Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #81
I just did, you're just not very bright, asswipe.Show me what is wrong, dummy?Logically, if you've never backed up what you say with proper, relevant links, then you haven't actually proven anything, just gave an opinion.Still not proving anything, Taz. You have to logically show the error.Here you go jizz guzzler, "Once again... Copy a sentence I wrote and explain how it is wrong. You can't do it. The proof of evidence is in your court, dummy." The proof of evidence isn't in my court because you've never proven anything, just gave your OPINION.Once again... Copy a sentence I wrote and explain how it is wrong. You can't do it. The proof of evidence is in your court, dummy.Everything you've said without backing it up is bogus. Which is everything you've ever said.No. You haven't. Copy a sentence I wrote and explain how it is wrong. You can't do it. The proof of evidence is in your court, dummy.I’ve already proven that you can’t back up what you say with links that are scientific and relevant to what you’re saying.The proof of evidence is in your court.Your link is broken.Copy a sentence I wrote and explain how it is wrong. You can't do it.It’s an opinion, because you provide no link to back yourself up. I could care less what your opinion is.Sure did. Pick pick out one thing I wrote that you can prove is wrong.I think that you have yet to prove your invisible friend, and science doesn’t either, otherwise provide a link that says so.Same answer as the last one, dummy. Science says everything I posted about examining the natural world. Logic concludes the rest.You can’t scientifically tie them into what you’re saying. EPIC FAIL.Again... Physical laws of nature, biological laws of nature and moral laws of nature are not opinions, dummy.Proof isn’t your personal opinion. You suck at this.Your typical critical theory response. My burden of proof has been satisfied. Now provide your burden of proof for why you believe as you do.You have no links that show that what you said scientifically ties into it.Physical laws of nature, biological laws of nature and moral laws of nature are not opinions, dummy.See? You post your personal opinion because you have no links that tie what you say to empirical scientific evidence. Every. Single. Time.I have. Many times. The physical laws of nature, the biological laws of nature and the moral laws of nature all point to intelligence as the source or matrix of existence. You are the one who has no proof.If you put an idea forward, it's up to you to back up what you say, otherwise, what you say is meaningless and just an opinion from someone who can't EVER back his shit up.It's not my burden to prove anything to you. I don't care what you believe. I don't care if you suffer through life. Your suffering through life is your burden and your proof.Try explaining that to ding.Burden of proof (philosophy) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The person making a claim has the burden to prove it with evidence
The ball is in your court to provide your burden of proof.
You think it is a coincidence that the universe popped into existence hardwired to produce beings that know and create?
Now go back and write something insightful, dummy.