BOMBSHELL: Six banks filed more than 170 suspicious activity reports on the Bidens, alleging money laundering, human trafficking, and tax fraud

A Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is required if potential money laundering or violations of the BSA are detected12. Other triggers to file a SAR include, but are not limited to345:
  • Transactions over a certain value
  • International money transfers over a certain value
  • Unusual transactions or account activity
  • Insider trading
  • Transactions linked to money laundering, terrorism financing or other crimes
I was looking for a link to this bullshit, Simp.

The IRS had access to all of these bank reports of funds received from overseas, and spent five years investigating them without finding a single crime.
 
WHOOSH over your head. Who the fuck has 170 SARs filed on their ass when they have 20 shell companies stood up that do nothing and sell no products? The lengths that dipshit Dem shills like you go to question the overwhelming obvious is hilarious. This is why your posts are mocked :itsok:
You realize that there are hundreds of thousands of SARS generated every year and they can be triggered by all sorts of NON illegal things

As noted above
 
I was looking for a link to this bullshit, Simp.

The IRS had access to all of these bank reports of funds received from overseas, and spent five years investigating them without finding a single crime.
That’s what I have been saying
 
To be efficacious, he would exclude all routine SARs that were created due to transaction sizes. Are there any actual suspicious transactions?
 
You realize that there are hundreds of thousands of SARS generated every year and they can be triggered by all sorts of NON illegal things

As noted above
Out of 330 million people, your Biden math seems faulty Dem sheeple. Lets say it's 500,000 SARs, that's .001 per person. Oh wait, Bidens had 170 of them. :auiqs.jpg:
 
WHOOSH over your head. Who the fuck has 170 SARs filed on their ass when they have 20 shell companies stood up that do nothing and sell no products? The lengths that dipshit Dem shills like you go to question the overwhelming obvious is hilarious. This is why your posts are mocked :itsok:
Any company. You are more dumb than a box of rocks.
 
B-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-buuuuut.....

NO EVIDENCE!!!!
Well, Present it to a Court.
I want to see the evidence.
And we're waiting for someone to point to what the *biden's were selling.
You appear to know, it's in your evidence, so why don't you know?
What was the money for?
What money?
If you have evidence of a crime, bring it to the court and prosecute ole Joe.
I'm all for it, of course, after he leaves office.
 
Most of these passed through one or more of the 20 shell companies the Bidens set up to allegedly launder money and evade taxes.

The upcoming impeachment hearings will undoubtedly reveal more.



Rep. Comer highlighted one specific SAR linked to a $3 million wire from China to Biden's business partner, Rob Walker. This money was received in an inactive account that had maintained a $50,000 balance for ten years before the significant wire transaction from China. Within just 24 hours of receiving the wire, Walker initiated incremental payments to several Biden shell companies, eventually disbursing funds to four different Biden family members.

Wait until the have access to the foreign banks. Hoo Doggies
 
You realize that there are hundreds of thousands of SARS generated every year and they can be triggered by all sorts of NON illegal things

As noted above
the "Nothing to see here, just move along" excuse wore out some time ago.

If the scam they tried pulling on the judge with Hunter's plea deal didn't expose that for you, perhaps nothing will.
 
Last edited:
It's good that Congress is taking their time building a very strong case against Biden, instead of throwing anything they can think of against the wall to see what sticks, like the DemoKKKrats did with Trump.

When the impeachment hearings begin, the evidence against Biden will be overwhelming, and the senate DemoKKKrats will be exposed for the criminals they are when they refuse to remove Cocaine Joe.

It's going to be epic.
IMHO, exposing the plea deal scam is the crack in the dam. Archer testifying on Monday will pry that crack wide open.
 
WE do, why don't you?
You obviously don't, otherwise....
1). You would have this evidence to show....like NOW.
2) You would have this in Court....like NOW

All you have, or claim to have, IS talking Points from the talking heads in RW News.
Trump is such a con man.
How did he dupe you? How did you allow it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top