Yeah but... National Enquirer... (snicker)Apparently you are given we just went through a trial where it was exposed Trump was doing with the National Enquirer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah but... National Enquirer... (snicker)Apparently you are given we just went through a trial where it was exposed Trump was doing with the National Enquirer.
That’s not at all the same thing. Capitulation implies they were resistant to the idea.Yes which is the same thing, they did not resist
Feel free to Show itYes there is.
Funny that you call yourself a thinker. Let me ask. Has your analysis concluded that all the information on Hunter laptop was authentic? Has it concluded that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump?I decide for me what information to accept or reject. That’s how it works in Thinkers Land
Lib loons may need censorship handling but I don’t need agenda driven entities sifting things for me. Nor does any thinker
Paid Slade in the houseFunny that you call yourself a thinker. Let me ask. Has your analysis concluded that all the information on Hunter laptop was authentic? Has it concluded that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump?
Friday is golf day… get your facts straight. But by all means, avoid the questions I asked. Heaven forbid you actually engage!!!Paid Slade in the house
Look for about 12 posts rapidly and then disappear until Fridays payday of 12 max limit
Just stunning how many insider things I have been apprised of
I already showed. If you can’t or won’t read it, not my problem.Feel free to Show it
Of course they did t resist. They were gladly used as an agent of government.Yes which is the same thing, they did not resist
The Supreme Court on Wednesday shot down a lawsuit against the Biden administration over its efforts to urge social media companies to take down alleged misinformation about Covid-19, election fraud and other topics.
Two red states and five social media users do not have legal standing to sue various federal officials over their communications with the tech platforms, the court held in a 6-3 ruling.
The court’s majority — which consisted of three conservative justices and three liberals — said that the role of the social media companies in establishing and enforcing their content-moderation policies meant the plaintiffs weren’t directly censored by the government. The majority also noted that the social media platforms were not named as defendants in the case.
I read what you posted, but you did not show Evidence to back up your pointI already showed. If you can’t or won’t read it, not my problem.