jeffrockit
Senior Member
- Nov 16, 2008
- 1,341
- 165
- 48
The people are not happy in Arizona.
70% support the bill. I guess 30% are not happy. What constitutes a majority?
Baylor University || The Lariat Online || News
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The people are not happy in Arizona.
The people are not happy in Arizona.
70% support the bill. I guess 30% are not happy. What constitutes a majority?
Baylor University || The Lariat Online || News
The people are not happy in Arizona.
70% support the bill. I guess 30% are not happy. What constitutes a majority?
Baylor University || The Lariat Online || News
"If you [are stopped by police] one too many times it's very burdensome. It's the sort of thing like if you are followed in a store because of the way you look," Hernandez said.
Okay, so two people walk into your store. One is a white guy in nice shorts and a polo shirt, with a nice haircut. The other is black wearing a jacket with lots of pockets...which one are YOU going to keep your eye on, and why is that or isn't it racist?
Yeah, getting stopped by the police is burdensome. It was a burden for me to have to go to court with my proof of insurance when I was caught with out it, but I did it. Big deal. There are laws, I object to cops just walking up to a person on the street and demanding ID, but I have no problems with them arresting someone when they were speeding and didn't have prof they were here legally.
YouTube - 4409 -- Arrested over Arizona's Real I.D. Paper's Please SB1070 bill
This guy showed his drivers license
YouTube - 4409 -- Arrested over Arizona's Real I.D. Paper's Please SB1070 bill
This guy showed his drivers license
That shows you e-verify doesn't work.
this law opens up for racist, civil rights violtions etc... this law is as fucked up as it can be but only in the south would this happen. and other state have all the right to say something like this.
cause it will effect there state. there so much wrong with this. how do you find someone illegal immgration? color of skin=yes = stop= racist. = voiton of civil rights
The law specifically says that people can't be stopped simply to check their status.
If that was the case, why would immigrants need to have their papers on them at all times to produce on demand?
You must have your drivers license on your person if you wish to drive a car. It's not enforced worth a damn, but it is a crime. I believe you are also required to produce ID if requested by an officer of the law... so I guess yes, you must carry ID.I am 53, white and have to carry my ID. Why is this so difficult to understand. My grandchildren are half hispanic, one father was born here, one came here legally. They have no problem with this bill.
You HAVE to carry your ID? Really?
No, there is no requirement to carry ID, only licenses for particular privileges, such as driving a vehicle. I can't believe other moderates and conservatives aren't screaming about this, BUT this will undermine any legitiamte argument from the far right that a national ID is somehow wrong. The right has forever given its approval to a national ID.
your right Jake....this question was asked to a Criminal defence attorney in an on-line legal advice forum....he answered thus....
A person CANNOT be arrested just for failing to identify himself or failing to have ID, even with a lawful detention. It is NOT interfering with an officer. The only effect of not having ID occurs if a police officer has probable cause to believe an arrestee has committed a criminal offense. A police officer who could otherwise give an arrestee a citation to appear would instead take the person into custody to appear before a magistrate. But this is ONLY if the officer has probable cause to believe the person has committed a crime--NOT just because the person did not have ID.
Of course, one must have identification in his or her possession when driving, and a police officer obviously can demand to see a drivers license from any driver lawfully detained.
My brother in law is from Canada and he's been told to carry his green card <which is actually pink, btw> at all times. Why is it only the whites have to obey the laws?
your right Jake....this question was asked to a Criminal defence attorney in an on-line legal advice forum....he answered thus....
A person CANNOT be arrested just for failing to identify himself or failing to have ID, even with a lawful detention. It is NOT interfering with an officer. The only effect of not having ID occurs if a police officer has probable cause to believe an arrestee has committed a criminal offense. A police officer who could otherwise give an arrestee a citation to appear would instead take the person into custody to appear before a magistrate. But this is ONLY if the officer has probable cause to believe the person has committed a crime--NOT just because the person did not have ID.
Of course, one must have identification in his or her possession when driving, and a police officer obviously can demand to see a drivers license from any driver lawfully detained.
My brother in law is from Canada and he's been told to carry his green card <which is actually pink, btw> at all times. Why is it only the whites have to obey the laws?
Who ever said that only white people have to obey the law? Where did you get THAT from?
My brother in law is from Canada and he's been told to carry his green card <which is actually pink, btw> at all times. Why is it only the whites have to obey the laws?
Who ever said that only white people have to obey the law? Where did you get THAT from?
Something that comes logically from all the complaints of Hispanics having to show their proof of residency.