Bizarro World: Trump Impeached for Biden's Corruption

[bripat9643]

You have the transcript go ahead use them I did

The transcript is not a legal document. The participants were not under oath and neither were the transcribers. Also, the transcript raises many questions that only Trump and his senior staff can answer.

You may love Trump and don't want to have his presidency cut short, I get that, but if he can refuse to be investigated/testify, expect the next president, whom you may not like so much, to do the same. What we'll have are imperial presidents with little or no checks on their power. How many times did Hillary testify in front or Congress? In the future such testimony will never occur.

There's a difference between being prosecuted and being smeared and railroaded. If the Dims want to have a real impeachment, then they can follow the process, ya know, like having actual witnesses and evidence. They got none.

Bullshit. There is plenty of evidence and there are plenty of witnesses.

They witnessed nothing, and there is no evidence that Trump committed any crime. Dim mind reading doesn't constitute evidence.

You would not admit it if everybody in Washington DC testified. A majority of voters also agree that Trump did it.

Truth isn't determined by a popular vote.

 

[bripat9643]

If you don't want to follow the legal process, then just admit it and stop all this fooling around.

What has been done that isn't legal?

Your impeaching a president with no crime being broken lol hello mcfly

Impeachment does not require a violation of a criminal statute. Even Republican witness Jonathan Turley agrees with that.

"Orange man bad" isn't sufficient grounds for impeachment, douchebag.

Showing your stupidity again.

"“While there's a high bar for what constitutes grounds for impeachment, an offense does not have to be indictable.”"

Jonathan Turley 2014

How does that contradict what I posted? Are you saying "orange man bad" is sufficient grounds for impeachment?

 

[bripat9643]

Resisting what? Trump and the GOP have not offered any alternative plans for healthcare.

Wow, really? You fricken loons resist anything and everything that Trump does or plans on doing.

I wasn't aware but you may be right. What has Trump done or planned for healthcare that was resisted by Dems? Or is Trump holding healthcare hostage for his wall?

House Democrats Just Blocked New Veterans Health Care Reform Bill

Democrats using popular veterans benefits bill to block Trump border wall

President Trump signed legislation paving the way for a major overhaul of the Department of Veterans Affairs and expanded access for veterans to VA-funded care in the private sector.

The measure, which passed both chambers of Congress last month with overwhelming bipartisan support, delivers on a key campaign promise for Trump, who pledged to provide veterans with more non-VA health care choices.

Obama did the same thing. Many of the things Trump has claimed credit for was signed into law by Obama.

Such as?

 

[Syriusly]

Like someone who defends his actions by asking "Who told you that?" the Democrats are defending Biden's Corruption by blaming Trump for pointing it out. What could be more ludicrous? If the MSM had the slightest amount of journalistic integrity, the current impeachment trial would be laughed off the front pages as a transparent political stunt by the Democrats to avoid criminal investigation of many of their leaders.

Instead, the MSM is conspiring in the greatest criminal coverup in our nation's history. Billions of laundered public dollars have passed under their dirty noses without notice or comment. Why? Because they are in, directly or indirectly, on the take. Just follow the money.

Feel free to show us any evidence of any crimes commited by the Bidens?

"No Democrat is 'defending/ Biden's "corruption- we are pointing out that you loyal Trumpskies are just smearing the Biden's without evidence and are just parroting what your Dear Leader tells you to say.

Show us the evidence.

lol- we know you will just keep on smearing everyone on Trump's enemies list- you Trumpskies don't believe in evidence.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

If you don't even know the president of Ukraine is a foreign national, you really have no business discussing the matter.

Ohhhh so now you have a quote from the president of Ukraine!?

LOL

You don't even know the president of Ukraine is a foreign national.

Who said that?

Thd idiot who's doing your typing.

No I didn’t.. can you read?

 

[Jitss617]

Ohhhh so now you have a quote from the president of Ukraine!?

LOL

You don't even know the president of Ukraine is a foreign national.

Who said that?

Thd idiot who's doing your typing.

No I didn’t.. can you read?

Umm ok

 

[alang1216]

God has a plan for everyone don’t get in the way

So if I killed you am I carrying out God's plan or getting in the way?

 

[Jitss617]

God has a plan for everyone don’t get in the way

So if I killed you am I carrying out God's plan or getting in the way?

Lol why because your angry?

 

[alang1216]

God has a plan for everyone don’t get in the way

So if I killed you am I carrying out God's plan or getting in the way?

Lol why because your angry?

I'm not angry, maybe God is angry at you and wants to you take down? Or maybe he just wants you with him with your Christ-like love of the poor and your fellow man?

 

[Jitss617]

God has a plan for everyone don’t get in the way

So if I killed you am I carrying out God's plan or getting in the way?

Lol why because your angry?

I'm not angry, maybe God is angry at you and wants to you take down? Or maybe he just wants you with him with your Christ-like love of the poor and your fellow man?

Huh

 

[alang1216]

God has a plan for everyone don’t get in the way

So if I killed you am I carrying out God's plan or getting in the way?

Lol why because your angry?

I'm not angry, maybe God is angry at you and wants to you take down? Or maybe he just wants you with him with your Christ-like love of the poor and your fellow man?

Huh

Nevermind. Thanks for playing.

 

[bripat9643]

whether you like or dislike Trump or Biden is irrelevant. the issue is the constitution and Biden's misconduct as well as Trump's crimes

I have yet to see any evidence of Biden's misconduct but I've seen plenty of evidence of Trump's crimes.

Then you shouldn't have a problem with Biden testifying, right?

I don't have a problem but I don't know what he might know about the impeachment issues.

You don't have a problem with Trump testifying under oath, right? Clinton did for his impeachment.

No he didn't, you fucking dumbass.

 

[bripat9643]

No he didn't, turd. He testified in the Paula Jones lawsuit under oath, not in his impeachment.

Once again the leftwinger lies about the facts.

No lie. Clinton's impeachment included excerpts from videotaped grand jury testimony given by Clinton. Shouldn't Trump have to do the same?

You have the transcript go ahead use them I did

The transcript is not a legal document. The participants were not under oath and neither were the transcribers. Also, the transcript raises many questions that only Trump and his senior staff can answer.

You may love Trump and don't want to have his presidency cut short, I get that, but if he can refuse to be investigated/testify, expect the next president, whom you may not like so much, to do the same. What we'll have are imperial presidents with little or no checks on their power. How many times did Hillary testify in front or Congress? In the future such testimony will never occur.

There's a difference between being prosecuted and being smeared and railroaded. If the Dims want to have a real impeachment, then they can follow the process, ya know, like having actual witnesses and evidence. They got none.

We both know that if the Dems went through the courts to compel witnesses Trump would fight them and the cases would drag on for years. Trump would die of old age before anything was decided. Is that justice or obstruction of justice?

Yeah, sometimes following the law can be tough. Sucks, doesn't it?

 

[Faun]

No lie. Clinton's impeachment included excerpts from videotaped grand jury testimony given by Clinton. Shouldn't Trump have to do the same?

You have the transcript go ahead use them I did

The transcript is not a legal document. The participants were not under oath and neither were the transcribers. Also, the transcript raises many questions that only Trump and his senior staff can answer.

You may love Trump and don't want to have his presidency cut short, I get that, but if he can refuse to be investigated/testify, expect the next president, whom you may not like so much, to do the same. What we'll have are imperial presidents with little or no checks on their power. How many times did Hillary testify in front or Congress? In the future such testimony will never occur.

There's a difference between being prosecuted and being smeared and railroaded. If the Dims want to have a real impeachment, then they can follow the process, ya know, like having actual witnesses and evidence. They got none.

We both know that if the Dems went through the courts to compel witnesses Trump would fight them and the cases would drag on for years. Trump would die of old age before anything was decided. Is that justice or obstruction of justice?

Yeah, sometimes following the law can be tough. Sucks, doesn't it?

Sucks for Impeached Trump, he got impeached.

 

[Jitss617]

You have the transcript go ahead use them I did

The transcript is not a legal document. The participants were not under oath and neither were the transcribers. Also, the transcript raises many questions that only Trump and his senior staff can answer.

You may love Trump and don't want to have his presidency cut short, I get that, but if he can refuse to be investigated/testify, expect the next president, whom you may not like so much, to do the same. What we'll have are imperial presidents with little or no checks on their power. How many times did Hillary testify in front or Congress? In the future such testimony will never occur.

There's a difference between being prosecuted and being smeared and railroaded. If the Dims want to have a real impeachment, then they can follow the process, ya know, like having actual witnesses and evidence. They got none.

We both know that if the Dems went through the courts to compel witnesses Trump would fight them and the cases would drag on for years. Trump would die of old age before anything was decided. Is that justice or obstruction of justice?

Yeah, sometimes following the law can be tough. Sucks, doesn't it?

Sucks for Impeached Trump, he got impeached.

Who’s your president? Lol

 

[theHawk]

No one “ owns threads “

and Biden helping get rid of a corrupt prosecutor is not even CLOSE to a corrupt act.

In fact it’s the opposite

According to Dems merely threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine is illegal, and Joe bragged about making such a threat on video.

You’re also ignoring the elephant in the room, Hunter Biden’s kickback paychecks he collected from Burisma in return for getting that prosecutor off their back.

 

[Faun]

The transcript is not a legal document. The participants were not under oath and neither were the transcribers. Also, the transcript raises many questions that only Trump and his senior staff can answer.

You may love Trump and don't want to have his presidency cut short, I get that, but if he can refuse to be investigated/testify, expect the next president, whom you may not like so much, to do the same. What we'll have are imperial presidents with little or no checks on their power. How many times did Hillary testify in front or Congress? In the future such testimony will never occur.

There's a difference between being prosecuted and being smeared and railroaded. If the Dims want to have a real impeachment, then they can follow the process, ya know, like having actual witnesses and evidence. They got none.

We both know that if the Dems went through the courts to compel witnesses Trump would fight them and the cases would drag on for years. Trump would die of old age before anything was decided. Is that justice or obstruction of justice?

Yeah, sometimes following the law can be tough. Sucks, doesn't it?

Sucks for Impeached Trump, he got impeached.

Who’s your president? Lol

Impeached Trump.

 

[Jitss617]

There's a difference between being prosecuted and being smeared and railroaded. If the Dims want to have a real impeachment, then they can follow the process, ya know, like having actual witnesses and evidence. They got none.

We both know that if the Dems went through the courts to compel witnesses Trump would fight them and the cases would drag on for years. Trump would die of old age before anything was decided. Is that justice or obstruction of justice?

Yeah, sometimes following the law can be tough. Sucks, doesn't it?

Sucks for Impeached Trump, he got impeached.

Who’s your president? Lol

Impeached Trump.

Yes you accused him and he will be acquitted do you even know what impeached means? Heheh

 

[Faun]

We both know that if the Dems went through the courts to compel witnesses Trump would fight them and the cases would drag on for years. Trump would die of old age before anything was decided. Is that justice or obstruction of justice?

Yeah, sometimes following the law can be tough. Sucks, doesn't it?

Sucks for Impeached Trump, he got impeached.

Who’s your president? Lol

Impeached Trump.

Yes you accused him and he will be acquitted do you even know what impeached means? Heheh

Yes, and Impeached Trump is impeached. It's going to follow him through history like it did with Johnson, Clinton and Nixon (who resigned to avoid impeachment).

 

[Jitss617]

Yeah, sometimes following the law can be tough. Sucks, doesn't it?

Sucks for Impeached Trump, he got impeached.

Who’s your president? Lol

Impeached Trump.

Yes you accused him and he will be acquitted do you even know what impeached means? Heheh

Yes, and Impeached Trump is impeached. It's going to follow him through history like it did with Johnson, Clinton and Nixon (who resigned to avoid impeachment).

Yes Presidents are accused all the time lol what’s your point?