Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even worse for Stone, the indictment states a “senior Trump campaign official” was directed to contact Stone about the hacked emails. The list of names of those who could direct a “senior Trump campaign official” is very short. Extremely short.Oh?Wut?? You think we’re angry Stone was indicted???
![]()
This nothingburger indictment stunt just backfired.
Nothing will happen to him.
Either he flips and tells Mueller how trump directed the entire conspiracy...or he goes to jail...Pretty simple really.
Too late for a Pardon...and even if there was one....his right to plead the 5th Amendment...will be gone.
Stone is being defiant for the moment and will likely not reveal who was directed to contact him, of more importantly, who directed the “senior Trump campaign official.”
To break his defiance, I imagine Mueller is going to throw the proverbial book at him to persuade him to name names. Stone is looking at a very long prison sentence unless he gives up that name.
No one is claiming collusion is a crime. It’s been said over and over there is no such crime as collusion.You turds claim collusion with Russians is a crime. That's what Hillary is doing, dumbass.Colluding what? What crime did Lavrov commit?She's obviously colluding with the Russians.LOLWhy would he do that when he was in direct contact with the Russian hacker?![]()
Actually Cooked Hillary was the one to have "direct contact" with Russian agents. Which makes a good conversation on who's to blame for framing Roger Stone. Your mindless jargon is pointing out the Clinton's behind all of this framing.
That’s not a “Russian agent,” it’s Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister. What crime does your conservative brain claim he committed?
I can’t help but notice you brain-dead cons can’t do anything more than babble incoherently.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download
Sorry, it's longer than a tweet. I know this means most of you won't read it and will parrot what you are told to parrot about it.
For those with intellects whose bandwidths are bigger than a bumper sticker, it's a fascinating read. It goes into great detail about Roger Stone's communications with Assange through intermediaries. There are emails and texts which make it very clear that Stone was indeed communicating with Assange, just as he bragged he was doing all during the late stages of the 2016 campaign.
Cast of Characters:
"Person 1" is Jerome Corsi.
"Person 2" is Randy Credico (Randy Credico - Wikipedia)
"Organization 1" is Wikileaks.
"High-ranking Trump Campaign Official" is Steve Bannon.
Randy Credico was Stone's intermediary to Assange.
Paragraph 15.e.:
On or about September 30, 2016, Person 2 sent STONE via text message a photograph of Person 2 standing outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where the head of Organization 1 was located.
No one is claiming collusion is a crime. It’s been said over and over there is no such crime as collusion.[/QUOTE]You turds claim collusion with Russians is a crime. That's what Hillary is doing, dumbass.Colluding what? What crime did Lavrov commit?She's obviously colluding with the Russians.LOL![]()
Actually Cooked Hillary was the one to have "direct contact" with Russian agents. Which makes a good conversation on who's to blame for framing Roger Stone. Your mindless jargon is pointing out the Clinton's behind all of this framing.
That’s not a “Russian agent,” it’s Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister. What crime does your conservative brain claim he committed?
I can’t help but notice you brain-dead cons can’t do anything more than babble incoherently.
LOLOLYou're asking us to trust the Intelligence community run by Brennan, Comey and Clapper?Oh, fucking moron? You have evidence our intelligence community is wrong about Russians hacking the DNC email?That's also a lie.”like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC.”LOLOL
And by “this kind of shit,” you mean indicting people for lying to federal investigators and obstructing justice.
The evidence for that is nonexistent. Mueller told numerous lie in the indictment, like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC. There isn't a shred of evidence for that.
In the case of Popodopolous it meant not remembering something he said weeks earlier.
Mueller is a thug. Finding evidence of collusion is not what he's doing. His only agenda is getting the President by any means possible. When he's under Barr's thumb, his reign of terror will be over.
LOLOLOL
The indictment states no such thing, ya fucking moron. It says Assange released emails “stolen by others.”
![]()
Do you ever post anything that isn’t fucking moronic?
Ever???
Let’s see it......
Really?
Maybe the Russian translation says that but in ENGLISH it talks about collusion with Trump officials...Between Stone Banon and someone above himbrothers and sisters, the claim of Russian collusion is a politically motivated fairy tale!
It literally says in the Stone indictment that there was no Russian collusion. If there was then why was he charged with trying to get ahold of the emails.
Which is what everyone was trying to do.
No, it's Bannon.Or it could be a Paul Manafort, as the high ranking official.https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download
Sorry, it's longer than a tweet. I know this means most of you won't read it and will parrot what you are told to parrot about it.
For those with intellects whose bandwidths are bigger than a bumper sticker, it's a fascinating read. It goes into great detail about Roger Stone's communications with Assange through intermediaries. There are emails and texts which make it very clear that Stone was indeed communicating with Assange, just as he bragged he was doing all during the late stages of the 2016 campaign.
Cast of Characters:
"Person 1" is Jerome Corsi.
"Person 2" is Randy Credico (Randy Credico - Wikipedia)
"Organization 1" is Wikileaks.
"High-ranking Trump Campaign Official" is Steve Bannon.
Randy Credico was Stone's intermediary to Assange.
Paragraph 15.e.:
On or about September 30, 2016, Person 2 sent STONE via text message a photograph of Person 2 standing outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where the head of Organization 1 was located.
They could have asked him to turn himself in, he presents no danger, this was political theater at it's worst and most hypocritical.
I hope you libs are pleased with this clown show.
He's described as the head of an on line news organization.Or it could be a Paul Manafort, as the high ranking official.https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download
Sorry, it's longer than a tweet. I know this means most of you won't read it and will parrot what you are told to parrot about it.
For those with intellects whose bandwidths are bigger than a bumper sticker, it's a fascinating read. It goes into great detail about Roger Stone's communications with Assange through intermediaries. There are emails and texts which make it very clear that Stone was indeed communicating with Assange, just as he bragged he was doing all during the late stages of the 2016 campaign.
Cast of Characters:
"Person 1" is Jerome Corsi.
"Person 2" is Randy Credico (Randy Credico - Wikipedia)
"Organization 1" is Wikileaks.
"High-ranking Trump Campaign Official" is Steve Bannon.
Randy Credico was Stone's intermediary to Assange.
Paragraph 15.e.:
On or about September 30, 2016, Person 2 sent STONE via text message a photograph of Person 2 standing outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where the head of Organization 1 was located.
Stone said he nearly had to take off his clothes from getting terrorized.I’m surprised Mueller’s gestapo didn’t execute him when he answered the door.
Those Dems aren't paying Mueller to look up Hillary skirt.I know. Mueller comes down on an Republican who even mentioned Hillary's emails like a ton of bricks, but Hillary gets away with actual crimes like destroying them after they were subpoenaed.You turds claim collusion with Russians is a crime. That's what Hillary is doing, dumbass.Colluding what? What crime did Lavrov commit?She's obviously colluding with the Russians.LOL
That’s not a “Russian agent,” it’s Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister. What crime does your conservative brain claim he committed?
I can’t help but notice you brain-dead cons can’t do anything more than babble incoherently.
Their Trump hating goggles don't see it.
That quote isn't in the indictment, you lying piece of shit.Holyfuckingshit!It says the following, you piece of shit liar:”like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC.”LOLOLOnce Barr becomes AG, this kind of shit will end. It's improper, and Barr won't allow it. That's why it happened now. It's Mueller's last chance to persecute innocent people.
And by “this kind of shit,” you mean indicting people for lying to federal investigators and obstructing justice.
The evidence for that is nonexistent. Mueller told numerous lie in the indictment, like the claim the Assange "stole" emails from the DNC. There isn't a shred of evidence for that.
In the case of Popodopolous it meant not remembering something he said weeks earlier.
Mueller is a thug. Finding evidence of collusion is not what he's doing. His only agenda is getting the President by any means possible. When he's under Barr's thumb, his reign of terror will be over.
LOLOLOL
The indictment states no such thing, ya fucking moron. It says Assange released emails “stolen by others.”
![]()
Do you ever post anything that isn’t fucking moronic?
Ever???
"After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1 (Wikileaks)."
LOLOL
Fucking moron, that means WikiLeaks released stolen emails, not that WikiLeaks stole the email.
How should you know that? It says so in the indictment...
”From in or around July 2016 through in or around November 2016, an organization (“Organization 1”), which had previously posted documents stolen by others from U.S. persons, entities, and the U.S. government, released tens of thousands of documents stolen from the DNC and the personal email account of the chairman of the U.S. presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton (“Clinton Campaign”)