Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[danielpalos]

it is a market based and market recognizable phenomena.

It is ignorance based and absolutely unprovable and undemonstrable.

only those who are ignorant of economics, claim that.

You are quite wrong.
Only those ignorant of economics claims that there is a natural rate of unemployment

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You are the one presenting gossip rather than an argument

The natural rate of unemployment. Is gossip and dismissed as such

i already looked up the definition.

the person who wrote that article has a much better argument than your simple appeal to ignorance.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The claim that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment is a fictitious claim made in ignorance and there for can be dismissed with no evidence

nothing but bigotry? why should i believe You instead of any book on economics.

There is no intelligent book written which supports your ideas

Accusing others of bigotry is a false hood proving you have no sound argument

bigotry is all you have; why should I believe You?

I have no bigotry at all and you are a liar.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid argument.

No you are wrong.

Claiming that there is a natural rate of unemployment is a fallacy and no argument need be made against a fallacy

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is ignorance based and absolutely unprovable and undemonstrable.

only those who are ignorant of economics, claim that.

You are quite wrong.
Only those ignorant of economics claims that there is a natural rate of unemployment

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You are the one presenting gossip rather than an argument

The natural rate of unemployment. Is gossip and dismissed as such

i already looked up the definition.

the person who wrote that article has a much better argument than your simple appeal to ignorance.

There is no such argument at all


So far you have failed demonstrate any support for your claim.

An article is opinion and nothing more.

Shared opinion is meaningless and worthless

Your claim is a fallacy

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but bigotry? why should i believe You instead of any book on economics.

There is no intelligent book written which supports your ideas

Accusing others of bigotry is a false hood proving you have no sound argument

bigotry is all you have; why should I believe You?

I have no bigotry at all and you are a liar.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid argument.

No you are wrong.

Claiming that there is a natural rate of unemployment is a fallacy and no argument need be made against a fallacy

you have nothing but an appeal to ignorance. i can find glossary definitions of the economic term.

 

[danielpalos]

only those who are ignorant of economics, claim that.

You are quite wrong.
Only those ignorant of economics claims that there is a natural rate of unemployment

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You are the one presenting gossip rather than an argument

The natural rate of unemployment. Is gossip and dismissed as such

i already looked up the definition.

the person who wrote that article has a much better argument than your simple appeal to ignorance.

There is no such argument at all


So far you have failed demonstrate any support for your claim.

An article is opinion and nothing more.

Shared opinion is meaningless and worthless

Your claim is a fallacy

my claim is that You are appealing to ignorance and relying on the bigotry of the right wing to waste everybody's time trolling and indulging the moral turpitude of bearing false witness for political purposes.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

yes, there is. and the Romans proved Government can solve all problems.

LOL...this is hilarious! The authoritarian Roman empire had the perfect form of government?
Surely I've missed some nuance in your claim.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, there is. and the Romans proved Government can solve all problems.

LOL...this is hilarious! The authoritarian Roman empire had the perfect form of government?
Surely I've missed some nuance in your claim.

aqueducts and roads made for more efficient private sector capitalism.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Perhaps the reason for his undying love of Joseph Stalin.

FDR lived the pampered life of a rich upper class son of the powerful Roosevelt family that flourished as merchants and land owners. Of course he always had all the money one could ever need and everyone around him did too
and probably the shock of finding out that not everyone was like him caused him to look for ways to ease his guilt
and right the inequity of some people having more than others.

He was a classic limousine liberal as so many on the left are and his policies proved to be idiotic and a his love of Keynesian economic theory kept the US mired in the depression long after it should have been.
He hated businessmen and thought Big Government could cure all problems. His God was vested in the presidency and congress of the US government. He was a fool.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

aqueducts and roads made for more efficient private sector capitalism.

So did a vast army of slave labor won by the expansionist militaristic Roman empire. You are more than a mere fool...you are an idiot.

 

[danielpalos]

aqueducts and roads made for more efficient private sector capitalism.

So did a vast army of slave labor won by the expansionist militaristic Roman empire. You are more than a mere fool...you are an idiot.

a mere expedience for the spoils of war. they invented the dole.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

a mere expedience for the spoils of war. they invented the dole.

Yes. Rome's economy was great because their war machine was mighty and far reaching. I suppose that's your formula for economic success: Take what you need, keep your vast underclass flowing and give away free bread to subdue the masses.

 

[danielpalos]

a mere expedience for the spoils of war. they invented the dole.

Yes. Rome's economy was great because their war machine was mighty and far reaching. I suppose that's your formula for economic success: Take what you need, keep your vast underclass flowing and give away free bread to subdue the masses.

they didn't have our Constitution. Government is socialism and was a simple social engineering issue for the Romans.

 

[hadit]

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

only the right wing is that dumb.

Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour. There is absolutely no reason to subsidize employers with Cheap labor in our First World economy.

That's not what's going on.

Yes, it is. A first world economy Costs.

Employers pay what the job is worth. They are not welfare distribution centers.

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No, the market sets the value of work. When the government does it, disaster follows.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Perhaps the reason for his undying love of Joseph Stalin.

FDR lived the pampered life of a rich upper class son of the powerful Roosevelt family that flourished as merchants and land owners. Of course he always had all the money one could ever need and everyone around him did too
and probably the shock of finding out that not everyone was like him caused him to look for ways to ease his guilt
and right the inequity of some people having more than others.

He was a classic limousine liberal as so many on the left are and his policies proved to be idiotic and a his love of Keynesian economic theory kept the US mired in the depression long after it should have been.
He hated businessmen and thought Big Government could cure all problems. His God was vested in the presidency and congress of the US government. He was a fool.

"He hated businessmen and thought Big Government ...."


Just not an American government, under the Constitution.

He wanted the sort of control his pals, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini had.


In July 5, 1935, in a letter to Representative Samuel B. Hill of Washington, the President manifested his contempt for the Constitution. Hill was chairman of the subcommittee studying the Guffey-Vinson bill to regulate the coal industry: the purpose of the legislation was to re-establish, for the coal industry, the NRA code system which the Supreme Court had unanimously declared unconstitutional.

Roosevelt wrote: "I hope your committee will not permit doubts as to constitutionality, however reasonable, to block the legislation.

This was the same Roosevelt who had sworn an oath on his 300 year old family Bible, to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 65.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Just not an American government, under the Constitution.

He wanted the sort of control his pals, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini had.

The attempts of Franklin Roosevelt to pack the court and the National Recovery Administration, that fixed wages and prices for goods, were unconstitutional overreaches of power .

The left loves America...but only their version of America is acceptable.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

they didn't have our Constitution.

No shit!
The idea of human and civil rights (except perhaps for land owning citizens of Rome) was absolutely unknown or even conceived of.

Government is socialism and was a simple social engineering issue for the Romans.

Saying Rome had a "socialist" government (if that is what you are claiming...your syntax is horrible) is a ridiculous claim even on the most simple of levels.
Because they kept the masses pacified with bread and circuses that's socialism to you?

You never fail to post utter nonsense.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is no intelligent book written which supports your ideas

Accusing others of bigotry is a false hood proving you have no sound argument

bigotry is all you have; why should I believe You?

I have no bigotry at all and you are a liar.

simply claiming that is a fallacy. you need a valid argument.

No you are wrong.

Claiming that there is a natural rate of unemployment is a fallacy and no argument need be made against a fallacy

you have nothing but an appeal to ignorance. i can find glossary definitions of the economic term.

The term is based on ignorance

Definitions mean nothing since every false concept can be explained with words which have definitions


Your claims are still a Fallacy and rooted in ignorance

 

[Soupnazi630]

You are quite wrong.
Only those ignorant of economics claims that there is a natural rate of unemployment

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You are the one presenting gossip rather than an argument

The natural rate of unemployment. Is gossip and dismissed as such

i already looked up the definition.

the person who wrote that article has a much better argument than your simple appeal to ignorance.

There is no such argument at all


So far you have failed demonstrate any support for your claim.

An article is opinion and nothing more.

Shared opinion is meaningless and worthless

Your claim is a fallacy

my claim is that You are appealing to ignorance and relying on the bigotry of the right wing to waste everybody's time trolling and indulging the moral turpitude of bearing false witness for political purposes.

Your claim is false.

You lie like a coward accusing me of bigotrt. Which only proves you lack any valid argument.

You base your claims on ignorant ideas such as a natural rate of unemployment.

 

[danielpalos]

only the right wing is that dumb.

Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour. There is absolutely no reason to subsidize employers with Cheap labor in our First World economy.

That's not what's going on.

Yes, it is. A first world economy Costs.

Employers pay what the job is worth. They are not welfare distribution centers.

Government fixes the Standard of Worth in our Republic. And, yes, they are market friendly means of income generation and redistribution.

No, the market sets the value of work. When the government does it, disaster follows.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. right wing propaganda and rhetoric is all they have.

we use fiat money.

 

[danielpalos]

they didn't have our Constitution.

No shit!
The idea of human and civil rights (except perhaps for land owning citizens of Rome) was absolutely unknown or even conceived of.

Government is socialism and was a simple social engineering issue for the Romans.

Saying Rome had a "socialist" government (if that is what you are claiming...your syntax is horrible) is a ridiculous claim even on the most simple of levels.
Because they kept the masses pacified with bread and circuses that's socialism to you?

You never fail to post utter nonsense.

yes; the dole was socialism.