🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

BREAKING! The Florida Grand Jury Was Never Told About 'The Presidential Records Act' Or The 'Clinton Socks Case', Both Exonerating!

The truth is the last thing you will get on the website.
We don't care anymore. We know the constitution is usurped from evil and their followers now.
^^^ This is exactly what I've been talking about for a long time now.

They don't care.

There are no more rules for them. Nothing that Trump or any MAGA nut does matters, no matter how dishonest or illegal or wrong it is. NONE of them are going to be held accountable for ANYTHING.

These people really do believe that they and Trump are saving America from Satan. This is a fuckin' madness.
 
^^^ This is exactly what I've been talking about for a long time now.

They don't care.

There are no more rules for them. Nothing that Trump or any MAGA nut does matters, no matter how dishonest or illegal or wrong it is. NONE of them are going to be held accountable for ANYTHING.

These people really do believe that they and Trump are saving America from Satan. This is a fuckin' madness.
/----/ Rainbow Tissue?
iu
 
So trump is saying he did all those criminal acts? But should get off cuz of Bill Clinton?

Trump really needs to learn to keep his mouth shut....everything he says can be used against him! :eek:

The PRA does not cover national defense documents. The espionage act, (though not all espionage), is the criminal code covering for what Trump did, not the Presidential Records act...
/-----/ "So trump is saying he did all those criminal acts? But should get off cuz of Bill Clinton?"
No, you blithering idiot. Trump is saying the acts WERE NOT criminal in the first place.
 
Well what do you know!!!

Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The "Clinton Sock Drawer Case" had to do with audio tapes Clinton had commissioned. They were PERSONAL record and not OFFICIAL records.

Trump had OFFICIAL records.

Apples and oranges
 
^^^ This is exactly what I've been talking about for a long time now.

They don't care.

There are no more rules for them. Nothing that Trump or any MAGA nut does matters, no matter how dishonest or illegal or wrong it is. NONE of them are going to be held accountable for ANYTHING.

These people really do believe that they and Trump are saving America from Satan. This is a fuckin' madness.
It's the Hitler atoms at work.
 
the PRA is civil, not criminal. and even Trump trying to use the PRA as an excuse.... is a fallacy, not true or factual. Read it.
Tom Finton is not a lawyer, and Trump unwisely took his opinion and advice and interpretation, even though Trump was advised on several occasions by the government on what the PRA rules were....
1. The PRA is NOT a criminal statute. There can be no crimes for violating it.
2. Finton explains presidential records and FOIA and NARA
 
1. The PRA is NOT a criminal statute. There can be no crimes for violating it.
2. Finton explains presidential records and FOIA and NARA


Judicial Watch...

These are the people that lost the case they brought against the NARA trying to force them to force Clinton to turn over personal audio tapes made with a journalist for material for a book right?

WW
 
Again...Clinton had to do with PERSONAL records...Trump stole OFFICIAL records.
The statutes deal with OFFICIAL records
WRONG.
Clinton's tapes also had official actions recorded, not just private reflections, so they are, like Nixon's tapes, presidential records.
The court said that since Clinton held the tapes as personal and had possession of them, they are in-fact his personal records.
So the battle-line should be, using the PRA, defining personal records vs state secrets that Trump should not have.
State secrets should be returned without penalty, such as for Pence, Biden, and Sandy Berger.
 
WRONG.
Clinton's tapes also had official actions recorded, not just private reflections, so they are, like Nixon's tapes, presidential records.
The court said that since Clinton held the tapes as personal and had possession of them, they are in-fact his personal records.
So the battle-line should be, using the PRA, defining personal records vs state secrets that Trump should not have.
State secrets should be returned without penalty, such as for Pence, Biden, and Sandy Berger.
The Court ruled that they were NOT official records

There is no doubt that what Trump stole were official records
 
Judicial Watch...
These are the people that lost the case they brought against the NARA trying to force them to force Clinton to turn over personal audio tapes made with a journalist for material for a book right?
WW
Yes. But the tapes did have official actions recorded as well, not just personal reflections.
The point that helps Trump is that the Clinton "precedent" says that if Trump possesses a record it is legally his personal property.
 
Yes. But the tapes did have official actions recorded as well, not just personal reflections.
The point that helps Trump is that the Clinton "precedent" says that if Trump possesses a record it is legally his personal property.
Again...the Court ruled that they were NOT official records
 

Forum List

Back
Top