Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[Soupnazi630]

It is not an economic concept it is a claim you and others pulled out of thin air

the right wing simply makes up their rejection through simple bigotry.

No you simply make up false claims with no basis in fact and they are rejected with no need for evidence.


Your constant repetition of bigotry is proof you are wrong as you can only label and not present intelligent arguments

i already looked up the concept of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. It is an economic concept anyone who is discussing economics should understand.

It is not an economic concept it is an obscure idea you made up or heard and it is not shared but intelligent people especially not economists.

You have only appeal to authority where there is no authority or expertise.

you appeal to ignorance to refute my argument?

Nope I point out the fact that your argument is based on ignorance, which it is, and can there for be dismissed with no further argument

 

[Soupnazi630]

It does not and it is not

Providing for the general welfare must be a general power.

Individual welfare is not general welfare.

The general welfare must be comprehensive and cover individuals.

Nope cause that only increases dependency laziness and failure.

nope; it must solve for capitalism's natural laissez-fair laziness regarding full employment.

There is no such laziness or rate of unemployment.

Government is incapable of solving any such problems and that is proven fact.

Government only increases dependency and laziness

 

[Soupnazi630]

That's not what's going on.

Yes, it is. A first world economy Costs.

Employers pay what the job is worth. They are not welfare distribution centers.

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No they do not fix a standard of worth.

One of the biggest errors of marx was his value of labor theory which you are repeating .

Value is always subjective and cannot be set

yes; they do. why do you believe they don't?

Because they do not and cannot and because you are simply making up more crap which is patently false.

 

[danielpalos]

the right wing simply makes up their rejection through simple bigotry.

No you simply make up false claims with no basis in fact and they are rejected with no need for evidence.


Your constant repetition of bigotry is proof you are wrong as you can only label and not present intelligent arguments

i already looked up the concept of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. It is an economic concept anyone who is discussing economics should understand.

It is not an economic concept it is an obscure idea you made up or heard and it is not shared but intelligent people especially not economists.

You have only appeal to authority where there is no authority or expertise.

you appeal to ignorance to refute my argument?

Nope I point out the fact that your argument is based on ignorance, which it is, and can there for be dismissed with no further argument

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. there is no appeal to ignorance of that capital inefficiency.

 

[danielpalos]

Providing for the general welfare must be a general power.

Individual welfare is not general welfare.

The general welfare must be comprehensive and cover individuals.

Nope cause that only increases dependency laziness and failure.

nope; it must solve for capitalism's natural laissez-fair laziness regarding full employment.

There is no such laziness or rate of unemployment.

Government is incapable of solving any such problems and that is proven fact.

Government only increases dependency and laziness

yes, there is. and the Romans proved Government can solve all problems.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it is. A first world economy Costs.

Employers pay what the job is worth. They are not welfare distribution centers.

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No they do not fix a standard of worth.

One of the biggest errors of marx was his value of labor theory which you are repeating .

Value is always subjective and cannot be set

yes; they do. why do you believe they don't?

Because they do not and cannot and because you are simply making up more crap which is patently false.

a natural rate of unemployment is capital based concept. i don't have to resort to appeals to ignorance to claim a point i cannot defend.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No you simply make up false claims with no basis in fact and they are rejected with no need for evidence.


Your constant repetition of bigotry is proof you are wrong as you can only label and not present intelligent arguments

i already looked up the concept of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. It is an economic concept anyone who is discussing economics should understand.

It is not an economic concept it is an obscure idea you made up or heard and it is not shared but intelligent people especially not economists.

You have only appeal to authority where there is no authority or expertise.

you appeal to ignorance to refute my argument?

Nope I point out the fact that your argument is based on ignorance, which it is, and can there for be dismissed with no further argument

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. there is no appeal to ignorance of that capital inefficiency.

The claim that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment is a fictitious claim made in ignorance and there for can be dismissed with no evidence

 

[Soupnazi630]

Individual welfare is not general welfare.

The general welfare must be comprehensive and cover individuals.

Nope cause that only increases dependency laziness and failure.

nope; it must solve for capitalism's natural laissez-fair laziness regarding full employment.

There is no such laziness or rate of unemployment.

Government is incapable of solving any such problems and that is proven fact.

Government only increases dependency and laziness

yes, there is. and the Romans proved Government can solve all problems.

No there is no natural rate of unemployment and the Roman's solved no such problems

 

[Soupnazi630]

Employers pay what the job is worth. They are not welfare distribution centers.

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No they do not fix a standard of worth.

One of the biggest errors of marx was his value of labor theory which you are repeating .

Value is always subjective and cannot be set

yes; they do. why do you believe they don't?

Because they do not and cannot and because you are simply making up more crap which is patently false.

a natural rate of unemployment is capital based concept. i don't have to resort to appeals to ignorance to claim a point i cannot defend.

The natural rate of unemployment is dreamed up by the economically ignorant it is not a concept based on capital or any other school of thought

Claiming it exists by definition is an appeal to ignorance

 

[danielpalos]

i already looked up the concept of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. It is an economic concept anyone who is discussing economics should understand.

It is not an economic concept it is an obscure idea you made up or heard and it is not shared but intelligent people especially not economists.

You have only appeal to authority where there is no authority or expertise.

you appeal to ignorance to refute my argument?

Nope I point out the fact that your argument is based on ignorance, which it is, and can there for be dismissed with no further argument

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. there is no appeal to ignorance of that capital inefficiency.

The claim that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment is a fictitious claim made in ignorance and there for can be dismissed with no evidence

nothing but bigotry? why should i believe You instead of any book on economics.

 

[danielpalos]

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No they do not fix a standard of worth.

One of the biggest errors of marx was his value of labor theory which you are repeating .

Value is always subjective and cannot be set

yes; they do. why do you believe they don't?

Because they do not and cannot and because you are simply making up more crap which is patently false.

a natural rate of unemployment is capital based concept. i don't have to resort to appeals to ignorance to claim a point i cannot defend.

The natural rate of unemployment is dreamed up by the economically ignorant it is not a concept based on capital or any other school of thought

Claiming it exists by definition is an appeal to ignorance

it is a market based and market recognizable phenomena.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No they do not fix a standard of worth.

One of the biggest errors of marx was his value of labor theory which you are repeating .

Value is always subjective and cannot be set

yes; they do. why do you believe they don't?

Because they do not and cannot and because you are simply making up more crap which is patently false.

a natural rate of unemployment is capital based concept. i don't have to resort to appeals to ignorance to claim a point i cannot defend.

The natural rate of unemployment is dreamed up by the economically ignorant it is not a concept based on capital or any other school of thought

Claiming it exists by definition is an appeal to ignorance

it is a market based and market recognizable phenomena.

It is ignorance based and absolutely unprovable and undemonstrable.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is not an economic concept it is an obscure idea you made up or heard and it is not shared but intelligent people especially not economists.

You have only appeal to authority where there is no authority or expertise.

you appeal to ignorance to refute my argument?

Nope I point out the fact that your argument is based on ignorance, which it is, and can there for be dismissed with no further argument

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. there is no appeal to ignorance of that capital inefficiency.

The claim that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment is a fictitious claim made in ignorance and there for can be dismissed with no evidence

nothing but bigotry? why should i believe You instead of any book on economics.

There is no intelligent book written which supports your ideas

Accusing others of bigotry is a false hood proving you have no sound argument

 

[danielpalos]

yes; they do. why do you believe they don't?

Because they do not and cannot and because you are simply making up more crap which is patently false.

a natural rate of unemployment is capital based concept. i don't have to resort to appeals to ignorance to claim a point i cannot defend.

The natural rate of unemployment is dreamed up by the economically ignorant it is not a concept based on capital or any other school of thought

Claiming it exists by definition is an appeal to ignorance

it is a market based and market recognizable phenomena.

It is ignorance based and absolutely unprovable and undemonstrable.

only those who are ignorant of economics, claim that.

 

[danielpalos]

you appeal to ignorance to refute my argument?

Nope I point out the fact that your argument is based on ignorance, which it is, and can there for be dismissed with no further argument

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. there is no appeal to ignorance of that capital inefficiency.

The claim that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment is a fictitious claim made in ignorance and there for can be dismissed with no evidence

nothing but bigotry? why should i believe You instead of any book on economics.

There is no intelligent book written which supports your ideas

Accusing others of bigotry is a false hood proving you have no sound argument

bigotry is all you have; why should I believe You?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Because they do not and cannot and because you are simply making up more crap which is patently false.

a natural rate of unemployment is capital based concept. i don't have to resort to appeals to ignorance to claim a point i cannot defend.

The natural rate of unemployment is dreamed up by the economically ignorant it is not a concept based on capital or any other school of thought

Claiming it exists by definition is an appeal to ignorance

it is a market based and market recognizable phenomena.

It is ignorance based and absolutely unprovable and undemonstrable.

only those who are ignorant of economics, claim that.

You are quite wrong.
Only those ignorant of economics claims that there is a natural rate of unemployment

 

[danielpalos]

a natural rate of unemployment is capital based concept. i don't have to resort to appeals to ignorance to claim a point i cannot defend.

The natural rate of unemployment is dreamed up by the economically ignorant it is not a concept based on capital or any other school of thought

Claiming it exists by definition is an appeal to ignorance

it is a market based and market recognizable phenomena.

It is ignorance based and absolutely unprovable and undemonstrable.

only those who are ignorant of economics, claim that.

You are quite wrong.
Only those ignorant of economics claims that there is a natural rate of unemployment

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nope I point out the fact that your argument is based on ignorance, which it is, and can there for be dismissed with no further argument

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. there is no appeal to ignorance of that capital inefficiency.

The claim that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment is a fictitious claim made in ignorance and there for can be dismissed with no evidence

nothing but bigotry? why should i believe You instead of any book on economics.

There is no intelligent book written which supports your ideas

Accusing others of bigotry is a false hood proving you have no sound argument

bigotry is all you have; why should I believe You?

I have no bigotry at all and you are a liar.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The natural rate of unemployment is dreamed up by the economically ignorant it is not a concept based on capital or any other school of thought

Claiming it exists by definition is an appeal to ignorance

it is a market based and market recognizable phenomena.

It is ignorance based and absolutely unprovable and undemonstrable.

only those who are ignorant of economics, claim that.

You are quite wrong.
Only those ignorant of economics claims that there is a natural rate of unemployment

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You are the one presenting gossip rather than an argument

The natural rate of unemployment. Is gossip and dismissed as such

 

[danielpalos]

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. there is no appeal to ignorance of that capital inefficiency.

The claim that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment is a fictitious claim made in ignorance and there for can be dismissed with no evidence

nothing but bigotry? why should i believe You instead of any book on economics.

There is no intelligent book written which supports your ideas

Accusing others of bigotry is a false hood proving you have no sound argument

bigotry is all you have; why should I believe You?

I have no bigotry at all and you are a liar.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid argument.