Breaking: "Dropping an atomic bomb on Gaza is one of Israel’s options."

We'd do the same. We probably will at some point
1699232011357.png
 
Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu suggested that dropping an atomic bomb on Gaza is one of Israel’s options.

He further explained that his intention is to emphasize the need for a forceful and disproportional response to "terror".

This incident underscores the complexity and volatility of the situation in Gaza (about 300 Zionist soldiers were killed or injured in just 3 days), and the urgent need for diplomatic solutions to bring about a peaceful resolution.

View attachment 853469


Dropping one Iran is another option.
 
Perhaps the weapons developers in Israel have developed a low power tactical nuke suitcase bomb Or perhaps a nuclear penetrator bomb to take out tunnels and bunkers.

If Israel is hated now, imagine the hatred if they used such a weapon.
Designer boutique nukes!!!
 
The use of nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a horrendous war crime, and the guilty should have been executed.
Israel not only has no such option, but the radiation fallout would kill everyone in Jerusalem eventually.
Yes the use of nukes by idrael would be idiotic.

Our use of those bombs was no war crime, it was justiifiable.
 
Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu suggested that dropping an atomic bomb on Gaza is one of Israel’s options.

He further explained that his intention is to emphasize the need for a forceful and disproportional response to "terror".

This incident underscores the complexity and volatility of the situation in Gaza (about 300 Zionist soldiers were killed or injured in just 3 days), and the urgent need for diplomatic solutions to bring about a peaceful resolution.

View attachment 853469


Have they finally stopped denying they have them?
 
~~~~~~
Deep penetrator bombs can certain play havoc with those tunnels.


The Gaza strip is 25 miles long by 5-7 miles wide. Even tactical nukes are to great for application in an area so small.
The use of tactical nukes is not advisable.

Yet Iran would have no problem launching nukes on Israel even if it means wiping out Palestinians, Jordanians. Lebanese, Syrians and Egyptians.

Not true regarding application. Followed by a true statement regarding it is not advisable.
 
The use of nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a horrendous war crime, and the guilty should have been executed.
Israel not only has no such option, but the radiation fallout would kill everyone in Jerusalem eventually.

Not likely in any way.

Fallout goes where the winds blow. Winds in Israel tend from the Mediterranean eastward. Fallout from an attack on Gaza would land in the Israeli Sinai in all probability.
 
The correct way is a disportionate response that puts the fear of Allah and Yahweh into any surviving Hamas.
Wait a second. I thought you were a liberal Guy. What the . Do you support Israel …. Your support those aliens like that minister pictured in the original post…..that ugly beast
 
Wait a second. I thought you were a liberal Guy. What the . Do you support Israel …. Your support those aliens like that minister pictured in the original post…..that ugly beast

Amazing you don’t see the damage the Dems have done to they’re brand in the last 3 years.
 
It's a war, I am sure there are many options on the table. In reality, Israel dropping a nuke will not happen, they would become pariahs the world over.


I also believe that Hamas underestimated Israel's response to their terrorist attack. They didn't expect a real war...
The fact that it's out here in a discussion also points to the possibility of a false flag operation by someone being in the works.
 

Forum List

Back
Top