C I S A finally admitted that Dominion machines can switch votes from one candidate to another without the voter or auditors ever knowing.

stick-man-beating-a-dead-horse-m01gfkp1knb7r0uw.gif
 
Hmmm? Dems hated machines that could connect to the internet and wanted paper ballots. And this was all the way back in 2019.

The new PAVE Act bans internet, WiFi and cellular connections for voting machines, and gives the Department of Homeland Security the authority to set, for the first time, minimum cybersecurity standards for voting machines, voter registration databases ...

 
Hmmm? Dems hated machines that could connect to the internet and wanted paper ballots. And this was all the way back in 2019.

The new PAVE Act bans internet, WiFi and cellular connections for voting machines, and gives the Department of Homeland Security the authority to set, for the first time, minimum cybersecurity standards for voting machines, voter registration databases ...

Give us the fraud.
Been waitin. :dunno:
 
Hmmm? Dems hated machines that could connect to the internet and wanted paper ballots. And this was all the way back in 2019.

The new PAVE Act bans internet, WiFi and cellular connections for voting machines, and gives the Department of Homeland Security the authority to set, for the first time, minimum cybersecurity standards for voting machines, voter registration databases ...


Yeah, the machines, without internet, mind you, stopped working simultaneously in 5 states then started working simultaneously after a long delay. Ain't big tech wonderful?
 
Dominion Voting Machines as I have posted many times are DESIGNED FOR ELECTION TAMPERING. It is very sad to think that so many aspects of the US government are no longer worthy of trust, but that's where we are.

The whole electoral system, regardless of what method people use to physically vote, is "no longer worthy of trust", but everyone bangs on about voting machines, and wants to keep a shit electoral system that manipulates voting far, FAR worse.
 
The whole electoral system, regardless of what method people use to physically vote, is "no longer worthy of trust", but everyone bangs on about voting machines, and wants to keep a shit electoral system that manipulates voting far, FAR worse.
still better than any other option,,
 
“Conspiracy mongers” will ALWAYS have something to scream about in regard to election security, not only because voting and running elections is done by humans (and criticized mostly by cynical or totally ignorant political partisans), but because the subject is inherently immensely complex — not just technically but administratively.

Not only is our electoral process dependent primarily (even in elections for President) on State authorities and State law, but actual administration and implementation is primarily done at the local county level within states.

State “semi-sovereignty” and county administration of elections has long provided strength & vitality to our nation’s democratic development, but of course has also at times contributed to historical problems that threatened to rip apart the nation.

It is today an under-appreciated part of our “trust in elections” problem and a major reason why simple “legislative solutions” — or even clear lines of regulatory oversight, financial aid, and “best practice” technical measures — are so hard to realize.

Our present elections are nevertheless today better and “more fairly” run by local county election boards than ever. There is by all evidence remarkably little “fraudulent voting” orgoing on today, and less voter intimidation and discrimination in registering … than ever before.

The real problems we have go far deeper than mere “voting” procedures. The hysteria over “voting fraud” is actually a symptom of deeper problems. Can’t go into all that here.

But I’ve done some research into recent Congressional bills attempting to improve “security” and “integrity” of elections. Most proposals, even the bipartisan ones, died in Congress due to the terrible partisan “gridlock.” But what was most obvious to me was that whenever it came down to the level of specifics, all these Congressional proposals necessarily limited themselves to providing funds and “suggestions” for states and counties.
 
Last edited:
Maricopa County already admitted that...




Machines must be replaced because Cyber Ninjas may have programmed them to cheat the other way...

LOL!!
 
The rightwing dark money fake audit in Arizona referred to above by EMH was itself another perfect proof of my point that there will — so long as “Big Lies” are pushed by one candidate — ALWAYS be plenty of lunatics and ultra-partisan hacks screaming fraud where none exists.

EMH doesn’t even mention that the infamous, months-long amateur and irresponsible “Ninja Audit” (paid for by $8 million in Republican dark money) not only ended up finding no fraud that changed the electoral vote in Arizona’s largest county, and no evidence of votes changed by election machinery, but on the contrary found indications that Biden’s victory there was slightly greater than first reported!

Indeed the front company hired by Arizona Republicans itself violated normal security rules in effect to prevent fraud and physical tampering and sabotage of machines. While there can always be improvements, changes, and more security levels added on (for a price) … no system or voting process introduced will ever satisfy utterly irresponsible partisan hacks like those Donald Trump has inspired.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top