BUSTED: Mother of Roy Moore Accuser Contradicts Key Detail of Daughter’s Sexual Advancement Claim

[boedicca]

All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.

Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.

Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

The age of consent in Alabama was 16 years in that era. Personally, I wouldn't have dated a 30 something guy when I was a teenager, but that doesn't make Moore's actions either illegal or immoral.

Again, I'll stand by the concepts of Rule of Law and Due Process, thing which the Left abandoned long ago.

Yeah that's cool and all... except the girl wasn't 16. She was 14. If Moore was a Democrat you'd be calling for him to be castrated and lynched. He's a republican so you instead try to stretch the law to meet his situation, thus proving your dishonesty.

You're neglecting the little detail that nobody has offered any proof that anything untoward occurred.

 

[BULLDOG]

Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.

All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.

Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.

Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

A 30 year old guy dating 18 year olds is not sick.

A 30 year old guy dating high school kids is sick.

 

[ph3iron]

Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to decieve:

BUSTED: Mother of Roy Moore Accuser Contradicts Key Detail of Daughter’s Sexual Advancement Claim​

They say if you want to catch a liar, merely let them talk. In the case of Judge Roy Moore accuser Leigh Corfman, just let her mother talk.

In an interview with Breitbart News, Corfman’s mother Nancy Wells contradicted a key detail of her daughter’s sexual advancement claim against the Alabama GOP Senate candidate. As Breitbart News reporter Aaron Klein noted on Sunday, “Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman – purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone – to arrange at least one encounter.” Breitbart News reports: Citing Corfman, the Postreported: After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.​

They needs to get those nasty heifers from out of this country, and lock up Hillary..

Nothing like living in the present. Such bile.
And how many 911 families and African kids have you helped mr high and mighty?
I guess it's beyond you to look up her achievement?

 

[Aletheia4u]

All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.

Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.

Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

The age of consent in Alabama was 16 years in that era. Personally, I wouldn't have dated a 30 something guy when I was a teenager, but that doesn't make Moore's actions either illegal or immoral.

Again, I'll stand by the concepts of Rule of Law and Due Process, thing which the Left abandoned long ago.

I stand by what's revolting
14 may be illegal, but anyhow, Just sick behavior
Can you imagine a future 32 yr old judge even talking to a teenager?
Nothing to do with what's legal

 

[Lewdog]

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

The age of consent in Alabama was 16 years in that era. Personally, I wouldn't have dated a 30 something guy when I was a teenager, but that doesn't make Moore's actions either illegal or immoral.

Again, I'll stand by the concepts of Rule of Law and Due Process, thing which the Left abandoned long ago.

Yeah that's cool and all... except the girl wasn't 16. She was 14. If Moore was a Democrat you'd be calling for him to be castrated and lynched. He's a republican so you instead try to stretch the law to meet his situation, thus proving your dishonesty.

You're neglecting the little detail that nobody has offered any proof that anything untoward occurred.

You are very flexible, you go from dishonest to dumbass in the same post.

I was responding to YOUR COMMENT.

 

[boedicca]

All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.

Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.

Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

The age of consent in Alabama was 16 years in that era. Personally, I wouldn't have dated a 30 something guy when I was a teenager, but that doesn't make Moore's actions either illegal or immoral.

Again, I'll stand by the concepts of Rule of Law and Due Process, thing which the Left abandoned long ago.

I stand by what's revolting
14 may be illegal, but anyhow, Just sick behavior
Can you imagine a future 32 yr old judge even talking to a teenager?
Nothing to do with what's legal

Perhaps the answer is for 14 year olds to wear burqas and for them to be allowed out of the house only when accompanied by a male relative. And while we're at it, let's sew up their vaginas and remove their clitorii.

 

[ClosedCaption]

the major contradiction that you have in a sexual assault story is a phone location?


Bripat is making it his mission to defending 30 year olds for trying to bang 8th graders.

Is there a NAMBLA for opposite sexes? Or is just known a the Sexual Predater Association?

 

[Lewdog]

Remember this folks. boedicca thinks it is ok for 32 year old men to call 14 year old girls... because talking on the phone isn't a sex crime.

 

[bripat9643]

All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.

Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.

Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

A 30 year old guy dating 18 year olds is not sick.

A 30 year old guy dating high school kids is sick.

We're talking about women aged 18. High school kids are ages 14-18. You keep trying to blur that distinction. It's a sleazy tactic, but everyone is wise to it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She did not say the phone was on her bedroom, she said she talked to him on the phone in her bedroom. If you recall those days we all had like 30 foot long handset cords so you could walk away from where the phone was jacked to the wall. I didn't have a phone in my bedroom but I talked on the phone a lot while sitting in my bedroom. And I am the same age as this woman.

Not even a good try.

We never had any 30 foot cord on our phone. In those days, most parents wouldn't allow their kids to yak on the phone in their bedrooms where they couldn't hear what was being said.

Sorry your parents were that way, but we had a long ass cord that reached half the house, as did everyone I knew.

Ha Ha, we had to stand at the kitchen/Dr phone and could only talk like for 10 mins.

You had a Dr phone? Was your Dad a doctor?

 

[boedicca]

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

The age of consent in Alabama was 16 years in that era. Personally, I wouldn't have dated a 30 something guy when I was a teenager, but that doesn't make Moore's actions either illegal or immoral.

Again, I'll stand by the concepts of Rule of Law and Due Process, thing which the Left abandoned long ago.

Yeah that's cool and all... except the girl wasn't 16. She was 14. If Moore was a Democrat you'd be calling for him to be castrated and lynched. He's a republican so you instead try to stretch the law to meet his situation, thus proving your dishonesty.

You're neglecting the little detail that nobody has offered any proof that anything untoward occurred.

You are very flexible, you go from dishonest to dumbass in the same post.

I was responding to YOUR COMMENT.

And not very effectively at that.

 

[boedicca]

Remember this folks. boedicca thinks it is ok for 32 year old men to call 14 year old girls... because talking on the phone isn't a sex crime.

Remember folks: Lewdog is willing to destroy a man's right to due process in order to score cheap political points.

 

[ph3iron]

All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.

Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.

Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

A 30 year old guy dating 18 year olds is not sick.

A 30 year old guy dating high school kids is sick.

He admitted dating or trying to date teenagers.
That is pathetic, enough to make you throw up.
Not our confederate white boys apparently.
Must be normal behavior there.
Well they do lead the nation in porn viewing
Still, What do we expect from the C grabber/bragger cult?

 

[Lewdog]

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

The age of consent in Alabama was 16 years in that era. Personally, I wouldn't have dated a 30 something guy when I was a teenager, but that doesn't make Moore's actions either illegal or immoral.

Again, I'll stand by the concepts of Rule of Law and Due Process, thing which the Left abandoned long ago.

Yeah that's cool and all... except the girl wasn't 16. She was 14. If Moore was a Democrat you'd be calling for him to be castrated and lynched. He's a republican so you instead try to stretch the law to meet his situation, thus proving your dishonesty.

You're neglecting the little detail that nobody has offered any proof that anything untoward occurred.

You are very flexible, you go from dishonest to dumbass in the same post.

I was responding to YOUR COMMENT.

And not very effectively at that.

Hey, I'm not the one that is either stupid enough or morally bankrupt enough to think it is ok for a 14 year old girl to be at home talking on the phone with a 32 year old man...

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She did not say the phone was on her bedroom, she said she talked to him on the phone in her bedroom. If you recall those days we all had like 30 foot long handset cords so you could walk away from where the phone was jacked to the wall. I didn't have a phone in my bedroom but I talked on the phone a lot while sitting in my bedroom. And I am the same age as this woman.

Not even a good try.

On her phone in her bedroom means the kitchen phone with a long cord.

Well, her bedroom was upstairs and across the house...well over 60feet from the kitchen.

You can’t prove it wrong.

View attachment 160057

Think you had it bad?

Wow! That was high tech compared t0 us. We had two cans and a string, and the string was broken!

 

[BULLDOG]

Why would a 32 year old be talking on the phone with a 14 year old? There is NOTHING good that can come from that.

All you have offered is insinuation and innuendo...exactly what political smear hatchet jobs are intended to do.

Talking on the phone is not sexual assault.

Nor has any actual evidence been put forward. Moore is entitled to due process, but the nature of this creepy accusation 38 years after the supposed incident is not for the truth to come out. The purpose is character assassination in order to remove a political opponent.

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

A RWNJ complaining about unproven claims. How ironic is that?

I know why you're so uptight, you haven't gotten any lately. Perhaps your pal LD will oblige you.


7262 by boedicca on US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Sure do. I've missed you and that thing you do with the ice cubes in your mouth.

 

[boedicca]

To remove a political opponent that molests little girls.

Proof? Where is the evidence that he molested little girls?

All you have is unproven accusations decades after the alleged incident. This is how Totalitarian regimes work, bub.

Please read.
No one said he molested
Just that he admitted a 30 something guy dated teenagers.
Don't you think that's sick??
Hardly the thing senators are made of.
Maybe in the confederacy among high school white boys

A 30 year old guy dating 18 year olds is not sick.

A 30 year old guy dating high school kids is sick.

We're talking about women aged 18. High school kids are ages 14-18. You keep trying to blur that distinction. It's a sleazy tactic, but everyone is wise to it.

I'll note that the Lefties think 14 year olds should be able to have abortions and undergo sex change procedures without their parents' consent, but think that speaking on the phone is Beyond the Pale.

 

[Lewdog]

Remember this folks. boedicca thinks it is ok for 32 year old men to call 14 year old girls... because talking on the phone isn't a sex crime.

Remember folks: Lewdog is willing to destroy a man's right to due process in order to score cheap political points.

I never even referred to Moore... it was in response to YOUR comment that talking on the phone is not a sex crime, but you are too stupid to understand that.

 

[bripat9643]

the major contradiction that you have in a sexual assault story is a phone location?


Bripat is making it his mission to defending 30 year olds for trying to bang 8th graders.

Is there a NAMBLA for opposite sexes? Or is just known a the Sexual Predater Association?

Weak. that would be enough for a "not guilty" verdict in a murder trial. What got O.J. off? the glove that supposedly didn't fit.

 

[Aletheia4u]

Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to decieve:

BUSTED: Mother of Roy Moore Accuser Contradicts Key Detail of Daughter’s Sexual Advancement Claim​

They say if you want to catch a liar, merely let them talk. In the case of Judge Roy Moore accuser Leigh Corfman, just let her mother talk.

In an interview with Breitbart News, Corfman’s mother Nancy Wells contradicted a key detail of her daughter’s sexual advancement claim against the Alabama GOP Senate candidate. As Breitbart News reporter Aaron Klein noted on Sunday, “Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman – purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone – to arrange at least one encounter.” Breitbart News reports: Citing Corfman, the Postreported: After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.​

They needs to get those nasty heifers from out of this country, and lock up Hillary..

Nothing like living in the present. Such bile.
And how many 911 families and African kids have you helped mr high and mighty?
I guess it's beyond you to look up her achievement?

Paying taxes helps out with the needy. But look what we get in return....