https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download

Sorry, it's longer than a tweet. I know this means most of you won't read it and will parrot what you are told to parrot about it.

For those with intellects whose bandwidths are bigger than a bumper sticker, it's a fascinating read. It goes into great detail about Roger Stone's communications with Assange through intermediaries. There are emails and texts which make it very clear that Stone was indeed communicating with Assange, just as he bragged he was doing all during the late stages of the 2016 campaign.

Cast of Characters:

"Person 1" is Jerome Corsi.

"Person 2" is Randy Credico (Randy Credico - Wikipedia)

"Organization 1" is Wikileaks.

"High-ranking Trump Campaign Official" is Steve Bannon.


Randy Credico was Stone's intermediary to Assange.


Paragraph 15.e.:

On or about September 30, 2016, Person 2 sent STONE via text message a photograph of Person 2 standing outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where the head of Organization 1 was located.
 
You mean like Manafort
Wut?? You think we’re angry Stone was indicted???

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif

This nothingburger indictment stunt just backfired.
Oh?

Nothing will happen to him.

Either he flips and tells Mueller how trump directed the entire conspiracy...or he goes to jail...Pretty simple really.

Too late for a Pardon...and even if there was one....his right to plead the 5th Amendment...will be gone.
Even worse for Stone, the indictment states a “senior Trump campaign official” was directed to contact Stone about the hacked emails. The list of names of those who could direct a “senior Trump campaign official” is very short. Extremely short.

Stone is being defiant for the moment and will likely not reveal who was directed to contact him, of more importantly, who directed the “senior Trump campaign official.”

To break his defiance, I imagine Mueller is going to throw the proverbial book at him to persuade him to name names. Stone is looking at a very long prison sentence unless he gives up that name.
 
Why would he do that when he was in direct contact with the Russian hacker?
image.jpg



Actually Cooked Hillary was the one to have "direct contact" with Russian agents. Which makes a good conversation on who's to blame for framing Roger Stone. Your mindless jargon is pointing out the Clinton's behind all of this framing.
LOL

That’s not a “Russian agent,” it’s Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister. What crime does your conservative brain claim he committed?
She's obviously colluding with the Russians.
Colluding what? What crime did Lavrov commit?

I can’t help but notice you brain-dead cons can’t do anything more than babble incoherently.
You turds claim collusion with Russians is a crime. That's what Hillary is doing, dumbass.
No one is claiming collusion is a crime. It’s been said over and over there is no such crime as collusion.
 
Or it could be a Paul Manafort, as the high ranking official.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download

Sorry, it's longer than a tweet. I know this means most of you won't read it and will parrot what you are told to parrot about it.

For those with intellects whose bandwidths are bigger than a bumper sticker, it's a fascinating read. It goes into great detail about Roger Stone's communications with Assange through intermediaries. There are emails and texts which make it very clear that Stone was indeed communicating with Assange, just as he bragged he was doing all during the late stages of the 2016 campaign.

Cast of Characters:

"Person 1" is Jerome Corsi.

"Person 2" is Randy Credico (Randy Credico - Wikipedia)

"Organization 1" is Wikileaks.

"High-ranking Trump Campaign Official" is Steve Bannon.


Randy Credico was Stone's intermediary to Assange.


Paragraph 15.e.:

On or about September 30, 2016, Person 2 sent STONE via text message a photograph of Person 2 standing outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where the head of Organization 1 was located.
 
The MSM needed a big distraction from their Native - MAGA hat debacle. Mueller cane through for them to provide them some theatrics, as if Stone would not had turned himself in? He was expecting these bogus charges.
 
[QOTE="Faun, post: 21685884, member: 33829"]
image.jpg



Actually Cooked Hillary was the one to have "direct contact" with Russian agents. Which makes a good conversation on who's to blame for framing Roger Stone. Your mindless jargon is pointing out the Clinton's behind all of this framing.
LOL

That’s not a “Russian agent,” it’s Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister. What crime does your conservative brain claim he committed?
She's obviously colluding with the Russians.
Colluding what? What crime did Lavrov commit?

I can’t help but notice you brain-dead cons can’t do anything more than babble incoherently.
You turds claim collusion with Russians is a crime. That's what Hillary is doing, dumbass.
No one is claiming collusion is a crime. It’s been said over and over there is no such crime as collusion.[/QUOTE]

Your redundancy is getting older.
2QLh7Ex
 
LOLOL

And by “this kind of shit,” you mean indicting people for lying to federal investigators and obstructing justice.

The evidence for that is nonexistent. Mueller told numerous lie in the indictment, like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC. There isn't a shred of evidence for that.

In the case of Popodopolous it meant not remembering something he said weeks earlier.

Mueller is a thug. Finding evidence of collusion is not what he's doing. His only agenda is getting the President by any means possible. When he's under Barr's thumb, his reign of terror will be over.
”like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC.”

LOLOLOL

The indictment states no such thing, ya fucking moron. It says Assange released emails “stolen by others.”

2s0blvo.jpg


Do you ever post anything that isn’t fucking moronic?

Ever???
That's also a lie.
Oh, fucking moron? You have evidence our intelligence community is wrong about Russians hacking the DNC email?

Let’s see it......
You're asking us to trust the Intelligence community run by Brennan, Comey and Clapper?

Really?
LOLOL

You’re asking us to trust you.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif
 
brothers and sisters, the claim of Russian collusion is a politically motivated fairy tale!

It literally says in the Stone indictment that there was no Russian collusion. If there was then why was he charged with trying to get ahold of the emails.

Which is what everyone was trying to do.
Maybe the Russian translation says that but in ENGLISH it talks about collusion with Trump officials...Between Stone Banon and someone above him
 
COUNT ONE (Obstruction of Proceeding)
From in or around May 2017 through at least December 2017, within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendant ROGER JASON STONE, JR., corruptly influenced, obstructed, impeded, and endeavored to influence, obstruct, and impede the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry and investigation is being had by either House, and any committee of either House and any joint committee of the Congress, to wit: STONE testified falsely and misleadingly at a HPSCI hearing in or around September 2017; STONE failed to turn over and lied about the existence of responsive records to HPSCI’s requests about documents; STONE submitted and caused to be submitted a letter to HPSCI falsely and misleadingly describing communications with Person 2; and STONE attempted to have Person 2 testify falsely before HPSCI or prevent him from testifying.

COUNTS TWO THROUGH SIX (False Statements)
2: STONE testified falsely that he did not have emails with third parties about the head of Organization 1, and that he did not have any documents, emails, or text messages that refer to the head of Organization 1.

3: STONE testified falsely that his August 2016 references to being in contact with the head of Organization 1 were references to communications with a single “go-between,” “mutual friend,” and “intermediary,” who STONE identified as Person 2.

4: STONE testified falsely that he did not ask the person he referred to as his “go-between,” “mutual friend,” and “intermediary,” to communicate anything to the head of Organization 1 and did not ask the intermediary to do anything on STONE’s behalf.

5: STONE testified falsely that he and the person he referred to as his “go-between,” “mutual friend,” and “intermediary” did not communicate via text message or email about Organization 1.

6: STONE testified falsely that he had never discussed his conversations with the person he referred to as his “go-between,” “mutual friend,” and “intermediary” with anyone involved in the Trump Campaign.


COUNT SEVEN (Witness Tampering)
Between in or around September 2017 and present, within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendant ROGER JASON STONE, JR., knowingly and intentionally corruptly persuaded and attempted to corruptly persuade another person, to wit: Person 2, with intent to influence, delay, and prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding
 
Or it could be a Paul Manafort, as the high ranking official.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download

Sorry, it's longer than a tweet. I know this means most of you won't read it and will parrot what you are told to parrot about it.

For those with intellects whose bandwidths are bigger than a bumper sticker, it's a fascinating read. It goes into great detail about Roger Stone's communications with Assange through intermediaries. There are emails and texts which make it very clear that Stone was indeed communicating with Assange, just as he bragged he was doing all during the late stages of the 2016 campaign.

Cast of Characters:

"Person 1" is Jerome Corsi.

"Person 2" is Randy Credico (Randy Credico - Wikipedia)

"Organization 1" is Wikileaks.

"High-ranking Trump Campaign Official" is Steve Bannon.


Randy Credico was Stone's intermediary to Assange.


Paragraph 15.e.:

On or about September 30, 2016, Person 2 sent STONE via text message a photograph of Person 2 standing outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where the head of Organization 1 was located.
No, it's Bannon.

Steve Bannon is the 'high-ranking Trump campaign official' mentioned in Roger Stone's indictment

  • This source added that Bannon has spoken with Mueller's team, along with the Senate Intelligence Committee, about the exchange.
 
I suppose someday we will all see that text message photo of Credico standing outside the Ecuadoran embassy.

Stone's tits are in a wringer.
 
This thread is now the result of about 8 merges on the Roger Stone drama. Moved to politics where it belongs. Any other threads on this topic BELONG HERE as comments. Or risk being closed/trashed/warned... Not everyone gets their OWN Roger Stone news free for all.. Or two -- or three....
 
Or it could be a Paul Manafort, as the high ranking official.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download

Sorry, it's longer than a tweet. I know this means most of you won't read it and will parrot what you are told to parrot about it.

For those with intellects whose bandwidths are bigger than a bumper sticker, it's a fascinating read. It goes into great detail about Roger Stone's communications with Assange through intermediaries. There are emails and texts which make it very clear that Stone was indeed communicating with Assange, just as he bragged he was doing all during the late stages of the 2016 campaign.

Cast of Characters:

"Person 1" is Jerome Corsi.

"Person 2" is Randy Credico (Randy Credico - Wikipedia)

"Organization 1" is Wikileaks.

"High-ranking Trump Campaign Official" is Steve Bannon.


Randy Credico was Stone's intermediary to Assange.


Paragraph 15.e.:

On or about September 30, 2016, Person 2 sent STONE via text message a photograph of Person 2 standing outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where the head of Organization 1 was located.
He's described as the head of an on line news organization.

Banon
 
LOL

That’s not a “Russian agent,” it’s Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister. What crime does your conservative brain claim he committed?
She's obviously colluding with the Russians.
Colluding what? What crime did Lavrov commit?

I can’t help but notice you brain-dead cons can’t do anything more than babble incoherently.
You turds claim collusion with Russians is a crime. That's what Hillary is doing, dumbass.

Their Trump hating goggles don't see it.
I know. Mueller comes down on an Republican who even mentioned Hillary's emails like a ton of bricks, but Hillary gets away with actual crimes like destroying them after they were subpoenaed.
Those Dems aren't paying Mueller to look up Hillary skirt.
 
Once Barr becomes AG, this kind of shit will end. It's improper, and Barr won't allow it. That's why it happened now. It's Mueller's last chance to persecute innocent people.
LOLOL

And by “this kind of shit,” you mean indicting people for lying to federal investigators and obstructing justice.

The evidence for that is nonexistent. Mueller told numerous lie in the indictment, like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC. There isn't a shred of evidence for that.

In the case of Popodopolous it meant not remembering something he said weeks earlier.

Mueller is a thug. Finding evidence of collusion is not what he's doing. His only agenda is getting the President by any means possible. When he's under Barr's thumb, his reign of terror will be over.
”like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC.”

LOLOLOL

The indictment states no such thing, ya fucking moron. It says Assange released emails “stolen by others.”

2s0blvo.jpg


Do you ever post anything that isn’t fucking moronic?

Ever???
It says the following, you piece of shit liar:

"After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1 (Wikileaks)."
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

LOLOL

Fucking moron, that means WikiLeaks released stolen emails, not that WikiLeaks stole the email.

How should you know that? It says so in the indictment...

”From in or around July 2016 through in or around November 2016, an organization (“Organization 1”), which had previously posted documents stolen by others from U.S. persons, entities, and the U.S. government, released tens of thousands of documents stolen from the DNC and the personal email account of the chairman of the U.S. presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton (“Clinton Campaign”)
That quote isn't in the indictment, you lying piece of shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top