🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Black Lives Matter Exposed

You mean to tell us the Blacks on video and photographs looting and burning Democrat-run cities do so because white supremacists make them do it?

No ... we're saying white supremacist videographers and photographers are only recording black violence ... you might be surprised how few minorities work in the media ... whites only club ... the racist community eat this stuff up, exactly what they want to hear ... 2,000 peaceful protesters doesn't sell antacid on TV, the one guy who throws a brick does ... swallow, don't spit ...

Bullshit. There is enough white ANTIFA or white leftists that I have seen on video as well. Collectively, it is BLM and ANTIFA and their useful idiots that are sponsoring and executing the majority of the Burning, Looting, and Murdering. I don’t think it’s whitey the cameraman only showing Black violence. To your point, peaceful protesting doesn’t sell antacid but that does not mean selectively showing Black violence sells more.
 
Bullshit. There is enough white ANTIFA or white leftists that I have seen on video as well. Collectively, it is BLM and ANTIFA and their useful idiots that are sponsoring and executing the majority of the Burning, Looting, and Murdering. I don’t think it’s whitey the cameraman only showing Black violence. To your point, peaceful protesting doesn’t sell antacid but that does not mean selectively showing Black violence sells more.

Ah ... you must be the type of person that gets their news from a variety of sources, each with their point-of-view, and then synthesis your own opinion ... which is what all of us are supposed to be doing ... if this is true, then you should know perfectly well that some sources are racist ... and there's racist antacid manufacturers who are happily catering to the racist audience ...

Or do you think only cute white girls get kidnapped in the USA? ...

Big strong Black man kneels during the National Anthem ... it's a national disgrace ...
Cute white girl in an American Flag bikini ... 672 million "likes" on Facebook ...

That's racism ... institutional racism ...

From 4 USC Section 8:
Subsection (d) - "The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free."
[Emphasis mine]
 
Bullshit. There is enough white ANTIFA or white leftists that I have seen on video as well. Collectively, it is BLM and ANTIFA and their useful idiots that are sponsoring and executing the majority of the Burning, Looting, and Murdering. I don’t think it’s whitey the cameraman only showing Black violence. To your point, peaceful protesting doesn’t sell antacid but that does not mean selectively showing Black violence sells more.

Ah ... you must be the type of person that gets their news from a variety of sources, each with their point-of-view, and then synthesis your own opinion ... which is what all of us are supposed to be doing ... if this is true, then you should know perfectly well that some sources are racist ... and there's racist antacid manufacturers who are happily catering to the racist audience ...

Or do you think only cute white girls get kidnapped in the USA? ...

Big strong Black man kneels during the National Anthem ... it's a national disgrace ...
Cute white girl in an American Flag bikini ... 672 million "likes" on Facebook ...

That's racism ... institutional racism ...

From 4 USC Section 8:
Subsection (d) - "The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free."
[Emphasis mine]
I know that many of the sources are biased with a left leaning. If anything, most of the content would be showing all of these white racists instigating riots, looting, and violence.
 
No, they are a Marxist organization.

All African-Americans are Marxists? ... do you know what "stereotype" means? ... didn't think so ...





No, BLM IS a Marxist group. They DON'T matter. In fact they are actively making things worse for blacks all over the country, and especially in the cities where they have been burning down businesses that cater to the black community.
They aren't making things worse for blacks. And it's high time some whites understand that Americas white racist system is a form of fascism. BLM have not been the ones burinng things. White supremacists have been caught on numerous occasions inciting violence at BLM protests.

BLM is turning out racist faster than Tommy Johns makes sandwiches.
 
No, BLM IS a Marxist group. They DON'T matter. In fact they are actively making things worse for blacks all over the country, and especially in the cities where they have been burning down businesses that cater to the black community.

So ... Black Live don't Matter to you? ...

Is "Marxist" some trigger word for you that you don't understand? ... or are you admitting that Black Lives are no better than serfs ... better dead than chatty ...
I think black lives matter to every one, just not Black Lives Matter. To almost everyone all lives matter regardless of the color of their skin. To me a black person's life is no more important than that of a white person, a brown person, a red person or a yellow person. To say black lives matter is a racist position.
 
Bullshit. There is enough white ANTIFA or white leftists that I have seen on video as well. Collectively, it is BLM and ANTIFA and their useful idiots that are sponsoring and executing the majority of the Burning, Looting, and Murdering. I don’t think it’s whitey the cameraman only showing Black violence. To your point, peaceful protesting doesn’t sell antacid but that does not mean selectively showing Black violence sells more.

Ah ... you must be the type of person that gets their news from a variety of sources, each with their point-of-view, and then synthesis your own opinion ... which is what all of us are supposed to be doing ... if this is true, then you should know perfectly well that some sources are racist ... and there's racist antacid manufacturers who are happily catering to the racist audience ...

Or do you think only cute white girls get kidnapped in the USA? ...

Big strong Black man kneels during the National Anthem ... it's a national disgrace ...
Cute white girl in an American Flag bikini ... 672 million "likes" on Facebook ...

That's racism ... institutional racism ...

From 4 USC Section 8:
Subsection (d) - "The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free."
[Emphasis mine]

A big strong black, white, Asian, Indian whatever does not do anything for me, a beautiful woman, not caring about race, in a bikini, flag or no flag would be fine by me.

No institutional racism, however it does sound like sexism.
 
No, BLM IS a Marxist group. They DON'T matter. In fact they are actively making things worse for blacks all over the country, and especially in the cities where they have been burning down businesses that cater to the black community.

So ... Black Live don't Matter to you? ...

Is "Marxist" some trigger word for you that you don't understand? ... or are you admitting that Black Lives are no better than serfs ... better dead than chatty ...






You're not very good at trying to be clever. Read what I said again.
 
Andy McCarthy

@AndrewCMcCarthy

·
Sep 6

It’s a Straight Line from Biden to BLM ... if you oppose the Left, your speech is incitement, as is your silence ... and, for that matter, your existence.

Exactly how are the Trump deplorables to blame? How are they instigating the violence that Biden now “unequivocally” condemns (after remaining largely mum, while his running mate, Senator Kamala Harris, was promoting a fund to bail out rioters)?

Why, by saying things that offend the Left’s hair-trigger sensibilities, that’s how.

If you are a conservative, a Republican, and/or a Trump supporter, you offend by backing candidates and policies the Left opposes. And don’t even think about doing it quietly because, it turns out, “silence is violence,” too — your very existence equates to offensive speech. There is only one way out for you: submission. You need to get with the program that capitalism is white supremacy, private property is colonialist exploitation, noticing the criminal records of criminals is racism, and supporting the arrest of those criminals when they forcibly resist is police brutality.

Wait a second, you’re thinking. Biden’s not with that program. He even says he’s no “radical socialist with a soft spot for rioters.” He’s a moderate, right?

Well, truth be told, he’s a hack. For half a century, he’s blown with the progressive gales, trying to stay on whatever seemed to be the popular side on a given day. In favor of using force in Iraq but against the Iraq war. For the “Russia Reset” after Moscow annexed parts of Georgia, but wannabe scourge of Russia after Moscow annexed parts of Ukraine. Back in 1994, he labored to brand tough Clinton crime legislation as the “Biden Bill”; now, with the Left decrying that law as the foundation of America’s racist “carceral state,” he’d prefer to forget the whole thing, and hopes you will, too.
 
Biden supports the Left’s radical revision of the First Amendment, codified in the Obama-Biden administration-backed U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18. In a nutshell, it is the “heckler’s veto” — though would that the Left’s shock troops contented themselves with heckling.

Resolution 16/18 is a blatantly unconstitutional provision the Obama-Biden government pushed to support Islamist regimes. Ostensibly, it is about religious liberty. In reality, it is the Left’s template for speech suppression.

The trick is to turn the once simple concept of incitement on its head.

The resolution purports to render unlawful any speech about religion that “constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence.” Its transparent purpose is to insulate Islamic doctrine from critical examination, notwithstanding that fundamentalists unabashedly exploit scripture to justify and promote terrorism.

In the Soviet style, the Left sustains its program with a combination of fantasy, indoctrination, and suppression. American history, for example, becomes the 1619 Project — the republic as an enterprise to perpetuate slavery. The Big Lie is cemented by Pulitzer prizes, K–12 curricula, and reparations bills; it is protected by attaching the smear of racism to naysayers who dare show that the project is farcical.

 
Progressives have created their own fantasy version of Islam. Its defining tenet — indeed, its only known tenet — is anti-violence. You are to see terrorism as innately un-Islamic activity. Any claim that scripture justifies violence — i.e., any reading of what belligerent scriptures unambiguously say — is angrily rebuked as a distortion of the “true” Islam. Jihad itself is transmogrified into an internal struggle to become a better person, not a doctrinal command to wage war for the purpose of establishing the dominion of sharia (Islam’s law and cultural norms).

This is fraud. Obviously, it is not necessary for Muslims to construe their scriptures as a command to holy war in modern times, and most do not. Literally, though, the doctrine says what it says. To a greater or lesser extent, then, a not insignificant percentage of Muslims accepts this sharia-supremacist interpretation of Islam, which is backed by centuries of fundamentalist scholarship. Common sense says this is why there is so much jihadist terrorism. It is why many Islamic societies still hew to a literalist interpretation of sharia standards, endorsing discrimination, repression, and cruel corporate punishments that seem barbaric by today’s sensibilities.

That is reality. To acknowledge it as such is not to call for violence against Muslims. It is to resist violence by understanding both why some Muslims are committing it and why reformist Muslims need our support in their courageous work. Dealing with reality head-on is what adults do. It is critical thinking. The objective is to solve difficult problems, not tell stories about them.

The Obama-Biden administration rejected this approach. Their substitute is a fantasy, peddled tirelessly and protected by shutting down all debate — indeed, by making their opposition’s position unutterable, not just by intimidation but by the force of law.

Our free-expression right should make this impossible. At issue here is political speech, the exchange of ideas in examining a threat, in order to develop sensible security policy. That’s the First Amendment’s core. There have always been exceptions to free speech, however, and they include incitement: speech intended to spur people to violence and other lawlessness.
 

Forum List

Back
Top