Biden's Fatal Mistake?

Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Name one
Elizabeth Warren.
Nope, she took a blood test to prove she was an indian and the test proved she was not, then she went on TV saying that she was. Proving that she is schizophrenic as a schizzo she can be anything they chooses.
Let me guess, you are a trump supporter, right?
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Name one
Elizabeth Warren.
Nope, she took a blood test to prove she was an indian and the test proved she was not, then she went on TV saying that she was. Proving that she is schizophrenic as a schizzo she can be anything they chooses.
Let me guess, you are a trump supporter, right?
Let me guess you volunteered to change Bidens diapers
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Name one
Elizabeth Warren.
Nope, she took a blood test to prove she was an indian and the test proved she was not, then she went on TV saying that she was. Proving that she is schizophrenic as a schizzo she can be anything they chooses.
Let me guess, you are a trump supporter, right?
Let me guess you volunteered to change Bidens diapers
Why won't you answer my question?
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Name one
Elizabeth Warren.
Nope, she took a blood test to prove she was an indian and the test proved she was not, then she went on TV saying that she was. Proving that she is schizophrenic as a schizzo she can be anything they chooses.
Let me guess, you are a trump supporter, right?
Let me guess you volunteered to change Bidens diapers
Why won't you answer my question?
Well actually I am not required to answer questions..............................
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?
Then why didn't you nominate one?
Why didn't I nominate one what, for what?
Why didn't you pick a woman to be the nominee, dumbass.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?
Then why didn't you nominate one?
Why didn't I nominate one what, for what?
Why didn't you pick a woman to be the nominee, dumbass.
Because I didn't vote yet in the primary, asshole.
 
Bidens other, apparently nonfatal, mistakes

Sexually assaulting Tara Reade
Abusing his office by making Burisma hire Hunter
oh? I thought he had them hire Hunter as a clever means to launder money that was actually for himself, not Hunter?
After all, who were they really paying, Joe or Hunter. Joe was the very influential VP of the United States while Hunter was nothing.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Name one
Elizabeth Warren.
Nope, she took a blood test to prove she was an indian and the test proved she was not, then she went on TV saying that she was. Proving that she is schizophrenic as a schizzo she can be anything they chooses.
Let me guess, you are a trump supporter, right?
Let me guess you volunteered to change Bidens diapers
Why won't you answer my question?
Well actually I am not required to answer questions..............................
Or you are just too ashamed to say yes.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
Do your own research.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Name one
Elizabeth Warren.
Nope, she took a blood test to prove she was an indian and the test proved she was not, then she went on TV saying that she was. Proving that she is schizophrenic as a schizzo she can be anything they chooses.
Let me guess, you are a trump supporter, right?
Let me guess you volunteered to change Bidens diapers
Why won't you answer my question?
Well actually I am not required to answer questions..............................
Or you are just too ashamed to say yes.
And you won't admit that you have changed Biden's diapers.

Did you save them as souvenirs?
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
Do your own research.

Already tried.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
Do your own research.
LOL he can't find a link to your imagination.

Unless he finds an oompa loompa
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
Do your own research.
LOL he can't find a link to your imagination.

Unless he finds an oompa loompa
You're an idiot. Put the bottle down and pass out for the night.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
Do your own research.

Already tried.
It's not my problem you're incapable doing a Google search.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
Do your own research.

Already tried.
It's not my problem you're incapable doing a Google search.

Never had a problem in the past.
Why dont you show me how it's done?
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Name one
Elizabeth Warren.
Nope, she took a blood test to prove she was an indian and the test proved she was not, then she went on TV saying that she was. Proving that she is schizophrenic as a schizzo she can be anything they chooses.
Let me guess, you are a trump supporter, right?
Let me guess you volunteered to change Bidens diapers
Why won't you answer my question?
Well actually I am not required to answer questions..............................
Or you are just too ashamed to say yes.
Not at all, I just like entertaining assholes
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.

The person needs to be the most qualified.
And you failed to answer a very valid point. If we are going by numbers there should only be a few black politicians...right?
No, they don't need to be the most qualified. trump is living proof of that.

The ratio of Black Americans to Black politicians is pretty much the same exact percentage from what I have read.

link?
Do your own research.
LOL he can't find a link to your imagination.

Unless he finds an oompa loompa
You're an idiot. Put the bottle down and pass out for the night.
Nah, you have any idea how Apple stock will fare if there is another downturn?
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

It is if there are better suited males available for the job.
And if numbers matter there should only be a couple of black politicians....right?
Oh,the difference is only around 6 million.
There are plenty of women just as qualified as any man out there to be vice president.
Then why didn't you nominate one of them?
 

Forum List

Back
Top