Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
But uppa here in the Nor'england states, where I live, well, gosh be goner, we had one of them contraptions.
And though I'm a few years older than this woman, I too didn't have a phone in my room @ 14. But, ya know, I wuz a smart cookie, and when mom and dad went outside, or out for the evening, (or even if mom was sitting at her sewing machine) -- and I wanted to have a private conversation, I went to the closet, reached for the 20 foot extension cord, plugged it in, brought it up to my room, laid on the bed, and zappy depappy! I had a phone in my room for the duration of the call.
Then, being the smart youngin' I was, I unplugged the cord, and put the phone back on the knick knack stand in the living room. Amaaaaaaazing, innit?
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
Because he was a REPUBLICAN talking on the phone to a 14-year-old girl. Remember, after they are born, Republicans don't give a shit about them. It's only while they are zygotes and embryos that they defend their lives.
She did not say the phone was on her bedroom, she said she talked to him on the phone in her bedroom. If you recall those days we all had like 30 foot long handset cords so you could walk away from where the phone was jacked to the wall. I didn't have a phone in my bedroom but I talked on the phone a lot while sitting in my bedroom. And I am the same age as this woman.
Not even a good try.
We never had any 30 foot cord on our phone. In those days, most parents wouldn't allow their kids to yak on the phone in their bedrooms where they couldn't hear what was being said. Why would her mother point out that she didn't have a phone if it was still possible that she could use the family phone in her bedroom?
Furthermore:
"She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house."
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
Because he was a REPUBLICAN talking on the phone to a 14-year-old girl. Remember, after they are born, Republicans don't give a shit about them. It's only while they are zygotes and embryos that they defend their lives.
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
Omg in the bedroom and not in the house?Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to decieve:
They say if you want to catch a liar, merely let them talk. In the case of Judge Roy Moore accuser Leigh Corfman, just let her mother talk.
In an interview with Breitbart News, Corfman’s mother Nancy Wells contradicted a key detail of her daughter’s sexual advancement claim against the Alabama GOP Senate candidate. As Breitbart News reporter Aaron Klein noted on Sunday, “Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman – purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone – to arrange at least one encounter.” Breitbart News reports: Citing Corfman, the Postreported: After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
I was responding to YOUR post. You said talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
I said there is no reason a 32 year old man should be talking on the phone with a 14 year old girl... NOTHING good can come from it.
If you have a problem understanding this, just ask yourself, would you want a 32 year old man calling to talk to your 14 year old daughter?
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
I was responding to YOUR post. You said talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
I said there is no reason a 32 year old man should be talking on the phone with a 14 year old girl... NOTHING good can come from it.
If you have a problem understanding this, just ask yourself, would you want a 32 year old man calling to talk to your 14 year old daughter?
Nice witch hunt you've got going. Better call in the Thought Police!
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to decieve:
They say if you want to catch a liar, merely let them talk. In the case of Judge Roy Moore accuser Leigh Corfman, just let her mother talk.
In an interview with Breitbart News, Corfman’s mother Nancy Wells contradicted a key detail of her daughter’s sexual advancement claim against the Alabama GOP Senate candidate. As Breitbart News reporter Aaron Klein noted on Sunday, “Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman – purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone – to arrange at least one encounter.” Breitbart News reports: Citing Corfman, the Postreported: After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.
Breitbart? The Gateway Pundit? Get serious! Stop trying to discredit and slander these victims with fake news!
ROFL!
Liberal Dictionary:
==================
Fake news - truth.
The so-called "victims" are discrediting themselves.
She did not say the phone was on her bedroom, she said she talked to him on the phone in her bedroom. If you recall those days we all had like 30 foot long handset cords so you could walk away from where the phone was jacked to the wall. I didn't have a phone in my bedroom but I talked on the phone a lot while sitting in my bedroom. And I am the same age as this woman.
Not even a good try.
Talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
I was responding to YOUR post. You said talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
I said there is no reason a 32 year old man should be talking on the phone with a 14 year old girl... NOTHING good can come from it.
If you have a problem understanding this, just ask yourself, would you want a 32 year old man calling to talk to your 14 year old daughter?
Nice witch hunt you've got going. Better call in the Thought Police!
No need. YOU said it. I didn't change YOUR words.
Would you be ok with a 32 year old man calling your house to talk to your 14 year old daughter? Simple question.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to decieve:
They say if you want to catch a liar, merely let them talk. In the case of Judge Roy Moore accuser Leigh Corfman, just let her mother talk.
In an interview with Breitbart News, Corfman’s mother Nancy Wells contradicted a key detail of her daughter’s sexual advancement claim against the Alabama GOP Senate candidate. As Breitbart News reporter Aaron Klein noted on Sunday, “Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman – purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone – to arrange at least one encounter.” Breitbart News reports: Citing Corfman, the Postreported: After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.
Lol this is so stupid. Omg, there wasn’t a phone in the room at the time? Obviously Moore is innocent of all charges now!Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to decieve:
They say if you want to catch a liar, merely let them talk. In the case of Judge Roy Moore accuser Leigh Corfman, just let her mother talk.
In an interview with Breitbart News, Corfman’s mother Nancy Wells contradicted a key detail of her daughter’s sexual advancement claim against the Alabama GOP Senate candidate. As Breitbart News reporter Aaron Klein noted on Sunday, “Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman – purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone – to arrange at least one encounter.” Breitbart News reports: Citing Corfman, the Postreported: After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.
Who said molestTalking on the phone is not a sex crime.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.
Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?
All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.
Only a moron could possibly believe that the fact that the accusers claims are technically impossible doesn't exonerate Moore.
Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.
All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.
Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.
Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.
I was responding to YOUR post. You said talking on the phone is not a sex crime.
I said there is no reason a 32 year old man should be talking on the phone with a 14 year old girl... NOTHING good can come from it.
If you have a problem understanding this, just ask yourself, would you want a 32 year old man calling to talk to your 14 year old daughter?
Nice witch hunt you've got going. Better call in the Thought Police!
No need. YOU said it. I didn't change YOUR words.
Would you be ok with a 32 year old man calling your house to talk to your 14 year old daughter? Simple question.
And a bogus one. The burden of proof is on the accusers. You are demanding that the accused prove his innocence. Until actual proof is provided, this is just a political hatchet job.
