Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,375
- 81,309
- 2,635
LOLOLOLThat's what you do when you can't prove your point.Again, spits the fucking moron who denied the highlighted text below is in the indictment though said fucking moron claims to have read it...Link Trump to what, perfectly legal activities? Here's clue for you, dumbass, talking to Julian Assange is not a crime. Many journalists have done it, and Mueller hasn't indicted them. Perhaps when you can find an actual crime the Trump has committed, people won't laugh at your ravings.What Mueller needs is to link Trump so he can be impeached. Otherwise, Trump will just pardon everyone involved. That’s why Stone is parading false bravado— he’s expecting a presidential pardon to keep him out of prison.Mueller needs proof to name them. That’s where applying pressure on Stone comes in. Especially if one of them was Trump.
Mueller is building a wheel. He is using the spokes to get to the center....He knows exactly what happened. I expect trump wished that he had that questionaire back now....It won't take much for a perjury charge...as for Junior and Kushner...they have lied numerous times. Mueller knows that also.
Nah.
Day in and day out, you prove you have no fucking clue what you’re talking about.
Fucking moron, you idiotically claimed the indictment was bullshit because it falsely stated that Wikileaks stole emails. My point, which I prove every time I post this, is you’re a fucking moron for believing that since the indictment actually states Wikileaks DIDN’T steal them. And when I quoted the indictment saying Wikileaks didn’t steal the e-mails, you called me a piece of shit liar for posting something that’s not in the indictment, when in fact, you’re the piece of shit liar because it is...
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi65.tinypic.com%2F2dam8v8.jpg&hash=7d7de92489749b6ea66ff5be694ab388)