Border chief says Wall is a waste of money .

Harboring criminals is against the law.
it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....
lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

Yeah....and more people will move out of Cali shrinking your tax base further,but I'm sure you can make up the difference taxing min wage illegals.
not if we can lower taxes for the private sector, with tax revenue increases.

So you're for lowering taxes? Thats a liberal first.
 
So they won't know what is going on and won't care about it when they find out. Good plan.
not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.
Ok, now back to those stoners, wtf do they do for a living anyway?
irrelevant; unless you want to care about what the rich do for living, while also not paying personal income taxes.
Yes, I want to hear about that. Please do tell me about that.
just hearsay and soothsay?
That's what I thought, lol.
 
He's retiring and no longer has to play politics .

He's right . If you really want to control illegal immigration the money is better spent on more Ice agents or more immigration courts and judges .


Retiring Border Chief Calls Trump's Wall a Waste of Time, Money

How about all of the above: a big wall, more agents, more convictions and imprisonment of caught illegals, nix liberal judges that let them walk.

Well that's cheap!

We have walls n fenses where we need them . Putting a wall in nowheresville is the waste .
 
He's retiring and no longer has to play politics .

He's right . If you really want to control illegal immigration the money is better spent on more Ice agents or more immigration courts and judges .


Retiring Border Chief Calls Trump's Wall a Waste of Time, Money

How about all of the above: a big wall, more agents, more convictions and imprisonment of caught illegals, nix liberal judges that let them walk.

Well that's cheap!

We have walls n fenses where we need them . Putting a wall in nowheresville is the waste .
No it's not, because plenty of illegals cross the border in nowheresville. And when walls go up everywhere else, then they will concentrate on crossing in nowheresville. What you're saying is that you shouldn't put a wall all the way around your property because there's nothing valuable in some parts of your property. That's the kind of stupidity leftwingers are famous for.
 
it is Only a federal crime.

10USC311 is also, federal law.

We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....
lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

Yeah....and more people will move out of Cali shrinking your tax base further,but I'm sure you can make up the difference taxing min wage illegals.
not if we can lower taxes for the private sector, with tax revenue increases.

So you're for lowering taxes? Thats a liberal first.
merely our new "mantra" of simply using capitalism for all of its worth.
 
not our problem; it is a federal problem that should be solved at the federal borders with the federal powers already delegated in our federal Constitution. it should not be inconveniencing, the People in the several, United States.
Ok, now back to those stoners, wtf do they do for a living anyway?
irrelevant; unless you want to care about what the rich do for living, while also not paying personal income taxes.
Yes, I want to hear about that. Please do tell me about that.
just hearsay and soothsay?
That's what I thought, lol.
that is all you have.
 
Ok, now back to those stoners, wtf do they do for a living anyway?
irrelevant; unless you want to care about what the rich do for living, while also not paying personal income taxes.
Yes, I want to hear about that. Please do tell me about that.
just hearsay and soothsay?
That's what I thought, lol.
that is all you have.
I have quite a lot actually. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
 
We'll see how sanctuary cities do when they receive no federal dollars....
lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

Yeah....and more people will move out of Cali shrinking your tax base further,but I'm sure you can make up the difference taxing min wage illegals.
not if we can lower taxes for the private sector, with tax revenue increases.

So you're for lowering taxes? Thats a liberal first.
merely our new "mantra" of simply using capitalism for all of its worth.

Yeah right...
Like Commifornia is going to reduce taxes.:lmao:
 
irrelevant; unless you want to care about what the rich do for living, while also not paying personal income taxes.
Yes, I want to hear about that. Please do tell me about that.
just hearsay and soothsay?
That's what I thought, lol.
that is all you have.
I have quite a lot actually. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
sounds more like plagiarism.
 
lol. we legalized pot in California; special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

local governments can implement their own taxes.

Yeah....and more people will move out of Cali shrinking your tax base further,but I'm sure you can make up the difference taxing min wage illegals.
not if we can lower taxes for the private sector, with tax revenue increases.

So you're for lowering taxes? Thats a liberal first.
merely our new "mantra" of simply using capitalism for all of its worth.

Yeah right...
Like Commifornia is going to reduce taxes.:lmao:
we legalized pot. special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.
 
Yeah....and more people will move out of Cali shrinking your tax base further,but I'm sure you can make up the difference taxing min wage illegals.
not if we can lower taxes for the private sector, with tax revenue increases.

So you're for lowering taxes? Thats a liberal first.
merely our new "mantra" of simply using capitalism for all of its worth.

Yeah right...
Like Commifornia is going to reduce taxes.:lmao:
we legalized pot. special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

Stop repeating yourself,it's a sign of low intelligence.
 
Yes, I want to hear about that. Please do tell me about that.
just hearsay and soothsay?
That's what I thought, lol.
that is all you have.
I have quite a lot actually. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
sounds more like plagiarism.
Sounds like experience and reason to me. There is no formal socialism of socialism. Just vague, no fault, rosy notions of goodness that will instantly make their wildest dreams of a socialist utopia come true. When pressed on the virtues of socialism, no cognitive argument has yet to be made. Because they can't. There are none to be made. So it's adherents are left to defend it without actually acknowledging they are defending it. That's why when they are confronted with a thorough examination of socialism, they are left to make statements such as the one you just made, "sounds more like plagiarism." A truly ballsy response considering that it is akin to whipping ot your tally whacker at a gun fight. While it may be amusing, it won't be very effective.
 
not if we can lower taxes for the private sector, with tax revenue increases.

So you're for lowering taxes? Thats a liberal first.
merely our new "mantra" of simply using capitalism for all of its worth.

Yeah right...
Like Commifornia is going to reduce taxes.:lmao:
we legalized pot. special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

Stop repeating yourself,it's a sign of low intelligence.
we can afford to reduce income taxes.
 
just hearsay and soothsay?
That's what I thought, lol.
that is all you have.
I have quite a lot actually. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.
sounds more like plagiarism.
Sounds like experience and reason to me. There is no formal socialism of socialism. Just vague, no fault, rosy notions of goodness that will instantly make their wildest dreams of a socialist utopia come true. When pressed on the virtues of socialism, no cognitive argument has yet to be made. Because they can't. There are none to be made. So it's adherents are left to defend it without actually acknowledging they are defending it. That's why when they are confronted with a thorough examination of socialism, they are left to make statements such as the one you just made, "sounds more like plagiarism." A truly ballsy response considering that it is akin to whipping ot your tally whacker at a gun fight. While it may be amusing, it won't be very effective.
Socialism starts with a social Contract like a Constitution.
 
He's retiring and no longer has to play politics .

He's right . If you really want to control illegal immigration the money is better spent on more Ice agents or more immigration courts and judges .


Retiring Border Chief Calls Trump's Wall a Waste of Time, Money

You're talking rubbish, the wall is amazingly useful.

Why?

The wall is a representation of Trump's ego. By having a wall everyone will be able to see how big Trump's ego is and he'll then stop crying from the press harassing him, because it's really not okay to criticize people like Trump. It's not his fault he became president, he was born like it, unlike Mexicans who made the choice.
 
So you're for lowering taxes? Thats a liberal first.
merely our new "mantra" of simply using capitalism for all of its worth.

Yeah right...
Like Commifornia is going to reduce taxes.:lmao:
we legalized pot. special interests get almost ten dollars an ounce, off the top.

Stop repeating yourself,it's a sign of low intelligence.
we can afford to reduce income taxes.

Liberals never lower taxes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top