🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

BREAKING: Supreme Court will take up Gay Marriage Case

Shall I go on?
I have heard it said that suicide is a viable option for some people. Imagine that

Oh, here we go. Either you're telling me I should die for having opposing views to yours on "gay marriage" or you're going to next trot out the old LGBT favorite of "gay teen suicides" to get what you want.

You are vile either way.

Read it again:


Might want to read the poll results here: Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings Page 690 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum with 82% opposed to gay marriage being forced on churches.

...And the Bocott A&E Facebook page getting a million "likes" in less than 24 hours in support of Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson's stance against gay marriage....And the Chick Fil-A protest day:

chickfilacardrivein_zpsb2be6ae5.jpg

chickfilabagforeground_zps18d52d68.jpg


Funny how for such a "popular cause"...Judge Sutton of the 6th circuit noted how even when it comes up for a regular vote, the LGBT activists quickly remove it from the ballot...Seems a popular win would only bolster their momentum...?

Page 25 of Opinion:
"..Ohio same-sex marriage advocates opted not to place the question on the 2014 state ballot despite collecting nearly twice the number of required signatures). What the Court recently said about another statewide initiative that people care passionately about applies with equal vigor here: “Deliberative debate on sensitive issues such as racial preferences all too often may shade into rancor. But that does not justify removing certain court-determined issues from the voters’ reach. Democracy does not presume that some subjects are either too divisive or too profound for public debate.” 14-1341 184 6th Circuit Decision in Marriage Cases

It was removed from the ballot because the LGBT activists were deathly afraid their "everyone approves of gay marriage" smoke and mirrors campaign would be laid bare for all to see.
The evidence stands opposed to your conclusion "rightwinger"..
Poll after poll that directly asks about gay marriage is not a true gauge of the public. The real gauge of the public opinion are lines at fast food joint, "likes" on Facebook, and a USMB poll. lol. Desperation thy name is Sil.
You can always tell the will of the people by looking at the lines at Chick Fil-a

Don't forget about Facebook. Shakira has the most "likes" and therefore she must be the most popular and loved person in America.
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.
No one is seeking to 'redefine' marriage – marriage is the union of two equal, consenting adult partners recognized by the state – same- or opposite-sex, it makes no difference.

Allowing same-sex couples access to marriage law in accordance with the 14th Amendment in no way 'changes' marriage, as same-sex couples are currently eligible to participate in marriage contract law.

Nor is anyone seeking to change the definition of marriage in the context of religious doctrine and dogma, where 14th Amendment jurisprudence does not apply to private persons or organizations such as churches, and religious entities remain at liberty to perceive religious marriage as between a man and a woman.

Last, what may or may not be perceived as 'normal' is subjective and legally irrelevant, having no bearing whatsoever on the issue of same-sex couples accessing marriage law.
 
It all depends on whether or not you see marriage as an institution preserved for the wellbeing of adults, or one more primarily maintained for the benefit of the formative environment where kids are raised.

Depending on which emphasis the Court gives its consideration is how the chips will fall at the end of this. So-called "gay marriage" offers children no different structure than single parents: the deprivation to children 100% of the time of the opposite gender vital as their role model.
It depends on whether states hostile to gay Americans can defend their measures denying same-sex couples access to marriage law in court, which they cannot.

Measures seeking to deny gay Americans access to marriage law lack a rational basis, they are devoid of objective, documented evidence, and they pursue no proper legislative end; indeed, measures seeking to deny gay Americans access to marriage law are motivated solely by animus toward gay Americans, which the 14th Amendment prohibits the states from doing (Romer v. Evans (1996)).

The 'argument' that marriage exists to promote procreation fails as opposite-sex couples who are infertile are allowed to marry. There is no objective, documented evidence in support of the notion that children in same-sex homes are at some sort of 'disadvantage.' And the 'tradition argument' that marriage has 'historically' been between only a man and woman fails because the doctrine of coverture is no longer part of any state's marriage contract law.

Therefore, absent a rational basis, objective, documented evidence in support, and a proper legislative end, the Supreme Court can come only to the legal and Constitutional conclusion that laws denying same-sex couples access to marriage law exist only to make gay Americans different from everyone else, predicated on an unwarranted animus toward gay Americans. “This [the states] cannot do. A State cannot so deem a class of persons a stranger to its laws.” ibid
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Why do you get to define the relationship of other people?

Just because you find it "yucky" does not mean you get to force the government to support your hatred
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Are you claiming to be "normal"? :eek:

Because judging from your posts you are abnormal when it comes to what it means to be an American. Genuine normal Americans uphold the rights of everyone to be treated equally under the law. You don't so that makes you abnormal rather than gays.
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Are you claiming to be "normal"? :eek:

Because judging from your posts you are abnormal when it comes to what it means to be an American. Genuine normal Americans uphold the rights of everyone to be treated equally under the law. You don't so that makes you abnormal rather than gays.
Irony alert!


:rofl:
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Why do you get to define the relationship of other people?

Just because you find it "yucky" does not mean you get to force the government to support your hatred
Ah, the typical retard response. I didn't say I want to define relationship, you half wit. I said the people should be allowed to define marriage. Which words are too big for you?
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Are you claiming to be "normal"? :eek:

Because judging from your posts you are abnormal when it comes to what it means to be an American. Genuine normal Americans uphold the rights of everyone to be treated equally under the law. You don't so that makes you abnormal rather than gays.
Wrong. Most of the states with gay marriage was against the will of the people. If someone needs to define what's normal for you, you don't fit the definition.
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Why do you get to define the relationship of other people?

Just because you find it "yucky" does not mean you get to force the government to support your hatred
Ah, the typical retard response. I didn't say I want to define relationship, you half wit. I said the people should be allowed to define marriage. Which words are too big for you?
So you are excluding yourself from what you call a normal person and deciding you get to force society to follow your hatred against gay relationships
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Are you claiming to be "normal"? :eek:

Because judging from your posts you are abnormal when it comes to what it means to be an American. Genuine normal Americans uphold the rights of everyone to be treated equally under the law. You don't so that makes you abnormal rather than gays.
Wrong. Most of the states with gay marriage was against the will of the people. If someone needs to define what's normal for you, you don't fit the definition.

Every recent poll shows the people supporting gay marriage

Where does that leave you?
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Why do you get to define the relationship of other people?

Just because you find it "yucky" does not mean you get to force the government to support your hatred
Ah, the typical retard response. I didn't say I want to define relationship, you half wit. I said the people should be allowed to define marriage. Which words are too big for you?
So you are excluding yourself from what you call a normal person and deciding you get to force society to follow your hatred against gay relationships
I think retards should be cared for. They cannot function on their own. Please have your guardian explain it to you.
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Are you claiming to be "normal"? :eek:

Because judging from your posts you are abnormal when it comes to what it means to be an American. Genuine normal Americans uphold the rights of everyone to be treated equally under the law. You don't so that makes you abnormal rather than gays.
Wrong. Most of the states with gay marriage was against the will of the people. If someone needs to define what's normal for you, you don't fit the definition.

Every recent poll shows the people supporting gay marriage

Where does that leave you?
Not in the states where it was shot down. Maybe someone could put that in a coloring book for you?
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Are you claiming to be "normal"? :eek:

Because judging from your posts you are abnormal when it comes to what it means to be an American. Genuine normal Americans uphold the rights of everyone to be treated equally under the law. You don't so that makes you abnormal rather than gays.
Wrong. Most of the states with gay marriage was against the will of the people. If someone needs to define what's normal for you, you don't fit the definition.

Every recent poll shows the people supporting gay marriage

Where does that leave you?
Not in the states where it was shot down. Maybe someone could put that in a coloring book for you?

Yes...the Bible Belt still hates fags
That will probably never change

Doesn't mean they should force their hatred on the rest of the country
 
Simple answer to your question. Gays to not want exceptional treatment, they want their relationships to have the same legal status as any other relationship
And the normal people don't want marriage defined as two dudes or two chicks. Marriage honors the special relationship between opposite genders for reasons obvious to said normal people.

Why do you get to define the relationship of other people?

Just because you find it "yucky" does not mean you get to force the government to support your hatred
Ah, the typical retard response. I didn't say I want to define relationship, you half wit. I said the people should be allowed to define marriage. Which words are too big for you?
nitwit, and in a legal contract between two persons
 
nitwit, and in a legal contract between two persons
Why two?
because it is a for the purposes of joining two people. We can make multiple marriages legal if we want, but not by arguing over the laws as they stand today. The Courts have ruled marriage is a right. Marriage in the legal sense is a contract between two people.
 

Forum List

Back
Top