of teachers agree that the tenure laws allow burnt out teachers to stay too long. The reason for the law, though, isn't to protect lousy teachers. It goes straight back to the salary issue. School boards looking at a tight budget and a loudly protesting group of tax payers would fire any teacher about to go up in the pay scale. Whether someone is a good teacher or not can be very subjective and if you look closely enough with a dark enough pair of glasses, you will find reasons whether they exist or not. Some schools here are famous for hiring new teachers for two years and then when they would receive tenure and get a pay raise, the school doesn't renew and hires some other brand new "cheap" teachers.
I agree with you that firing an incompetent teacher should not be next to impossible. Just keep in mind that "incompetent" can be largely in the mind of the beholder, or a personality issue, as it was with you.
And that is where vouchers come in....under the current system.....bad teachers get paid no matter how bad....and without a block, boards would fire good teachers because they earn a lot...that is the problem with a socialist monopoly on education.....
With vouchers.....schools have an incentive to pay good teachers and keep them...because they want to please the customers.....the parents who choose where to use the voucher...and they have an incentive to get rid of the bad teachers....again, the parents who choose the school........
That is the magic of competition and why vouchers are so important.....we use vouchers for everything we do...it is called money......and if a business wants our money, they have to make us happy....when did the government have to make you happy?
What is it about freedom you guys don't get.......
Right now...if your kid is having a problem with a teacher...you have to fight the administration and then the school board to get the problem fixed....and if they won't help you....you have to move to another school district or pay out of your own pocket to send them to a good school...after your property taxes go to support the hell hole school in your neighborhood....
And with vouchers...if the school sucks...you pull your kid...and your voucher, and send them to another school......and guess what......schools will have to actually satisfy the customer by educating children....if they don't they don't get paid....
Each kid already gets a certain amount of money for school...you simply give them that amount in a voucher, to be used anywhere they want....just like the G.I. Bill.....and all the lefties love that program.....
Those poor public schools...are not going to improve no matter how much money you give them...because they don't have to...we have high schools in Chicago...built to hold 3,000 students...who only have 300 kids in them, with most of the building sealed off...because those black Chicagoans who could leave....left......
Vouchers will bring back those bad schools, they will allow better people to run them.....
Why is it you can sit in your home, with every modern convenience, created by competition, and freedom of choice, making them better and less expensive and more accessible to every economic level....yet you don't think the same thing will work when schools have to make their customers happy.......?