BIG!!! Supreme Court agrees to hear birther case

[Gadawg73]

You all sure are afraid of something. Most here don't seem to care if it's right or legal as long as their guy wins. They're afraid for the people to even see the information. Let the Supreme Court do it's job, and hopefully do it right, and we can put all doubt behind us or prosecute a president for treason. Supreme Court, DO YOUR JOB.

What could I be afraid of?
Where is there any evidence? Where is it?
You are the one afraid of something.
No wonder we lose elections to the Democrats. Only a dumb ass believes this shit.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

It was hilarious. In fact most of the birther movement that showed up to see this were SHOCKED. They left knowing they had been conned. Lawsuits were filed the next day against Taitz and her organization demanding their donations back based on fraud.

I don't know if that's true or not in this case but it happens a lot. People hostile to a movement donate money to it and then demand their money back to give the movement bad press. Another trick of the trade.

 

[jillian]

birfer loons

 

[Gadawg73]

There is no evidence.
The entire birther movement is a fraud. They can not find one forensic documents examiner in the world to testify for them.
They have no case.

No case? HAHAHA. The law, such as Sheriff Joe says the BC is most likely a fake. And then there's the fact that obozo's own literary agency said he was born in kenya.

Are you really this stupid? Sherriff Joe?
Where did he get his training in forensic documents examining?

 

[Gadawg73]

It was hilarious. In fact most of the birther movement that showed up to see this were SHOCKED. They left knowing they had been conned. Lawsuits were filed the next day against Taitz and her organization demanding their donations back based on fraud.

I don't know if that's true or not in this case but it happens a lot. People hostile to a movement donate money to it and then demand their money back to give the movement bad press. Another trick of the trade.

Yes, you really are this stupid.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

What could I be afraid of?
Where is there any evidence? Where is it?
You are the one afraid of something.
No wonder we lose elections to the Democrats. Only a dumb ass believes this shit.

Obozo's own literary agency said he was born in kenya and that means he told them that. That's what scares you. HAHAHA

It's curtains for obozo.

 

[Gadawg73]

Even if President Barrack Obama was not born in the United States of America, there is no reason that we should not accept his presidency. Those who argue the constitution do not understand the actual implications of the constitution and what it represents. The citizenship clause of the constitution is a racially motivated amendment which was created only to prohibit the people that were stolen from Afrika from being able to rule the land that we stole from the Native Amerikans. So you see, this is irrelevant to the context of the big picture.

The big picture is this:

When you think critically about a document that was written hundreds of years ago by racist, sexist, classist individuals, what part of that reflects the current democracy that we live in?

13% of our country consists of people who were not born here, and because of that we deny them the ability to be President completely because of that.

35% of this country are non-whites, and 12.3% of those are Afrikan, whom were the target of this racist law when it was formed, to prevent the Afrikans from ever being a part of this society. Barrack Obama is an Afrikan...and he is president. It has happened and nothing can take it back, the correct path has been chosen.


And now we must question what this 'natural born' clause really means. If it is not under the guise of racism, then what benefit can we possibly have, suppressing 32% of the country by telling them that they may have lived in our country from 3 months of age, but they will never be Amerikan enough to be President because as a society we wanted to prevent the Afrikan from being president....which these white supremists did not succeed at, by the way.

I'll just go ahead and assume that you would have sympathized with the british crown.

Interestingly enough, the reason that the founding fathers (Who were racist, elitist, sexist individuals) broke away from Great Britain was not because of the crown itself, but rather, the East India Company that had made a complete monopoly of the tea market. The reason that the taxes on tea and other products were raised by the King of England was because East-India Company influenced the King to do so, and politically the crown had no choice because the East-India Company had lent the crown money...the crown was broke prior to this and this is what led to Government of India Act 1858 as well.

So, in fact, I did not sympathize with the crown because the crown was not the perpetrator of the reason of the revolt, it was in fact, a corporation, and this corporation had created as system of inverted totalitarianism that this country was founded because of and ironically has replicated.

Tea was just one of many things the EIC sold to England. Massive amounts of porcelain and many other commodities of that era that most Americans could never afford.
Their tea trade to the colonies dwarfed most everything else they did all over the world.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

Are you really this stupid? Sherriff Joe?
Where did he get his training in forensic documents examining?

He's sheriff and he hired people with the training. HAHAHA. Obozo is finished.

 

[jillian]

Taitz is a lying nutcase...

from the SCOTUSblog

The Court also denied review of a petition filed by "birther" Orly Taitz, who sought to overturn the $20,000 penalty imposed on her by a federal judge for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

ww.scotusblog.com/2011/01/tuesday-round-up-54/

there is nothing else in SCOTUSblog that has anything to do with the birfer. i can't wait for her to pay the $20,000 in costs the wackadoodle owes

 

[jillian]

[

What could I be afraid of?
Where is there any evidence? Where is it?
You are the one afraid of something.
No wonder we lose elections to the Democrats. Only a dumb ass believes this shit.

Obozo's own literary agency said he was born in kenya and that means he told them that. That's what scares you. HAHAHA

It's curtains for obozo.

no. he said he was kenyan. not "born in kenya". in the same way that i say i'm russian, in the sense that my grandparents were from russia. and my friends of italian heritage say they're italian.

but keep spewing birfer lunacy.

you just keep making dems look better and better.

 

[Gadawg73]

[

What could I be afraid of?
Where is there any evidence? Where is it?
You are the one afraid of something.
No wonder we lose elections to the Democrats. Only a dumb ass believes this shit.

Obozo's own literary agency said he was born in kenya and that means he told them that. That's what scares you. HAHAHA

It's curtains for obozo.

Bet you 10 grand the birthers will have NO evidence once again.
Your team showed up here and was UNOPPOSED at the hearing and LOST.
That is like showing up at a ball game and the other team forgot to come and you still lose!
I voted Romney and McCain.
Your case is a fraud. Give it up, it makes you look like a dumb ass.

 

[Gadawg73]

[

Are you really this stupid? Sherriff Joe?
Where did he get his training in forensic documents examining?

He's sheriff and he hired people with the training. HAHAHA. Obozo is finished.

LOL, you are kidding, right!
Had me going. I was taking you seriously.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?

Breaking news! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules a case by Attorney Taitz regarding Obama’s forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Posted on | January 9, 2013 |

Law offices of Orly Taitz
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

I am a staunch conservative....I am SICK of this nonsense.
Whomever is pursuing this should just let it go...

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?

Breaking news! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules a case by Attorney Taitz regarding Obama’s forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Posted on | January 9, 2013 |

Law offices of Orly Taitz
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

Young, dumb, and full of....

Well, you know.

This is a false story.

You're an idiot.

 

[thereisnospoon]

i hope they slap her so hard they reverse the retard in her.

I must agree. This birther thing is tiresome.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Orly Taitz is Ayn Rand reborn

The roughly 10,000 petitions that the court receives annually are referred to the regular conference meetings for discussion, then around 100 are picked by the justices for oral arguments and a final decision. The votes of four justices in the conference are needed to schedule arguments. The scheduling comes a week after another birther activist suggested impeaching Roberts if he attempted to swear-in Obama later this month.

 

[jillian]

Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?

Breaking news! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules a case by Attorney Taitz regarding Obama’s forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Posted on | January 9, 2013 |

Law offices of Orly Taitz
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

I am a staunch conservative....I am SICK of this nonsense.
Whomever is pursuing this should just let it go...

orly taitz, the chiropractor, lawyer, yoga instructor, who is so concerned with the place of the president's birth, wasn't even born here.

the irony is kind of sweet.

and i hate myself right now. but pos rep for you.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Even if President Barrack Obama was not born in the United States of America, there is no reason that we should not accept his presidency. Those who argue the constitution do not understand the actual implications of the constitution and what it represents. The citizenship clause of the constitution is a racially motivated amendment which was created only to prohibit the people that were stolen from Afrika from being able to rule the land that we stole from the Native Amerikans. So you see, this is irrelevant to the context of the big picture.

The big picture is this:

When you think critically about a document that was written hundreds of years ago by racist, sexist, classist individuals, what part of that reflects the current democracy that we live in?

13% of our country consists of people who were not born here, and because of that we deny them the ability to be President completely because of that.

35% of this country are non-whites, and 12.3% of those are Afrikan, whom were the target of this racist law when it was formed, to prevent the Afrikans from ever being a part of this society. Barrack Obama is an Afrikan...and he is president. It has happened and nothing can take it back, the correct path has been chosen.


And now we must question what this 'natural born' clause really means. If it is not under the guise of racism, then what benefit can we possibly have, suppressing 32% of the country by telling them that they may have lived in our country from 3 months of age, but they will never be Amerikan enough to be President because as a society we wanted to prevent the Afrikan from being president....which these white supremists did not succeed at, by the way.

Oh thank you Lord of the overanalyzation.
I believe you are convinced there is more to a pot of water than meets the eye.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Taitz is a lying nutcase...

from the SCOTUSblog

The Court also denied review of a petition filed by "birther" Orly Taitz, who sought to overturn the $20,000 penalty imposed on her by a federal judge for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

In the first place, the birther argument is NOT frivolous. There's a ton of evidence to support it. In the second place, the $20,000 penalty is insanely high and more evidence the govt is trying to shut up super-orly.

 

[cutter]

You all sure are afraid of something. Most here don't seem to care if it's right or legal as long as their guy wins. They're afraid for the people to even see the information. Let the Supreme Court do it's job, and hopefully do it right, and we can put all doubt behind us or prosecute a president for treason. Supreme Court, DO YOUR JOB.

What could I be afraid of?
Where is there any evidence? Where is it?
You are the one afraid of something.
No wonder we lose elections to the Democrats. Only a dumb ass believes this shit.

So what is so bad about the Supreme Court looking at it? Your right about me being afraid. I'm afraid we have an illegal President and it will take a revolution to set things right. No we can't just ignore it if the facts come out that he's a fraud. I am afraid but determined to see justice done.