Blue Wave Drought: Reuters Shows a SIX POINT LEAD for Republicans

In your example, Trump is Hitler. Is that really what you intended to say?


In that example, Trump is the victim not Hitler, you sad little hack.
How is trump the victim? He wasn't raided. Trump filled the courts. The investigations are being done by his own Justice Department. Trump told Comey if anyone was involved with Russia, to investigate them, which his own Justice Department as he asked.

Trump is Hitler in that analogy.

:lmao:


Trump is the victim of Obabble's statist spying.
Dayam, you rightwingnuts are fucking retarded. :cuckoo:

First and foremost, Trump was not spied on...

On Fox News, of all places, Trump’s ‘spy’ claim is debunked by Trey Gowdy and even Judge Napolitano

Secondly, your fellow yahoo said nothing about spying. He said Hitler's courts approved of a lot of raids.

Trump wasn't raided. He's not the victim in that analogy. He's the leader who ordered the raids. Trump told Comey to investigate whomever was involved in Russia.

:lmao::lmao::lmao:


Obabble spied on Trump.

You can spin it all you want, but in RealityLand, normal people understand that it was spying and is Worse Than Watergate. That's why you loons are so desperate to cover it up.
Holyfuckingshit! :cuckoo:

Even rightwing Fox news says it's not true.

As do Republican leaders who've been shown the evidence.

As does Trump's own Department of Justice.

The only ones still claiming that idiocy are Trump, who lies half a dozen times per day on average; and his brain-dead sycophants who believe whatever he says even though they can't prove it.
 
In that example, Trump is the victim not Hitler, you sad little hack.
How is trump the victim? He wasn't raided. Trump filled the courts. The investigations are being done by his own Justice Department. Trump told Comey if anyone was involved with Russia, to investigate them, which his own Justice Department as he asked.

Trump is Hitler in that analogy.

:lmao:


Trump is the victim of Obabble's statist spying.
Dayam, you rightwingnuts are fucking retarded. :cuckoo:

First and foremost, Trump was not spied on...

On Fox News, of all places, Trump’s ‘spy’ claim is debunked by Trey Gowdy and even Judge Napolitano

Secondly, your fellow yahoo said nothing about spying. He said Hitler's courts approved of a lot of raids.

Trump wasn't raided. He's not the victim in that analogy. He's the leader who ordered the raids. Trump told Comey to investigate whomever was involved in Russia.

:lmao::lmao::lmao:


Obabble spied on Trump.

You can spin it all you want, but in RealityLand, normal people understand that it was spying and is Worse Than Watergate. That's why you loons are so desperate to cover it up.
Holyfuckingshit! :cuckoo:

Even rightwing Fox news says it's not true.

As do Republican leaders who've been shown the evidence.

As does Trump's own Department of Justice.

The only ones still claiming that idiocy are Trump, who lies half a dozen times per day on average; and his brain-dead sycophants who believe whatever he says even though they can't prove it.


How amusing. Now you believe Fox News.

What you are relying upon is not the editorial policy standing of FNC on this matter. It's the opinion of a couple of folks, one of who is quite obviously aligned with the Permanent Fusion Party which is trying to sabotage Trump.
 
How is trump the victim? He wasn't raided. Trump filled the courts. The investigations are being done by his own Justice Department. Trump told Comey if anyone was involved with Russia, to investigate them, which his own Justice Department as he asked.

Trump is Hitler in that analogy.

:lmao:


Trump is the victim of Obabble's statist spying.
Dayam, you rightwingnuts are fucking retarded. :cuckoo:

First and foremost, Trump was not spied on...

On Fox News, of all places, Trump’s ‘spy’ claim is debunked by Trey Gowdy and even Judge Napolitano

Secondly, your fellow yahoo said nothing about spying. He said Hitler's courts approved of a lot of raids.

Trump wasn't raided. He's not the victim in that analogy. He's the leader who ordered the raids. Trump told Comey to investigate whomever was involved in Russia.

:lmao::lmao::lmao:


Obabble spied on Trump.

You can spin it all you want, but in RealityLand, normal people understand that it was spying and is Worse Than Watergate. That's why you loons are so desperate to cover it up.
Holyfuckingshit! :cuckoo:

Even rightwing Fox news says it's not true.

As do Republican leaders who've been shown the evidence.

As does Trump's own Department of Justice.

The only ones still claiming that idiocy are Trump, who lies half a dozen times per day on average; and his brain-dead sycophants who believe whatever he says even though they can't prove it.


How amusing. Now you believe Fox News.

What you are relying upon is not the editorial policy standing of FNC on this matter. It's the opinion of a couple of folks, one of who is quite obviously aligned with the Permanent Fusion Party which is trying to sabotage Trump.
Yeah, there's this thing in law that when a witness being cross-examined provides helpful testimony to the opposition, the opposition accepts it as truthful.

And it's not just Fox news. It's virtually every major news outlet, left and right.

And they're only quoting Republican leaders who where shown the evidence who are also saying Trump was not spied on.

You wingnuts never know when to throw in the towel.
 
Keep telling yourself that before bed, Avatar, if it helps you sleep.

If you really believe Mueller does not have a solid case, despite indictments of 19 people and 3 businesses, 4 plea deals and convictions, etc. (this being the tip of the iceberg), then you don't believe in factual, objective evidence.

oh I forgot. Prosecuting nobodies for crimes that have nothing to do with Russia collusion is some how evidence the president colluded with Russia
Tough, Avatar. You can saying such things that mean nothing. You will melt when Mueller releases his findings.

Why would I melt when Mueller releases his findings?
 
No, TOT, that is not how it works. The FBI is not the Gestapo, Sessions is not Goering, though Trump at times displays the megalomania of Hitler.

Do you understand why the Fourth amendment exists?

HInt: it's not because the Founders trusted the federal government to investigate citizens
 
Avatar, the alt right is yelling THIS and THAT and THE OTHER with absolutely no factual, objective evidence.

That is the point. The alt right is demagoguing, albeit very poorly.
 
The blue wave is swirling down the toilet bowl along with snowflake dreams of impeaching Trump. If Republicans retain control of the House, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Stozk, Page, Ohre, Yates and Clinton will all be wearing orange jump suits.

Blue Wave Drought: Reuters Shows a SIX POINT LEAD for Republicans | Sparta Report

The Democrats have gone from a 16 point lead in CNN’s generic ballot poll in December of 2017 to a 6 point deficit against the Republicans with Reuter’s polling just released today. Their “blue wave” hopes have seemingly vanished in the polling as the good economic and political news for President Donald Trump keeps pouring in. The activist left base of the Democrats are increasingly worried —or deluded— as they see a surprising resurgence of Republican chances to keep the House of Representatives in the November 2018 elections.

What does the Reuters poll show?

The Reuters poll has been showing some very favorable numbers for President Trump and Republicans for several weeks now, after they initially discounted their poll as a “blip” when they showed the approval ratings for Trump jumping nearly 20 points from their previous week.

220518poll.jpg


Democrats will need to have at least a 7 to 10 percent lead in the generic congressional ballot polling to be able to have a chance to pickup enough seats in the House to take over the chamber. With a Republican lead of 6 points, this is ten points in the wrong direction and the trend-lines are not favorable to Democrats as they screw up their golden opportunity to have their own 1994, 2010, 2014 scenario.

Come on fellas, have we not learned anything about how little value there is in these polls. The republicans holding both houses of congress after the mid terms would be almost as shocking as Trump winning the election. Repubs would be wise to prepare to deal with at least a split congress.
If the Dims take over the house, then the investigation into the crimes of the Obama administration will get swept under the rug. We can't allow that to happen.

Come on man. BO is gone. He will never be punished for Whatever crimes he may have committed. Just as nearly every POTUS before him, he has ridden off into the sunset. He can’t be president again, so whatever he did doesn’t matter. Whatever Hellary and Bill, or George and his dad did is history. Don’t spend your time on defeating someone not in the game.
 
Reuters is just trying to stir up the Democrat base to get them to come out, and vote in a midterm election.
 
Avatar, the alt right is yelling THIS and THAT and THE OTHER with absolutely no factual, objective evidence.

That is the point. The alt right is demagoguing, albeit very poorly.
The Alt Right is insignificant. They have hardly anyone that subscribe to their ideology, no one of consequence takes them seriously and they have no institutional power. It's stupid to bring them up because no one knew what they were until the liberal media brought them up in 2016 as a convenient boogeyman.
 
Avatar, the alt right is yelling THIS and THAT and THE OTHER with absolutely no factual, objective evidence.

That is the point. The alt right is demagoguing, albeit very poorly.

And yet you don't seem to have an issue with the left yelling about Russian collusion as an excuse for losing the election for nearly two years with no factual objective evidence.
 
The blue wave is swirling down the toilet bowl along with snowflake dreams of impeaching Trump. If Republicans retain control of the House, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Stozk, Page, Ohre, Yates and Clinton will all be wearing orange jump suits.

Blue Wave Drought: Reuters Shows a SIX POINT LEAD for Republicans | Sparta Report

The Democrats have gone from a 16 point lead in CNN’s generic ballot poll in December of 2017 to a 6 point deficit against the Republicans with Reuter’s polling just released today. Their “blue wave” hopes have seemingly vanished in the polling as the good economic and political news for President Donald Trump keeps pouring in. The activist left base of the Democrats are increasingly worried —or deluded— as they see a surprising resurgence of Republican chances to keep the House of Representatives in the November 2018 elections.

What does the Reuters poll show?

The Reuters poll has been showing some very favorable numbers for President Trump and Republicans for several weeks now, after they initially discounted their poll as a “blip” when they showed the approval ratings for Trump jumping nearly 20 points from their previous week.

220518poll.jpg


Democrats will need to have at least a 7 to 10 percent lead in the generic congressional ballot polling to be able to have a chance to pickup enough seats in the House to take over the chamber. With a Republican lead of 6 points, this is ten points in the wrong direction and the trend-lines are not favorable to Democrats as they screw up their golden opportunity to have their own 1994, 2010, 2014 scenario.

Come on fellas, have we not learned anything about how little value there is in these polls. The republicans holding both houses of congress after the mid terms would be almost as shocking as Trump winning the election. Repubs would be wise to prepare to deal with at least a split congress.
If the Dims take over the house, then the investigation into the crimes of the Obama administration will get swept under the rug. We can't allow that to happen.

Come on man. BO is gone. He will never be punished for Whatever crimes he may have committed. Just as nearly every POTUS before him, he has ridden off into the sunset. He can’t be president again, so whatever he did doesn’t matter. Whatever Hellary and Bill, or George and his dad did is history. Don’t spend your time on defeating someone not in the game.
The government is infested with moles that Obama put into the government. Many of them deserve to go to prison.
 
Why would someone vote Democrat at this point? That Party threw Citizens overboard years ago. It's a Party controlled by Communists/Globalists. A vote for a Democrat, is a vote against your own best interests.
 
Why would someone vote Democrat at this point? That Party threw Citizens overboard years ago. It's a Party controlled by Communists/Globalists. A vote for a Democrat, is a vote against your own best interests.

There are a lot of uneducated Americans.

I saw a bunch of people last night commenting on a Washington post article whining about Trump putting the DoJ in a “stranglehold”. And these people were complaining about the separation of powers because they didn’t know the DoJ is part of the executive branch and answers to the president.

They seriously don’t know this stuff and the media plays on this lack of information
 
RIght, says the kook dumbass with Trump's number made to look like a swastika.


Fascism is as fascism does. I could give you a laundry list but just the fact that he wants to destroy the free press as "fake" is enough.
He only wants to discredit the fake press, and he has done a pretty good job of it. Listening to snowflakes whine about freedom of the press couldn't be more hilarious.
The Right Stuff

"Language is an artifact, like a sword or a gun. Used skillfully, it has the power to...well, not so much to achieve things as to tear things down—including people...including the boys who came out on the strong side of that sheerly dividing line. Hey, that's what liberals are! Ideology? Economics? Social justice? Those are nothing but their prom outfits. Their politics were set for life in the schoolyard at age six. They were the weak, and forever after they resented the strong. That's why so many journalists are liberals! The very same schoolyard events that pushed them toward the written word...pushed them toward "liberalism."
Tom Wolfe, Back to Blood, p. 125


"The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible...a heretical thought ... should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words...by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever....Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought..."

This is why 98% of liberal typing involves semantic arguments. They believe controlling words is a way to control thoughts. Childish yes...but as you say liberalism is a form of stunted emotional growth with them stuck on the "thats not fair you big bully" segment of their playground years.
Big Brother Is Watching You Watch Him on TV

1984 is misleading, implying that only those specific extremes are totalitarian. That's why it was allowed to be published. Likewise, Machiavelli, who is lightweight and superficial and missed most of the tricks of princes.

Modern Newspeak: they with a singular antecedent, "Gates' net worth" instead of Gates's, "he or she," "clueless," "oxymoron," "Muslim" instead of Moslem, "Mumbai" for Bombay, "media, data, criteria, bacteria" as singular nouns. Most of all, "Grammar Nazi!!!" to cover up the fact that college graduates aren't smart enough to deserve their jobs.

“They with a singular antecedent “ is an example. “He” serves as the neuter personal singular pronoun in English. There is no other. Liberal writers mangle their sentences with the unnatural and clumsy “he/she” but that’s too unnatural to even pretend when speaking. So the ignorant use “they” when they self censor for political correctness.
It gets worse. “Chairman” does not mean a male piece of furniture or male anything any more than “human” or “woman” or even “mankind” indicate maleness. Yet we have to put up with the ridiculous “chairperson” now.
These liberals are not human. And soon enough they will notice the “son” in “chairperson” and we will witness the creation of “chair-organism of the board” or something equally ridiculous.
 
When the economy is growing solidly and steadily, as it is right now, this always helps the incumbent party.

In my area, there are "help wanted" signs just about everywhere you go. I'm also hearing a bunch of radio ads from recruiting firms telling businesses that they can find them the employees they need.

It's just very strange that liberals can't wrap their minds around the simple, time-tested truth that when you let people and businesses keep more of the money they earn, increased economic growth always follows. Similarly, when you make the regulatory burden on businesses lighter and less expensive, businesses have more money to hire people, to expand, to pay bonuses, etc., etc. Really, why can't liberals grasp this time-tested reality?
 
The article the OP put up is 2 weeks old. Democrats have taken back the lead since May 21st. Republicans had the lead for 4 days - May 17th - May 20th.
 
Fascism is as fascism does. I could give you a laundry list but just the fact that he wants to destroy the free press as "fake" is enough.
He only wants to discredit the fake press, and he has done a pretty good job of it. Listening to snowflakes whine about freedom of the press couldn't be more hilarious.
The Right Stuff

"Language is an artifact, like a sword or a gun. Used skillfully, it has the power to...well, not so much to achieve things as to tear things down—including people...including the boys who came out on the strong side of that sheerly dividing line. Hey, that's what liberals are! Ideology? Economics? Social justice? Those are nothing but their prom outfits. Their politics were set for life in the schoolyard at age six. They were the weak, and forever after they resented the strong. That's why so many journalists are liberals! The very same schoolyard events that pushed them toward the written word...pushed them toward "liberalism."
Tom Wolfe, Back to Blood, p. 125


"The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible...a heretical thought ... should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words...by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever....Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought..."

This is why 98% of liberal typing involves semantic arguments. They believe controlling words is a way to control thoughts. Childish yes...but as you say liberalism is a form of stunted emotional growth with them stuck on the "thats not fair you big bully" segment of their playground years.
Big Brother Is Watching You Watch Him on TV

1984 is misleading, implying that only those specific extremes are totalitarian. That's why it was allowed to be published. Likewise, Machiavelli, who is lightweight and superficial and missed most of the tricks of princes.

Modern Newspeak: they with a singular antecedent, "Gates' net worth" instead of Gates's, "he or she," "clueless," "oxymoron," "Muslim" instead of Moslem, "Mumbai" for Bombay, "media, data, criteria, bacteria" as singular nouns. Most of all, "Grammar Nazi!!!" to cover up the fact that college graduates aren't smart enough to deserve their jobs.

“They with a singular antecedent “ is an example. “He” serves as the neuter personal singular pronoun in English. There is no other. Liberal writers mangle their sentences with the unnatural and clumsy “he/she” but that’s too unnatural to even pretend when speaking. So the ignorant use “they” when they self censor for political correctness.
.
Whoever Corrupts Language Corrupts Thought (Newpeak: "If a Liberal Corrupts Language, They Corrupt Thought")

This irrational use is not just Liberal, it is copied by everybody. That, more than fiction would lead us to believe, is a true-life 1984 example of the spell these predatory imbeciles have over our entire population. How did such ignorant and confused speakers ever get so much power that they could change the speech of a whole nation? No one dares to identify them, which is why Liberals, Conservatives, and independents continue to copy their babble slavishly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top