Border chief says Wall is a waste of money .

[danielpalos]

my left wing "crystal ball" predicts plenty of litigation, for fun and profit.

So you're going to sue because we want to uphold laws already in the books?

What laws are on the books?

Are ya fucken stupid?

not as dumb as You. States have no authority over immigration, since 1808.

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. Protect us with immigration laws? What if they don't want to assimilate, but would like to go home and come back, on a regular basis?

Let's ask all the electricians, plumbers, carpenters , brick layers, etc... whose lives have been destroyed by your "generosity".

nope; the right wing gets the credit for that. i am advocating for unemployment compensation that is one dollar an hour less than the statutory minimum wage or beat our poverty guidelines, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Wrong, douche bag. Democrats who facilitate illegal aliens are the ones who get the credit. Don't try to put the blame on Republicans.

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage will help solve our problems, along with unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed; only the right wing, has a problem with it.

I get it.
You get an advanced degree, have a career, buy a house, etc..., lose your career due to trespassers and unnecessary cheap labor called business visas and then be happy getting $15.00/hour and lose everything you spent years working towards.

What's your IQ?

higher than yours.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Socialism has equal protection of the law the regarding the concept of employment, at the will of either party, in our at-will employment States.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So you're going to sue because we want to uphold laws already in the books?

What laws are on the books?

Are ya fucken stupid?

not as dumb as You. States have no authority over immigration, since 1808.

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

 

[leftwinger]

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage will help solve our problems, along with unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed; only the right wing, has a problem with it.

Last time I ask you..................OK assume $15/hr min for anyone willing to work. will this be taxed? State/FED?

You other posts have stated "$1hr less" for anyone who does not want to work. will this be taxed? State/FED?

There are ~100 million not working right now. If you pay them $14/hr.......do the math.

$14*40=$560/wk
$560*52=$29,120/year
$29,120*100million = $2.912T (where does this come from?)

How do you stop all the $15/hr folks from saying "Why work? I can get 90% to watch TV"

Even if it is 50million...........on your new Unemployment scheme it is >$1T/year.

Does this replace Welfare? Food Stamps? Section 8? Medicaid? EIC? on and on and on.........

 

[bripat9643]

Let's ask all the electricians, plumbers, carpenters , brick layers, etc... whose lives have been destroyed by your "generosity".

nope; the right wing gets the credit for that. i am advocating for unemployment compensation that is one dollar an hour less than the statutory minimum wage or beat our poverty guidelines, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Wrong, douche bag. Democrats who facilitate illegal aliens are the ones who get the credit. Don't try to put the blame on Republicans.

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage will help solve our problems, along with unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed; only the right wing, has a problem with it.

I get it.
You get an advanced degree, have a career, buy a house, etc..., lose your career due to trespassers and unnecessary cheap labor called business visas and then be happy getting $15.00/hour and lose everything you spent years working towards.

What's your IQ?

higher than yours.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Socialism has equal protection of the law the regarding the concept of employment, at the will of either party, in our at-will employment States.

Are you talking about socialism or capitalism?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The retiring border chief is an Obama appointee.

That said, I agree with more border agents, sharpshootin' guys who can hit a refried bean at 1000 yards.

right wing fantasy?

Simple efficiency.

there is no efficiency in Prohibition.

Ummmm ... ri-iiiiight.

Yup; and, you cede the point since you have nothing but fallacy for a rebuttal

Why fallacy? Be specific.

 

[Indeependent]

There is no prohibition in our immigration laws that aren't there to protect Americans.

lol. Protect us with immigration laws? What if they don't want to assimilate, but would like to go home and come back, on a regular basis?

Let's ask all the electricians, plumbers, carpenters , brick layers, etc... whose lives have been destroyed by your "generosity".

nope; the right wing gets the credit for that. i am advocating for unemployment compensation that is one dollar an hour less than the statutory minimum wage or beat our poverty guidelines, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Wrong, douche bag. Democrats who facilitate illegal aliens are the ones who get the credit. Don't try to put the blame on Republicans.

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage will help solve our problems, along with unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed; only the right wing, has a problem with it.

I get it.
You get an advanced degree, have a career, buy a house, etc..., lose your career due to trespassers and unnecessary cheap labor called business visas and then be happy getting $15.00/hour and lose everything you spent years working towards.

What's your IQ

Let's ask all the electricians, plumbers, carpenters , brick layers, etc... whose lives have been destroyed by your "generosity".

nope; the right wing gets the credit for that. i am advocating for unemployment compensation that is one dollar an hour less than the statutory minimum wage or beat our poverty guidelines, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Wrong, douche bag. Democrats who facilitate illegal aliens are the ones who get the credit. Don't try to put the blame on Republicans.

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage will help solve our problems, along with unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed; only the right wing, has a problem with it.

I get it.
You get an advanced degree, have a career, buy a house, etc..., lose your career due to trespassers and unnecessary cheap labor called business visas and then be happy getting $15.00/hour and lose everything you spent years working towards.

What's your IQ?

higher than yours.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.

Socialism has equal protection of the law the regarding the concept of employment, at the will of either party, in our at-will employment States.

Capitalism and having a Representative Democracy are SUPPOSED to prevent what has been going on since Reagan.
I voted for someone who would actually represent me.
So much for your superior IQ.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Walls work 24/7, just ask Israel.

It's not ideal and noone wishes it were needed, but it would be money well spent. $10B or so is nothing compared to the current costs.

If the U.S had 11,000 illegals instead of 11 million, you might not consider a wall. Now however, it is clear that it is vital to protect the U.S/Mexican border.

 

[danielpalos]

What laws are on the books?

Are ya fucken stupid?

not as dumb as You. States have no authority over immigration, since 1808.

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

 

[ding]

Are ya fucken stupid?

not as dumb as You. States have no authority over immigration, since 1808.

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

 

[danielpalos]

not as dumb as You. States have no authority over immigration, since 1808.

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.

 

[ding]

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.

Ok, now back to those stoners, wtf do they do for a living anyway?

 

[danielpalos]

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.

Ok, now back to those stoners, wtf do they do for a living anyway?

irrelevant; unless you want to care about what the rich do for living, while also not paying personal income taxes.

 

[ding]

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.

Ok, now back to those stoners, wtf do they do for a living anyway?

irrelevant; unless you want to care about what the rich do for living, while also not paying personal income taxes.

Yes, I want to hear about that. Please do tell me about that.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Are ya fucken stupid?

not as dumb as You. States have no authority over immigration, since 1808.

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

Yeah....and more people will move out of Cali shrinking your tax base further,but I'm sure you can make up the difference taxing min wage illegals.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.

So you're alright with Californication breaking federal law by encouraging and harboring illegals?

 

[danielpalos]

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.

Ok, now back to those stoners, wtf do they do for a living anyway?

irrelevant; unless you want to care about what the rich do for living, while also not paying personal income taxes.

Yes, I want to hear about that. Please do tell me about that.

just hearsay and soothsay?

 

[danielpalos]

not as dumb as You. States have no authority over immigration, since 1808.

Harboring criminals is against the law.

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

Yeah....and more people will move out of Cali shrinking your tax base further,but I'm sure you can make up the difference taxing min wage illegals.

not if we can lower taxes for the private sector, with tax revenue increases.

 

[danielpalos]

it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....

lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.

not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.

So you're alright with Californication breaking federal law by encouraging and harboring illegals?

There is no law to break. States specifically, ceded their former sovereign, States' right over immigration into the Union, in 1808.

 

[theHawk]

He's retiring and no longer has to play politics .

He's right . If you really want to control illegal immigration the money is better spent on more Ice agents or more immigration courts and judges .


Retiring Border Chief Calls Trump's Wall a Waste of Time, Money

How about all of the above: a big wall, more agents, more convictions and imprisonment of caught illegals, nix liberal judges that let them walk.