Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
About UsNo new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1
So that's where half the shit on this board comes from! I've always wonderedAbout UsNo new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1
Credibility we don't need no stinkin ' credibility. !
It's not hard to find.when a poster posts a link and you open it , look for the home page of their source and then find the About us or mission statement.So that's where half the shit on this board comes from! I've always wonderedAbout UsNo new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1
Credibility we don't need no stinkin ' credibility. !
When Paul Revere, William Dawes, Dr. Samuel Prescott, and others, rode to warn rebel leaders in Lexington and Concord that soldiers were heading their way, looking mainly for the stores of ammunition that were being stockpiled by rebel colonists and an excuse to arrest the leaders, they would never have shouted “The British are coming!” because, simply put, they were all still British. Imagine someone running down a road in Concord, MA today shouting “The Americans are coming!” and you’ve got the idea.Language, from Guthrie on the June 13 Today show were typical: Here’s the gun argument:
They’re a weapon of war. They’re not a hunting rifle.
Thing is, Paul Revere never said, "The deer are coming, the deer are coming."
My gun rights stem from the 1700's. To protect myself from government, not wildlife.
When Paul Revere, William Dawes, Dr. Samuel Prescott, and others, rode to warn rebel leaders in Lexington and Concord that soldiers were heading their way, looking mainly for the stores of ammunition that were being stockpiled by rebel colonists and an excuse to arrest the leaders, they would never have shouted “The British are coming!” because, simply put, they were all still British. Imagine someone running down a road in Concord, MA today shouting “The Americans are coming!” and you’ve got the idea.
The link's no doubt lame, and I don't think any rational person would attempt to argue that NYC's gun control legislation has saved lives (and possibly our greatest city). And that's really the problem with the thread and link: it attempts to paint with too broad a brush.It's not hard to find.when a poster posts a link and you open it , look for the home page of their source and then find the About us or mission statement.So that's where half the shit on this board comes from! I've always wonderedAbout UsNo new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1
Credibility we don't need no stinkin ' credibility. !
That will give you a good idea on the bias or objectivity of a source.
Not from a legally constituted govt, they aren't.Language, from Guthrie on the June 13 Today show were typical: Here’s the gun argument:
They’re a weapon of war. They’re not a hunting rifle.
Thing is, Paul Revere never said, "The deer are coming, the deer are coming."
My gun rights stem from the 1700's. To protect myself from government, not wildlife.
So that's where half the shit on this board comes from! I've always wonderedAbout UsNo new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1
Credibility we don't need no stinkin ' credibility. !
Day late and a dollar short much.When Paul Revere, William Dawes, Dr. Samuel Prescott, and others, rode to warn rebel leaders in Lexington and Concord that soldiers were heading their way, looking mainly for the stores of ammunition that were being stockpiled by rebel colonists and an excuse to arrest the leaders, they would never have shouted “The British are coming!” because, simply put, they were all still British. Imagine someone running down a road in Concord, MA today shouting “The Americans are coming!” and you’ve got the idea.
OK, "The Terrorists are coming, ISIS is Coming, The Terrorists are here, ISIS is here" You Got the idea?
Who's "our?So that's where half the shit on this board comes from! I've always wonderedAbout UsNo new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1
Credibility we don't need no stinkin ' credibility. !
You haven't begun to feel our pain --- trying to reason with at least 80% of you and yours.
Bullshit but your ignorance is not my problem.View attachment 79007
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State....
Daws, our guns rights have nothing to do with hunting food and everything to do with freedom. We are a well regulated militia, as long as our right is not infringed upon. Exactly what the Obama/Clinton regime want to get rid of. They are the reason for the right. According to our founding fathers, this isn't a right. It is considered a necessity.
Who's "our?
Why is it you clowns need to use argumentum ad populum to post an obviously personal opinion?
As to "reason" that's a completely alien concept to you because reason requires logic and objectivity.
False! we the people means everyone .Who's "our?
Why is it you clowns need to use argumentum ad populum to post an obviously personal opinion?
As to "reason" that's a completely alien concept to you because reason requires logic and objectivity.
You know, "We the people..."
They are OUR Rights and OUR GUNS.
Obama is not coming for your rights. And the militia was only intended to protect against external threats or a govt that ignored established laws and elections.View attachment 79007
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State....
Daws, our guns rights have nothing to do with hunting food and everything to do with freedom. We are a well regulated militia, as long as our right is not infringed upon. Exactly what the Obama/Clinton regime want to get rid of. They are the reason for the right. According to our founding fathers, this isn't a right. It is considered a necessity.
my favorite part was when she said we are a well regulated militia .Obama is not coming for your rights. And the militia was only intended to protect against external threats or a govt that ignored established laws and elections.View attachment 79007
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State....
Daws, our guns rights have nothing to do with hunting food and everything to do with freedom. We are a well regulated militia, as long as our right is not infringed upon. Exactly what the Obama/Clinton regime want to get rid of. They are the reason for the right. According to our founding fathers, this isn't a right. It is considered a necessity.
