Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,452
- 82,395
- 2,635
LOLOL"They were facing an angry mob on their property."Again ... tney weren't on tne McCloskey's property.
Liar!!!!!!
You are like all Moon Bats. You are uneducated and low information.
Here are the facts:
They were facing an angry mob on their property. And this was in the context of an extended period of violence and arson in the surrounding neighborhoods. Media reports of them "taking it to the suburbs" were as credible as anything the press has reported lately. The police had advised them they would not be responding. Some of the protesters were taunting them with death threats giving more of an appearance of a lynch mob than a weekly Bible study group. A metal gate had been smashed to gain entry to the property. They were entirely reasonable in their actions. If anything, they were a bit reserved about it. You can't say they had planned or laid a trap seeing as how they didn't even have shoes on during the incident.
So go fuck yourself Moon Bat.
Wrong. The crowd was not on their property.
And the husband had his gun drawn before he was threatened. It's all on video, including the video of the husband admitting he brandished his firearm before any threats were made.
The goons broke down a gate to a gated community. They had every right to brandish weapons to protect life and property.
That's the law, Moonbat
Watch the video, ya loon. The gun is out before the gate is "broke down."