Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,452
- 82,395
- 2,635
My best guess is being yuge Impeached Trump fanatics, they obeyed his message of countering protesters with firearms. They were clearly not threatened as they feigned. One of them even admitted he pulled his gun out before they were threatened. And no sane person is going to approach a crowd of hundreds with a non-functioning gun if they're truly in fear for their life.Those threats came after the McCloskey's already threatened their lives with guns.They were threatening too.. to kill them, kill their animalsAgain ... tney weren't on tne McCloskey's property.That same crowd walked past many houses. They didn't touch one. The McCloskey's were not threatened by them. They had no legal right to assault that crowd.None since trespassing is a class B misdemeanor in Missouri, not a felony. Are you always this melodramatic?Easy.They are charged with a felony so the government can confiscate their firearms.
She has to prove first that they break the law.
Care to explain what law did they break?
565.056 said:565.056 said:1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: (3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;
Uhm-um...
Sooooo. how many "protesters" were charged with felony for breaking into private property and apprehended the property owners with their presence?
Oh, now they were "trespassing". I mean, there is a screaming mob, beating drums, breaking into property, and there is no reason to worry at all?
Why would McCloskeys even feel threatened to pull the guns out? No reason at all.
Yet somehow in your head, breaking into property is not a threat, but reaction to break in is.
This is part where you try to convince me that people who break into someone property have good intentions. Maybe they just wanted to fix the plumbing, paint some art on the outside, and peacefully mow the lawn.
Can you tell us, in your "expert opinion", why would McCloskey threaten anyone?