Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
That said, while I disagree with their use vs Japan since by that time it was redundant and mostly a tech-demo, I'm not against their use now against ISIS. Albeit even smaller tactical yield type weapons ~5kt range.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To Delat4Embassey: Communist are still pissing and moaning about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, even though Russia is growing in military strength while America is shrinking its nuclear arsenal thanks to New START.DPRK has nukes but hasn't used them; Pakistan has them and hasn't used them, India, Russia, UK, Israel, etc. No one's used them ever. Oh except us. Twice.
Only nation not trustworthy with nukes then is the USA.
To Delat4Embassey: That is nonsense. Saving American lives was the reason Truman dropped two bombs on the country that started the war.That said, while I disagree with their use vs Japan since by that time it was redundant and mostly a tech-demo,
To Delat4Embassey: So you are not opposed to killing, you just want to limit the number of dead enemies. Or is it that you do not want America to fight a winnable war with total victory as the goal; i.e. PEACE WITHOUT VICTORY?I'm not against their use now against ISIS. Albeit even smaller tactical yield type weapons ~5kt range.
Incidentally, when Taqiyya the Liar pulled out of Iraq after the war was won, he effectively armed ISIS with military vehicles, tanks, small arms, and so on. He can no more be trusted to disarm ISIS than he will disarm Iran after he gives them nuclear weapons. I am waiting for him to say trust ISIS, too.
To KissMy: You are wrong every time you say it. See my responses to you in this thread:Bush lost Iraq, armed ISIS, promised & allowed Iran Nukes!
To KissMy: You are wrong every time you say it. See my responses to you in this thread:Bush lost Iraq, armed ISIS, promised & allowed Iran Nukes!
If Everybody Had Bows & Arrows Nobody Would Use Them! | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
To KissMy: You must do your research in comic books. You missed this issueObama killed 5 times more terrorist than Reagan & both Bush's did in their 20 years as presidents.
even though Russia is growing in military strength while America is shrinking its nuclear arsenal thanks to New START.
Do you know, how many missiles Russia is sawing to trash, believing to "Peace Initiative" and "Trusted Agreements"? While you, Americans, were stamping this: Cold War Victory Medal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ? US promises not to break borders of Warsaw block. Where's NATO now?
Thanks God, we lost the weapon but didn't lost technologies and restored the potential. With experience - never trust to US government again.
To Sbiker: Nor am I.I'm not a professional translator or writer
To Sbiker: Speaking for myself, I do not give a rat’s ass about the view from the other side. I can do quite well without associating with the people “. . . from the other side.” Can they say the same about the people on my side? In fact, I would be overjoyed if busybody Americans emigrated to the “other side” instead of destroying this country by bringing the people from the other side here.I'm just trying to explain, how the world situation is visible from the other side.
To Sbiker: You only have to decide if absolute power in the hands of Russians, or Chinese, or Muslims would practice restraint as do Americans. The history of totalitarian political systems says otherwise.You speaking about growing military strength of Russia. But budget of Russian Army is less than US in many times: Military budget of the Russian Federation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. And it's not a growing, it's just restoring army after 90x.
To Sbiker: Are you talking about the peninsula or the people who live there? As far as I know an overwhelming number of Crimeans prefer sovereignty. Ditto Ukrainians.You speaking about aggression of Russia in Crimea. Do you know, Crimea is Russian
To Sbiker: The Russian government at the time sold Alaska. Americans did not take it by force.much more times, than Alaska of Hawaii are belong to US?
To Sbiker: Your position about “stupid shit” is too unclear for me to respond.Why I'm talking about it? Because US begin to trust in this propaganda and making "stupid shit" in foreign policy more and more... It strongly remember me last days of Soviet Union -
To Sbiker: In the future, please try to distinguish between territory and ideology.I know, what was Soviet Union and don't want return of them in new incarnation, under the skin of US.
To Sbiker: Speaking for myself, I do not give a rat’s ass about the view from the other side. I can do quite well without associating with the people “. . . from the other side.” Can they say the same about the people on my side? In fact, I would be overjoyed if busybody Americans emigrated to the “other side” instead of destroying this country by bringing the people from the other side here.
To Sbiker: You only have to decide if absolute power in the hands of Russians, or Chinese, or Muslims would practice restraint as do Americans. The history of totalitarian political systems says otherwise.
To Sbiker: Are you talking about the peninsula or the people who live there? As far as I know an overwhelming number of Crimeans prefer sovereignty. Ditto Ukrainians.
To Sbiker: The Russian government at the time sold Alaska. Americans did not take it by force.
Hawaii was annexed. There was no military force involved. Hawaiians voted for statehood.
Incidentally, part of America’s history was nothing more than an advanced culture overwhelming a primitive culture. And please spare me the nonsense about the Indians who were here first. I’ve heard it all before.
To Sbiker: Your position about “stupid shit” is too unclear for me to respond.
To Sbiker: This is where I get off:To Sbiker: Speaking for myself, I do not give a rat’s ass about the view from the other side. I can do quite well without associating with the people “. . . from the other side.” Can they say the same about the people on my side? In fact, I would be overjoyed if busybody Americans emigrated to the “other side” instead of destroying this country by bringing the people from the other side here.
I'm not convincing you with anyone. I'm trying to find out the "not red and not thin" line, where your "don't know" transforms to your "I don't want to know"...
To Sbiker: You only have to decide if absolute power in the hands of Russians, or Chinese, or Muslims would practice restraint as do Americans. The history of totalitarian political systems says otherwise.
Forced propagation of single view, single laws, single currency all over the world - this is a real totalitarism. Total representation of the nation, total guidance of national goals, total navy presence at all oceans of world, including territorial waters of many other states. It's not my opinion, just read definition of totalitarism in wiki!
To Sbiker: Are you talking about the peninsula or the people who live there? As far as I know an overwhelming number of Crimeans prefer sovereignty. Ditto Ukrainians.
The official result from the Autonomous Republic of Crimea was a 96.77% percent vote for integration of the region into the Russian Federation. It's information from english-language wiki too... Overwhelming 3.3%?
To Sbiker: The Russian government at the time sold Alaska. Americans did not take it by force.
Hawaii was annexed. There was no military force involved. Hawaiians voted for statehood.
But Crimea peninsula already WAS a Russian. And was given to Ukraine by Criminal Commie Regime. So, I don't see any annexations - only returning back the property of Russia as act of correction the results of Communism crimes.
Incidentally, part of America’s history was nothing more than an advanced culture overwhelming a primitive culture. And please spare me the nonsense about the Indians who were here first. I’ve heard it all before.
I know history, it's a truth. But when you're calling Crimea returning as "annexation", you're playing at commie side, did you thought about it?
To Sbiker: Your position about “stupid shit” is too unclear for me to respond.
Let's explain. For example, remember the incident of giving about 2000 humwees to terroristic forces.
Just great: Iraq may have lost more than 2,000 Humvees to ISIS « Hot Air
Offcourse, when this gift was performed, politicians 99% said something like "moderate opposition", "democracy" and bla bla bla, but in fact it was straight gift to ISIS, which performes terroristic acts (including Paris) and kills american citizens.
What it was? Why? US government is real ally of ISIS, instead of EU states (which doesn't recieve similar gifts)? Someone of the bosses inside White house is hard corrupted, to do it, bypassing US nation interests? Or experts in US government are stupid enough to fail this simplest situation?
Do you understand me? Any case of these is "stupid shit". That is what Obama says about. And at last time US really doing a lot of "stupid shit" in world politics.
To Sbiker: This is where I get off:To Sbiker: Speaking for myself, I do not give a rat’s ass about the view from the other side. I can do quite well without associating with the people “. . . from the other side.” Can they say the same about the people on my side? In fact, I would be overjoyed if busybody Americans emigrated to the “other side” instead of destroying this country by bringing the people from the other side here.
I'm not convincing you with anyone. I'm trying to find out the "not red and not thin" line, where your "don't know" transforms to your "I don't want to know"...
To Sbiker: You only have to decide if absolute power in the hands of Russians, or Chinese, or Muslims would practice restraint as do Americans. The history of totalitarian political systems says otherwise.
Forced propagation of single view, single laws, single currency all over the world - this is a real totalitarism. Total representation of the nation, total guidance of national goals, total navy presence at all oceans of world, including territorial waters of many other states. It's not my opinion, just read definition of totalitarism in wiki!
To Sbiker: Are you talking about the peninsula or the people who live there? As far as I know an overwhelming number of Crimeans prefer sovereignty. Ditto Ukrainians.
The official result from the Autonomous Republic of Crimea was a 96.77% percent vote for integration of the region into the Russian Federation. It's information from english-language wiki too... Overwhelming 3.3%?
To Sbiker: The Russian government at the time sold Alaska. Americans did not take it by force.
Hawaii was annexed. There was no military force involved. Hawaiians voted for statehood.
But Crimea peninsula already WAS a Russian. And was given to Ukraine by Criminal Commie Regime. So, I don't see any annexations - only returning back the property of Russia as act of correction the results of Communism crimes.
Incidentally, part of America’s history was nothing more than an advanced culture overwhelming a primitive culture. And please spare me the nonsense about the Indians who were here first. I’ve heard it all before.
I know history, it's a truth. But when you're calling Crimea returning as "annexation", you're playing at commie side, did you thought about it?
To Sbiker: Your position about “stupid shit” is too unclear for me to respond.
Let's explain. For example, remember the incident of giving about 2000 humwees to terroristic forces.
Just great: Iraq may have lost more than 2,000 Humvees to ISIS « Hot Air
Offcourse, when this gift was performed, politicians 99% said something like "moderate opposition", "democracy" and bla bla bla, but in fact it was straight gift to ISIS, which performes terroristic acts (including Paris) and kills american citizens.
What it was? Why? US government is real ally of ISIS, instead of EU states (which doesn't recieve similar gifts)? Someone of the bosses inside White house is hard corrupted, to do it, bypassing US nation interests? Or experts in US government are stupid enough to fail this simplest situation?
Do you understand me? Any case of these is "stupid shit". That is what Obama says about. And at last time US really doing a lot of "stupid shit" in world politics.
I do not know everything the number one America-hater can say. I do know what he will say in doublespeak: White Christian Americans did it:To Delat4Embassey: Communist are still pissing and moaning about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, even though Russia is growing in military strength while America is shrinking its nuclear arsenal thanks to New START.