BIG!!! Supreme Court agrees to hear birther case

[del]

Orly Taitz is Ayn Rand reborn

The roughly 10,000 petitions that the court receives annually are referred to the regular conference meetings for discussion, then around 100 are picked by the justices for oral arguments and a final decision. The votes of four justices in the conference are needed to schedule arguments. The scheduling comes a week after another birther activist suggested impeaching Roberts if he attempted to swear-in Obama later this month.

orly taitz is shemp howard reborn

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Taitz is a lying nutcase...

from the SCOTUSblog

The Court also denied review of a petition filed by "birther" Orly Taitz, who sought to overturn the $20,000 penalty imposed on her by a federal judge for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

In the first place, the birther argument is NOT frivolous. There's a ton of evidence to support it. In the second place, the $20,000 penalty is insanely high and more evidence the govt is trying to shut up super-orly.

bye bye

The roughly 10,000 petitions that the court receives annually are referred to the regular conference meetings for discussion, then around 100 are picked by the justices for oral arguments and a final decision. The votes of four justices in the conference are needed to schedule arguments. The scheduling comes a week after another birther activist suggested impeaching Roberts if he attempted to swear-in Obama later this month.

Shoot self in foot, add water and stir

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
I am a staunch conservative....I am SICK of this nonsense.
Whomever is pursuing this should just let it go...

HAHAHA. You're not fooling anyone with that silly trick. You're a super-blue loony lib.

 

[jillian]

[
I am a staunch conservative....I am SICK of this nonsense.
Whomever is pursuing this should just let it go...

HAHAHA. You're not fooling anyone with that silly trick. You're a super-blue loony lib.

dude, the only thing he and i have ever agreed on is this.

he's one of the more far-right people on the board.

you'd know that if you had any reading comprehension skills.

you're a nutbar.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Even if President Barrack Obama was not born in the United States of America, there is no reason that we should not accept his presidency. Those who argue the constitution do not understand the actual implications of the constitution and what it represents. The citizenship clause of the constitution is a racially motivated amendment which was created only to prohibit the people that were stolen from Afrika from being able to rule the land that we stole from the Native Amerikans. So you see, this is irrelevant to the context of the big picture.

The big picture is this:

When you think critically about a document that was written hundreds of years ago by racist, sexist, classist individuals, what part of that reflects the current democracy that we live in?

13% of our country consists of people who were not born here, and because of that we deny them the ability to be President completely because of that.

35% of this country are non-whites, and 12.3% of those are Afrikan, whom were the target of this racist law when it was formed, to prevent the Afrikans from ever being a part of this society. Barrack Obama is an Afrikan...and he is president. It has happened and nothing can take it back, the correct path has been chosen.


And now we must question what this 'natural born' clause really means. If it is not under the guise of racism, then what benefit can we possibly have, suppressing 32% of the country by telling them that they may have lived in our country from 3 months of age, but they will never be Amerikan enough to be President because as a society we wanted to prevent the Afrikan from being president....which these white supremists did not succeed at, by the way.

Oh thank you Lord of the overanalyzation.
I believe you are convinced there is more to a pot of water than meets the eye.

He's got it all figured out for us.

 

[jillian]

You all sure are afraid of something. Most here don't seem to care if it's right or legal as long as their guy wins. They're afraid for the people to even see the information. Let the Supreme Court do it's job, and hopefully do it right, and we can put all doubt behind us or prosecute a president for treason. Supreme Court, DO YOUR JOB.

What could I be afraid of?
Where is there any evidence? Where is it?
You are the one afraid of something.
No wonder we lose elections to the Democrats. Only a dumb ass believes this shit.

So what is so bad about the Supreme Court looking at it? Your right about me being afraid. I'm afraid we have an illegal President and it will take a revolution to set things right. No we can't just ignore it if the facts come out that he's a fraud. I am afraid but determined to see justice done.

there's nothing to look at. that's why.

birfers are really, really stupid.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Why is the SC hearing this now. Is israel pressuring them over Obozo's nomination of anti-israel Hagel for Sec of Defense? I want obozo gone but one thing i do like about him is he seems to be anti-israel. Romney was an israel-firster.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
there's nothing to look at. that's why.

birfers are really, really stupid.

I love how you anti-birthers "argue". It's always name-calling. HAHA

 

[jesus_nihilist]

I'll just go ahead and assume that you would have sympathized with the british crown.

Interestingly enough, the reason that the founding fathers (Who were racist, elitist, sexist individuals) broke away from Great Britain was not because of the crown itself, but rather, the East India Company that had made a complete monopoly of the tea market. The reason that the taxes on tea and other products were raised by the King of England was because East-India Company influenced the King to do so, and politically the crown had no choice because the East-India Company had lent the crown money...the crown was broke prior to this and this is what led to Government of India Act 1858 as well.

So, in fact, I did not sympathize with the crown because the crown was not the perpetrator of the reason of the revolt, it was in fact, a corporation, and this corporation had created as system of inverted totalitarianism that this country was founded because of and ironically has replicated.

Tea was just one of many things the EIC sold to England. Massive amounts of porcelain and many other commodities of that era that most Americans could never afford.
Their tea trade to the colonies dwarfed most everything else they did all over the world.

and?

 

[thereisnospoon]

[
I am a staunch conservative....I am SICK of this nonsense.
Whomever is pursuing this should just let it go...

HAHAHA. You're not fooling anyone with that silly trick. You're a super-blue loony lib.

You're that wimpy fuck that wants everybody to drive 45 mph on the interstate. I bet you think kids should use chest protectors and masks to play in the outfield.
I bet you think there should be harsh penalties for people who don't wear helmets while riding a bicycle.
I bet you think there should be handrails on hiking trails.
This birther thing is HORSESHIT.. Even if Obama was born in Kenya, what the fuck can we do about it now? Nothing.
Oh, do you really want Joe Fucking Bite me Biden in the Oval Office?

 

[thereisnospoon]

It was hilarious. In fact most of the birther movement that showed up to see this were SHOCKED. They left knowing they had been conned. Lawsuits were filed the next day against Taitz and her organization demanding their donations back based on fraud.

I don't know if that's true or not in this case but it happens a lot. People hostile to a movement donate money to it and then demand their money back to give the movement bad press. Another trick of the trade.

People like you are fracturing the republican party. You small minded single issue assholes.
You are no conservative.
You are a selfish spoiled brat that is pissed off because you can't have your way.
It is my hope that the SCOTUS denounces this in such a manner, that it never come back up again.

 

[MeBelle]

While I'm not a huge fan of this issue, it is being reported in the HuffPo:

Orly Taitz Celebrates As Birther Case Is Referred To High Court

and shows up SCOTUS docket:

Search - Supreme Court of the United States

via HuffPo.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Taitz had appealed the fine to Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, respectively, in August and July. Each appeal has been denied.

The 11th Circuit had also backed U.S. District Judge Clay Land's decision to impose the fine "as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct and to protect the integrity of the court."

"The absolute absence of any legitimate legal argument, combined with the political diatribe in her motions, demonstrates that Ms. Taitz's purpose is to advance a political agenda and not to pursue a legitimate legal cause of action," Land wrote in his 43-page ruling.

Courthouse News Service

Even the Court’s two more extreme rightist ideologues won’t have anything to do with her.

Clearly this ‘birther’ idiocy has no place in our courts.

 

[SniperFire]

Excellent!

Take this fucker's regime down using the Court.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

This birther thing is HORSESHIT.. Even if Obama was born in Kenya, what the fuck can we do about it now? Nothing.
Oh, do you really want Joe Fucking Bite me Biden in the Oval Office?

Biden is better than obozo but more importantly, if it's proved the democrats lied about candidate obama, then the party is finished for 2016.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

You are a selfish spoiled brat that is pissed off because you can't have your way.
It is my hope that the SCOTUS denounces this in such a manner, that it never come back up again.

The only way to get rid of this issue is for obozo to step down. The evidence against him is just too overwhelming.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Taitz had appealed the fine to Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, respectively, in August and July. Each appeal has been denied.

The 11th Circuit had also backed U.S. District Judge Clay Land's decision to impose the fine "as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct and to protect the integrity of the court."

"The absolute absence of any legitimate legal argument, combined with the political diatribe in her motions, demonstrates that Ms. Taitz's purpose is to advance a political agenda and not to pursue a legitimate legal cause of action," Land wrote in his 43-page ruling.

Courthouse News Service

.

What's wrong with using the courts to advance a political agenda.?? People do that all the time.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Let's assume it's true. President Biden will give complete immunity to former President Obama and nominate Michelle Obama to be the Vice President of the United States. Mrs. Obama only needs a simply majority in both houses of Congress to assume the office, and if confirmed will be the leading candidate should President Biden not decide to run in 2016. Or, President Biden will nominate Hilary Clinton for said office. In either case the D's will hold the White House until 2024

One more example of the radical rights inability to think beyond what they hope for.

 

[Flopper]

Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?

Breaking news! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules a case by Attorney Taitz regarding Obama’s forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Posted on | January 9, 2013 |

Law offices of Orly Taitz
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

Not quite. Taitz posted on her website Wednesday afternoon that the Supreme Court will discuss a case she filed on behalf of three minor presidential candidates -- including a federal prison inmate -- at their conference Feb. 15. The court's website confirms that Taitz's case, which she submitted to Chief Justice John Roberts' office last month, has been placed on the Feb. 15 conference agenda and has been distributed to the nine justices for consideration.

The roughly 10,000 petitions that the court receives annually are referred to the regular conference meetings for discussion, then around 100 are picked by the justices for oral arguments and a final decision. That puts the odds at about 1 in 100, that court will hear oral arguments on the case.
Orly Taitz Celebrates As Birther Case Is Referred To High Court

 

[SniperFire]

Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?

Breaking news! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules a case by Attorney Taitz regarding Obama’s forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Posted on | January 9, 2013 |

Law offices of Orly Taitz
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

So we suffered a coup d'etat by a foreign national and didn't even know it!