Bombshell: Star Schiff witness Amb. Taylor admits NYT was his source

[Cellblock2429]

Time and again we see the phoniness of the democrats attempt to get an impeachment.

This is just another example.


Bombshell: Star Schiff Witness Amb. Taylor Admits NYT Was His Source

This whole narrative is a set up. The question was “what was the presidents goal for looking into the Biden’s?” Taylor was testifying to the agenda and inner workings of the state department where he worked. He said he never had direct contact with Trump. So who cares what he thought Trumps goal for going after Biden was? The guy that gave Taylor the intel about the holding of aid, trump donor and now ambassador Sondland, actually changed his testimony to acknowledge the agenda and the QPQ. So why are we dwelling on Taylor’s news source for the Biden agenda?

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

/—-/ So what happened to Adam Shytface’s solid evidence on Russian collusion?

 

[Nostra]

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

I'll tell you why Taylor trying to pass off NY Time's speculative reporting as inside damning information is important. Because it goes directly to credibility! The credibility of Schiff's entire managed campaign to get rid of Trump after his assurances about Russian collusion and Trump all turned out to be so much specious fart dust in the wind.
This is much more of the same.

Nice try, indeed. The "whistleblower" turns out to be a CIA plant at the White House as an Obama holdover.
And he immediately signaled his politicized intent by taking third hand information that supposedly would destroy Trump to the ringleader of this coup Adam Schiff, instead of to the Attorney General, as is the duty of actual whistleblowers.
A dead giveaway from the start.

This farce is all due to collapse for lack of substance just like the Russian hoax did but for ideologues like you there is too much giddiness and joy in the emotional investment you have put in Schiff's continuation of his campaign to drive Trump from office.to worry about that. I'll bet you are proud of your contribution to this national shame.

You just made that up... Taylor wasn’t trying to pass off anything. He actually gave direct answers to direct questions. Didn’t come off as politicizing anything. Did you actually read his testimony or are you going off the analysis you’ve read about it?

Clown did a 180 after reading in the NYTs the selective testimony Schifferbrains leaked to them.

 

[Slade3200]

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

I'll tell you why Taylor trying to pass off NY Time's speculative reporting as inside damning information is important. Because it goes directly to credibility! The credibility of Schiff's entire managed campaign to get rid of Trump after his assurances about Russian collusion and Trump all turned out to be so much specious fart dust in the wind.
This is much more of the same.

Nice try, indeed. The "whistleblower" turns out to be a CIA plant at the White House as an Obama holdover.
And he immediately signaled his politicized intent by taking third hand information that supposedly would destroy Trump to the ringleader of this coup Adam Schiff, instead of to the Attorney General, as is the duty of actual whistleblowers.
A dead giveaway from the start.

This farce is all due to collapse for lack of substance just like the Russian hoax did but for ideologues like you there is too much giddiness and joy in the emotional investment you have put in Schiff's continuation of his campaign to drive Trump from office.to worry about that. I'll bet you are proud of your contribution to this national shame.

You just made that up... Taylor wasn’t trying to pass off anything. He actually gave direct answers to direct questions. Didn’t come off as politicizing anything. Did you actually read his testimony or are you going off the analysis you’ve read about it?

Clown did a 180 after reading in the NYTs the selective testimony Schifferbrains leaked to them.

and why would he do that?

 

[Nostra]

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

I'll tell you why Taylor trying to pass off NY Time's speculative reporting as inside damning information is important. Because it goes directly to credibility! The credibility of Schiff's entire managed campaign to get rid of Trump after his assurances about Russian collusion and Trump all turned out to be so much specious fart dust in the wind.
This is much more of the same.

Nice try, indeed. The "whistleblower" turns out to be a CIA plant at the White House as an Obama holdover.
And he immediately signaled his politicized intent by taking third hand information that supposedly would destroy Trump to the ringleader of this coup Adam Schiff, instead of to the Attorney General, as is the duty of actual whistleblowers.
A dead giveaway from the start.

This farce is all due to collapse for lack of substance just like the Russian hoax did but for ideologues like you there is too much giddiness and joy in the emotional investment you have put in Schiff's continuation of his campaign to drive Trump from office.to worry about that. I'll bet you are proud of your contribution to this national shame.

You just made that up... Taylor wasn’t trying to pass off anything. He actually gave direct answers to direct questions. Didn’t come off as politicizing anything. Did you actually read his testimony or are you going off the analysis you’ve read about it?

Clown did a 180 after reading in the NYTs the selective testimony Schifferbrains leaked to them.

and why would he do that?

Apparently, Schifferbrains wasn't able to coordinate his testimony beforehand like the others.

 

[Slade3200]

Time and again we see the phoniness of the democrats attempt to get an impeachment.

This is just another example.


Bombshell: Star Schiff Witness Amb. Taylor Admits NYT Was His Source

This whole narrative is a set up. The question was “what was the presidents goal for looking into the Biden’s?” Taylor was testifying to the agenda and inner workings of the state department where he worked. He said he never had direct contact with Trump. So who cares what he thought Trumps goal for going after Biden was? The guy that gave Taylor the intel about the holding of aid, trump donor and now ambassador Sondland, actually changed his testimony to acknowledge the agenda and the QPQ. So why are we dwelling on Taylor’s news source for the Biden agenda?

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

/—-/ So what happened to Adam Shytface’s solid evidence on Russian collusion?

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

 

[Nostra]

Time and again we see the phoniness of the democrats attempt to get an impeachment.

This is just another example.


Bombshell: Star Schiff Witness Amb. Taylor Admits NYT Was His Source

This whole narrative is a set up. The question was “what was the presidents goal for looking into the Biden’s?” Taylor was testifying to the agenda and inner workings of the state department where he worked. He said he never had direct contact with Trump. So who cares what he thought Trumps goal for going after Biden was? The guy that gave Taylor the intel about the holding of aid, trump donor and now ambassador Sondland, actually changed his testimony to acknowledge the agenda and the QPQ. So why are we dwelling on Taylor’s news source for the Biden agenda?

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

/—-/ So what happened to Adam Shytface’s solid evidence on Russian collusion?

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

Complete lies.

He found no coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it.

Give up fella. That NOTHINGBURGER is stale.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Time and again we see the phoniness of the democrats attempt to get an impeachment.

This is just another example.


Bombshell: Star Schiff Witness Amb. Taylor Admits NYT Was His Source

This whole narrative is a set up. The question was “what was the presidents goal for looking into the Biden’s?” Taylor was testifying to the agenda and inner workings of the state department where he worked. He said he never had direct contact with Trump. So who cares what he thought Trumps goal for going after Biden was? The guy that gave Taylor the intel about the holding of aid, trump donor and now ambassador Sondland, actually changed his testimony to acknowledge the agenda and the QPQ. So why are we dwelling on Taylor’s news source for the Biden agenda?

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

/—-/ So what happened to Adam Shytface’s solid evidence on Russian collusion?

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

/——/ Shytface said it did, for 3 years. Guess he was wrong as usual.

 

[WEATHER53]

So the non first party information was not even heresay from 3rd to 2nd party but rather in the fake NYT
Just be more honest and say “I made it up”

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You just made that up... Taylor wasn’t trying to pass off anything. He actually gave direct answers to direct questions. Didn’t come off as politicizing anything. Did you actually read his testimony or are you going off the analysis you’ve read about it?

Did Taylor admit to using the Times as the source for his claim about Rudy Giuliani and Ukraine or not?
He gave a direct answer, yes. Unfortunately that answer was based entirely on what the super leftist NY Times wrote
about the Ukraine circus and not on Taylor's personal knowledge which makes moot anything
he testified on.

Class dismissed now, troll. Go on home and spank yourself.

 

[otto105]

Time and again we see the phoniness of the democrats attempt to get an impeachment.

This is just another example.


Bombshell: Star Schiff Witness Amb. Taylor Admits NYT Was His Source

Thanks for the props to the New York Times for good reporting on Rudy.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

Keep on fighting the bad finished fight.
See if you can find any real practical distinction between collusion and conspiracy. I'll bet you can't. You are just flailing away in the middle of an ocean of ignorance.

 

[Slade3200]

Time and again we see the phoniness of the democrats attempt to get an impeachment.

This is just another example.


Bombshell: Star Schiff Witness Amb. Taylor Admits NYT Was His Source

This whole narrative is a set up. The question was “what was the presidents goal for looking into the Biden’s?” Taylor was testifying to the agenda and inner workings of the state department where he worked. He said he never had direct contact with Trump. So who cares what he thought Trumps goal for going after Biden was? The guy that gave Taylor the intel about the holding of aid, trump donor and now ambassador Sondland, actually changed his testimony to acknowledge the agenda and the QPQ. So why are we dwelling on Taylor’s news source for the Biden agenda?

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

/—-/ So what happened to Adam Shytface’s solid evidence on Russian collusion?

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

Complete lies.

He found no coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it.

Give up fella. That NOTHINGBURGER is stale.

No shit Sherlock, coordination means conspiracy. Secret meetings is collusion. Collusion can be legal or illegal. Trump and his crew colluded , mueller determined it did rise to the level of criminal conspiracy. I haven’t told one lie

 

[Slade3200]

You just made that up... Taylor wasn’t trying to pass off anything. He actually gave direct answers to direct questions. Didn’t come off as politicizing anything. Did you actually read his testimony or are you going off the analysis you’ve read about it?

Did Taylor admit to using the Times as the source for his claim about Rudy Giuliani and Ukraine or not?
He gave a direct answer, yes. Unfortunately that answer was based entirely on what the super leftist NY Times wrote
about the Ukraine circus and not on Taylor's personal knowledge which makes moot anything
he testified on.

Class dismissed now, troll. Go on home and spank yourself.

what exactly was his claim that was backed up by the Times. Let’s see this whopper of a accusation you think he made

 

[Nostra]

Time and again we see the phoniness of the democrats attempt to get an impeachment.

This is just another example.


Bombshell: Star Schiff Witness Amb. Taylor Admits NYT Was His Source

This whole narrative is a set up. The question was “what was the presidents goal for looking into the Biden’s?” Taylor was testifying to the agenda and inner workings of the state department where he worked. He said he never had direct contact with Trump. So who cares what he thought Trumps goal for going after Biden was? The guy that gave Taylor the intel about the holding of aid, trump donor and now ambassador Sondland, actually changed his testimony to acknowledge the agenda and the QPQ. So why are we dwelling on Taylor’s news source for the Biden agenda?

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

/—-/ So what happened to Adam Shytface’s solid evidence on Russian collusion?

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

Complete lies.

He found no coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it.

Give up fella. That NOTHINGBURGER is stale.

No shit Sherlock, coordination means conspiracy. Secret meetings is collusion. Collusion can be legal or illegal. Trump and his crew colluded , mueller determined it did rise to the level of criminal conspiracy. I haven’t told one lie

"Coordination means conspiracy"? Agreed.

So "no coordination means no conspiracy". Let's see you try to spin your way out of that ditch.

 

[Slade3200]

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

Keep on fighting the bad finished fight.
See if you can find any real practical distinction between collusion and conspiracy. I'll bet you can't. You are just flailing away in the middle of an ocean of ignorance.

Collusion is a secret/shady meeting. Conspiracy is coordinating in illegal activity. It isn’t hard, get a dictionary

 

[Polishprince]

So, we are going to impeach of the testimony of a clown who was told what to say by the NYTs.

Man, the Dimwingers aren't just stepping in the shit, they are rolling around in it.

Its the best case the left can make for impeachment , even after working and investigating since election day 2016. Trump hadn't even been inaugurated, and the libs were looking to remove him.

Trump is without a doubt, the Most Ethical President Almighty God Ever Created. No one else could have stood up and thrived under this scrutiny.

After he is reelected, that will be the end of the D's.

 

[otto105]

So, we are going to impeach of the testimony of a clown who was told what to say by the NYTs.

Man, the Dimwingers aren't just stepping in the shit, they are rolling around in it.

Its the best case the left can make for impeachment , even after working and investigating since election day 2016. Trump hadn't even been inaugurated, and the libs were looking to remove him.

Trump is without a doubt, the Most Ethical President Almighty God Ever Created. No one else could have stood up and thrived under this scrutiny.

After he is reelected, that will be the end of the D's.

How long is the yellow bus that you ride to the zoo?

 

[Slade3200]

This whole narrative is a set up. The question was “what was the presidents goal for looking into the Biden’s?” Taylor was testifying to the agenda and inner workings of the state department where he worked. He said he never had direct contact with Trump. So who cares what he thought Trumps goal for going after Biden was? The guy that gave Taylor the intel about the holding of aid, trump donor and now ambassador Sondland, actually changed his testimony to acknowledge the agenda and the QPQ. So why are we dwelling on Taylor’s news source for the Biden agenda?

You all are grabbing at straws trying to change the narrative. Taylor’s opinion about what Trumps goal was isn’t important. His account of what correspondence and directives flowed through the state department is. Nice try.

/—-/ So what happened to Adam Shytface’s solid evidence on Russian collusion?

It was all laid out in the mueller report smart guy. Mueller didn’t think it rose to conspiracy but it was def collusion.

Complete lies.

He found no coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it.

Give up fella. That NOTHINGBURGER is stale.

No shit Sherlock, coordination means conspiracy. Secret meetings is collusion. Collusion can be legal or illegal. Trump and his crew colluded , mueller determined it did rise to the level of criminal conspiracy. I haven’t told one lie

"Coordination means conspiracy"? Agreed.

So "no coordination means no conspiracy". Let's see you try to spin your way out of that ditch.

illegal coordination is conspiracy. Meeting in secret is collusion. If there always illegal coordination during the collusion then its illegal. How do you not understand this?

 

[Nostra]

So, we are going to impeach of the testimony of a clown who was told what to say by the NYTs.

Man, the Dimwingers aren't just stepping in the shit, they are rolling around in it.

Its the best case the left can make for impeachment , even after working and investigating since election day 2016. Trump hadn't even been inaugurated, and the libs were looking to remove him.

Trump is without a doubt, the Most Ethical President Almighty God Ever Created. No one else could have stood up and thrived under this scrutiny.

After he is reelected, that will be the end of the D's.

How long is the yellow bus that you ride to the zoo?

I'm guessing about 30' longer than yours.

 

[WEATHER53]

If the “it’s all laid out in the Mueller report for all to see” had Any truth to it then Mueller would have pounced.