jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 138,919
- 28,999
- 2,180
Nice back pedaling. You need a new writerI just said that he was not. You are also a TROLL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice back pedaling. You need a new writerI just said that he was not. You are also a TROLL.
CultistTROLL
TROLLNice back pedaling. You need a new writer
TROLLCultist
CultistTROLL
more agendas cloaked in the guise of 'facts'You don't get facts from wealthy people.
anthropogenic supporters cite CO production juxtaposed to CC , yet little 'data' is available pursuant to the loss of the biggest CO sponge on this rock...........If you want to refute the science, you're going to have to talk the science. Sorry if that's tough for you but, to be honest, it's quite easy on my side of this argument. When I say that AGW is supported by mountains of evidence, I'm not lying.
The Amazon might disappear by the end of the next century (ie, in 78 years) but it hasn't disappeared yet and it had hardly been touched at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution when CO2 started climbing. Simple bookkeeping can make (has made) a good estimate of how much fossil fuel has been burned since the Industrial Revolution began and its contribution to the atmosphere can be calculated. Those calculations show that virtually every molecule of CO2 above 280 ppm is of human origin. An isotopic analysis of the CO2 in the atmosphere which readily identifies CO2 produced from the combustion of fossil fuels produces figures in very close agreement. Deforestation in the Amazon and elsewhere will increase CO2 levels in the atmosphere and will slow their decline after our emissions have stopped, but the primary culprit at this point IS the combustion of fossil fuel for energy and transportation.anthropogenic supporters cite CO production juxtaposed to CC , yet little 'data' is available pursuant to the loss of the biggest CO sponge on this rock...........
The Amazon Rain Forest Is Nearly Gone. We Went to the Front Lines to See If It Could Be Saved
If nothing is done, the Amazon might completely disappear before the end of the centurytime.com
The forces set in play in the Amazon could have serious global consequences. The forest stores up to 120 billion metric tons of carbon, equivalent to almost 12 years of global emissions at current rates. If cleared, much of that will go into the atmosphere. That alone could push the global climate beyond safe limits.
IF the scientific community could nail a linear relationship here, it would grant a pass to the hydrocarbon kings, and subsequently kill any green machine pursuits, legislations, and/or subsidies
which is is exactly why AGW 'science' is in reality, politicized science
~S~
So the conundrum is remove CO2 kill trees and the dead trees give us more CO2. And demofks say science! Hahahaanthropogenic supporters cite CO production juxtaposed to CC , yet little 'data' is available pursuant to the loss of the biggest CO sponge on this rock...........
The Amazon Rain Forest Is Nearly Gone. We Went to the Front Lines to See If It Could Be Saved
If nothing is done, the Amazon might completely disappear before the end of the centurytime.com
The forces set in play in the Amazon could have serious global consequences. The forest stores up to 120 billion metric tons of carbon, equivalent to almost 12 years of global emissions at current rates. If cleared, much of that will go into the atmosphere. That alone could push the global climate beyond safe limits.
IF the scientific community could nail a linear relationship here, it would grant a pass to the hydrocarbon kings, and subsequently kill any green machine pursuits, legislations, and/or subsidies
which is is exactly why AGW 'science' is in reality, politicized science
~S~
global warming can be debated but one thing that cannot be debated is that Uber wealthy oil execs cannot be trusted to debate anything that requires facts. You don't get facts from wealthy people.
I was watching ancient aliens on the history channel and the episode claimed the pyramids may have been power plants for electricity! First time I’ve heard that. Very interesting!We need cheap, reliable energy.
At this point, that means lots of fossil fuels.
You can't debate that.
Cheaper than it has been? Why?We need cheap, reliable energy.
At this point, that means lots of fossil fuels.
You can't debate that.
Cheaper than it has been? Why?
More reliable than it has been? Why?
Is there some crisis underway of which I'm just not aware?
There is the global warming crisis but you seem to have given that some really short shrift.
Like you and AGW?Cheaper than it has been? Why?
Cheaper than wind and solar.
More reliable than it has been? Why?
More reliable than wind and solar.
Is there some crisis underway of which I'm just not aware?
There are plenty of things of which you're just not aware.
Warming you can’t seem to justifyCheaper than it has been? Why?
More reliable than it has been? Why?
Is there some crisis underway of which I'm just not aware?
There is the global warming crisis but you seem to have given that some really short shrift.
TROLLWarming you can’t seem to justify
Cultist. This is funTROLL
TROLLCultist. This is fun