Blind leading the blind...

[daws101]

100% of criminals agree with you.
Nice end run around your no loophole bullshit!

Why should the federal government be involved in them??
It's been the same way forever, it ain't broke why fix it. Dumbass

It's been broken forever and you benefit from that condition.

Not at all, private sales are none of the federal government's business. dip shit

False! Assuming the weapon is registered its already federal government's business.
Fail.

Gun registration is unconstitutional, and unnecessary. Dumbass

Sorry, Mandatory Gun Registration Is Constitutional
Another epic fail.

 

[Rustic]

Why should the federal government be involved in them??
It's been the same way forever, it ain't broke why fix it. Dumbass

It's been broken forever and you benefit from that condition.

Not at all, private sales are none of the federal government's business. dip shit

False! Assuming the weapon is registered its already federal government's business.
Fail.

Gun registration is unconstitutional, and unnecessary. Dumbass

Sorry, Mandatory Gun Registration Is Constitutional
Another epic fail.

Na, not really.
It's none of the federal governments business who owns what, it serves no good purpose. Dumbass

 

[Nosmo King]

No new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

 

[Rustic]

No new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

Are you stupid?
EnForce the current laws, tell people to fuck off that want to put in new frivolous laws...

 

[daws101]

It's been broken forever and you benefit from that condition.

Not at all, private sales are none of the federal government's business. dip shit

False! Assuming the weapon is registered its already federal government's business.
Fail.

Gun registration is unconstitutional, and unnecessary. Dumbass

Sorry, Mandatory Gun Registration Is Constitutional
Another epic fail.

Na, not really.
It's none of the federal governments business who owns what, it serves no good purpose. Dumbass

Yes really !
Can you rationalize any harder?

 

[daws101]

No new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

Are you stupid?
EnForce the current laws, tell people to fuck off that want to put in new frivolous laws...

Tantrum!

 

[Nosmo King]

No new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

Are you stupid?
EnForce the current laws, tell people to fuck off that want to put in new frivolous laws...

Expanded background checks, closing the gun show loophole, no fly/no buy. Most people support these regulations. And you call them 'frivolous'.

 

[Rustic]

No new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

Are you stupid?
EnForce the current laws, tell people to fuck off that want to put in new frivolous laws...

Expanded background checks, closing the gun show loophole, no fly/no buy. Most people support these regulations. And you call them 'frivolous'.

There's no such thing as a gun show loophole, and none of you guys can define expanded background checks - what they even mean...
Whatever the progressives come up with it's always going to be frivolous

 

[bendog]

Susan Collins and Graham are progressives? A maj of NRA members are progressives?

 

[daws101]

No new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

Are you stupid?
EnForce the current laws, tell people to fuck off that want to put in new frivolous laws...

Expanded background checks, closing the gun show loophole, no fly/no buy. Most people support these regulations. And you call them 'frivolous'.

There's no such thing as a gun show loophole, and none of you guys can define expanded background checks - what they even mean...
Whatever the progressives come up with it's always going to be frivolous

bullshit !
Experts warn that the phrase "gun show loophole" is imprecise at best. But people do buy guns without having to undergo background checks.

Several experts said the phrase "gun show loophole" isn’t the most accurate way to describe the gap in the law.
None

 

[daws101]

. Federally licensed gun sellers are required to run background checks. But not all sellers are required to be licensed. Some of those unlicensed sellers sell at gun shows.

2. It’s not clear how many sellers are licensed and how many are not. Some studies are out of date.


"There is a huge loophole in federal law, but it isn't for gun shows," UCLA law professor Adam Winkler said. "What is called the gun-show loophole is misnamed. It should be the ‘private sale loophole’ or the ‘background check loophole.’ ... The reason people talk about gun shows is that they are easily accessible marketplaces for people who don't want to be subject to a background check to find non-licensed gun sellers."
"The term ‘loophole’ suggests that it was a minor, unintended flaw in the design of the law, something inadvertently overlooked by lawmakers, when it was actually the very intentional result of a carefully worked-out political compromise between those who wanted background checks on all gun acquisitions and those who did not want any at all," he said.

None

 

[Rustic]

No new laws will even save one life... No proof to the contrary.
lol
Exploiting Orlando: Nets Advance Anti-Gun Agenda By 8 to 1

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

Are you stupid?
EnForce the current laws, tell people to fuck off that want to put in new frivolous laws...

Expanded background checks, closing the gun show loophole, no fly/no buy. Most people support these regulations. And you call them 'frivolous'.

There's no such thing as a gun show loophole, and none of you guys can define expanded background checks - what they even mean...
Whatever the progressives come up with it's always going to be frivolous

bullshit !
Experts warn that the phrase "gun show loophole" is imprecise at best. But people do buy guns without having to undergo background checks.

Several experts said the phrase "gun show loophole" isn’t the most accurate way to describe the gap in the law.
None

No background check is necessary on private sales, the federal government does not have the moral authority to insist on such a thing.

 

[daws101]

Realize this:

We instituted speed limits on public thoroughfares. People still speed. People still die in speed related crashes.

Should we never again impose a speed limit because speed limits have proven not to be 100% effective in eliminating speed related accidents? Would you eliminated, roll back and forget all about speed limits due to their failure to completely eliminate speeding?

This is the ham handed logic you gun nuts espouse. Because there is no panacea, no laws should be enacted.

Are you stupid?
EnForce the current laws, tell people to fuck off that want to put in new frivolous laws...

Expanded background checks, closing the gun show loophole, no fly/no buy. Most people support these regulations. And you call them 'frivolous'.

There's no such thing as a gun show loophole, and none of you guys can define expanded background checks - what they even mean...
Whatever the progressives come up with it's always going to be frivolous

bullshit !
Experts warn that the phrase "gun show loophole" is imprecise at best. But people do buy guns without having to undergo background checks.

Several experts said the phrase "gun show loophole" isn’t the most accurate way to describe the gap in the law.
None

No background check is necessary on private sales, the federal government does not have the moral authority to insist on such a thing.

moral authority ! lol
there is none in the law and yes the government has the authority ..

 

[bendog]

Try selling private property and not recording the deed. LOL

 

[daws101]

Try selling private property and not recording the deed. LOL

he probably has .
could be one of the reasons he's pissed of about this,