Ask some people what they would do about ISIS, "Whatever Obama is doing, we're against that." Never an actual plan. Just a cowardly running away while throwing spitballs at what someone else is trying to do.
So let's strike while the Parisian iron is hot.
Should we send in the necessary ground troops to finish off ISIS, or not?
It is currently estimated it would take about 30,000 to 40,000 troops to do so.
Let's assume for the sake of argument no other country is going to send troops. It's obvious they are not going to. Maybe once we sent troops, they would join, but we cannot assume that.
So, no wiggling, no waffling bullshit about how Obama would never send troops. The question is, "SHOULD we?"
I voted No. But only as long as Obozo is in office!