Cakes, Fakes & Counter-Quakes; Do The Kleins Have A Countersuit Against The Lesbians?

[badger2]

The xian's ethical stance is a perjury because there is always other others excluded. It is the problematic of the third, a rivalry that concerns "forsaking all others" because it abuts any secret xian avarice from within its protection racket comfort to that of the money-saving stance of the gay couple-to-be. The CIA's rival, the mafia, also had wiretapping capabilities. Future marriages may be much more deceptive and only based on opposing capitalist pricing systems: two hetero boys or two hetero girls.

 

[Silhouette]

sorry, guy, 64% now support gay marriage. The court doesn't do anything the people aren't ready for.

What, in a survey done at a gay bar in San Francisco?

Meanwhile this poll suggests that 85% of people in this USMB blind poll, spread evenly across the entire political spectrum don't support marriage contracts that banish children for life from either a mother or father (gay marriage) Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

 

[Silhouette]

The xian's ethical stance is a perjury because there is always other others excluded. It is the problematic of the third, a rivalry that concerns "forsaking all others" because it abuts any secret xian avarice from within its protection racket comfort to that of the money-saving stance of the gay couple-to-be. The CIA's rival, the mafia, also had wiretapping capabilities. Future marriages may be much more deceptive and only based on opposing capitalist pricing systems: two hetero boys or two hetero girls.

Do you believe polygamists should already be able to marry and adopt legally? Why or why not? Cite Obergefell and the 14th Amendment for extra credit.

 

[badger2]

#293" "Freedom of religion" is not a freedom. It is a coercion, and the founding control-freak psychos knew it.

 

[rightwinger]

sorry, guy, 64% now support gay marriage. The court doesn't do anything the people aren't ready for.

What, in a survey done at a gay bar in San Francisco?

Meanwhile this poll suggests that 85% of people in this USMB blind poll, spread evenly across the entire political spectrum don't support marriage contracts that banish children for life from either a mother or father (gay marriage) Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

LOL

Still trying to sell that line of crap

 

[badger2]

#303 confounds badger2's discourse with polygamy to divert attention away from the concept of the excluded middle. No extra credit should be awarded here.

 

[Silhouette]

#303 confounds badger2's discourse with polygamy to divert attention away from the concept of the excluded middle. No extra credit should be awarded here.

Yeah, or you're afraid to answer the question. "Should polygamists, another sexual lifestyle choice, be legal to marry and adopt right now?" I understand if you're scared to answer.

 

[badger2]

We certainly won't use the 'quote' function for post #302 either, because it does a meth pimp imitation by swiftly adding children while attaching the child to the concept of the xian mafia's buy-sell-trade 666 kuklos exothen: 'banished for life.' This is why post #303 then attempted to mystify after the first deception, like an addict on religious opiates.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

We certainly won't use the 'quote' function for post #302 either, because it does a meth pimp imitation by swiftly adding children while attaching the child to the concept of the xian mafia's buy-sell-trade 666 kuklos exothen: 'banished for life.' This is why post #303 then attempted to mystify after the first deception, like an addict on religious opiates.

You're just blabbering to blabber. Answer the damn question or admit you can't

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

It's really a bad idea to eat a cake that you forced someone to bake

Right. Because clearly these Christians would want to go to jail for messing with it.

The question begs, why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Unless of course there is an agenda. But nah the gays would never have an agenda...

good point.

Why would these folks INSIST that Woolworth's serve them?

Why, why, why, they must have an agenda!!!!

Hey, everyone gets it.
Left Wingers loath Christians, and they want to violate their 1st amendment rights.
why Why WHY must the dumb liberal bigots be taught about constitutional rights over and over again.
A reasonable person would respect a Baker's faith and just choose another baker.
But, a hate filled left wing bigot would try to destroy the Baker's livelihood.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's really a bad idea to eat a cake that you forced someone to bake

Right. Because clearly these Christians would want to go to jail for messing with it.

The question begs, why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Unless of course there is an agenda. But nah the gays would never have an agenda...

good point.

Why would these folks INSIST that Woolworth's serve them?

Why, why, why, they must have an agenda!!!!

Hey, everyone gets it.
Left Wingers loath Christians, and they want to violate their 1st amendment rights.
why Why WHY must the dumb liberal bigots be taught about constitutional rights over and over again.
A reasonable person would respect a Baker's faith and just choose another baker.
But, a hate filled left wing bigot would try to destroy the Baker's livelihood.

Because jackass leftists are not happy unless they are bitching or not getting their way. Petulant little children

 

[Silhouette]

We certainly won't use the 'quote' function for post #302 either, because it does a meth pimp imitation by swiftly adding children while attaching the child to the concept of the xian mafia's buy-sell-trade 666 kuklos exothen: 'banished for life.' This is why post #303 then attempted to mystify after the first deception, like an addict on religious opiates.

Still can't answer the question about why polygamists can't marry and adopt kids, even though Obergefell said that deviant sex practitioners can marry. I get it. You're afraid.

 

[JoeMoma]

If the majority support gay marriage, then it shouldn't be a problem for the gay couple to find a cake maker to make them a wedding cake. It isn't wise to force a business to do the job. The quality of the work will most probably suffer.

Again, so those blacks in Montegomery should just go around from lunch counter to lunch counter until they'll find someone to serve them, then?

Bullshit.

You have a business, you should provide that service to anyone who can pay for it.

I guess I can't get why anyone would turn down good money like that. I really, really don't. The only reason I turn down a customer is if I think I won't get paid.

You ignored the part about "If the majority support gay marriage" It probably is difficult to find a bakery that would turn down business to do a cake for a same sex wedding. That being the case, why would you want to risk low quality service by forcing the small minority of businesses that don't want the job to do the job.

 

[Silhouette]

why would you want to risk low quality service by forcing the small minority of businesses that don't want the job to do the job.

The lesbians did choose to force them though, forcing them to choose between their 1st Amendment protections & staying in business at the promise of eternal damnation of their immortal soul. The lesbians and the State of Oregon are in deep snow here.

 

[JoeMoma]

why would you want to risk low quality service by forcing the small minority of businesses that don't want the job to do the job.

The lesbians did choose to force them though, forcing them to choose between their 1st Amendment protections & staying in business at the promise of eternal damnation of their immortal soul. The lesbians and the State of Oregon are in deep snow here.

Are you a pharisee?

 

[Silhouette]

Are you a pharisee?

No, I'm not an ancient Jew. The commandment in Jude 1 (of the New Testament of Jesus Christ, as told by his close daily personal servant Jude) is as strict as one can be. "Thou shalt not!" is the entire message of that passage. Christians are allowed (and encouraged) to reach out to individual sinners "making a difference". But they are in no way shape or form to participate in the usurping of an entire culture by a deviant sex cult using vehicles such as adoption, marriage or education. Ist Verboten under promise of eternal peril and blackness. So you can see why the Kleins had to..*ahem* de-Klein baking the cake for a "gay wedding"...whatever that is.

 

[JoeMoma]

Are you a pharisee?

No, I'm not an ancient Jew. The commandment in Jude 1 (of the New Testament of Jesus Christ, as told by his close daily personal servant Jude) is as strict as one can be. "Thou shalt not!" is the entire message of that passage. Christians are allowed (and encouraged) to reach out to individual sinners "making a difference". But they are in no way shape or form to participate in the usurping of an entire culture by a deviant sex cult using vehicles such as adoption, marriage or education. Ist Verboten under promise of eternal peril and blackness. So you can see why the Kleins had to..*ahem* de-Klein baking the cake for a "gay wedding"...whatever that is.

I disagree with your interpretation of Jude 1. But it's okay to disagree.
Ephesians 2:8-9

 

[Silhouette]

I disagree with your interpretation of Jude 1. But it's okay to disagree.
Ephesians 2:8-9

Well if you need clarification for emphasis, read Romans 1 when you get a minute...

 

[JoeB131]

What, in a survey done at a gay bar in San Francisco?

Meanwhile this poll suggests that 85% of people in this USMB blind poll, spread evenly across the entire political spectrum don't support marriage contracts that banish children for life from either a mother or father (gay marriage)

Guy, a poll on a right wing site doesn't count for anything.

I'm sure that if we were going to do a poll in a gay bar in San Francisco, we'd get you to conduct it when you are on the "Down-low".

 

[JoeB131]

Hey, everyone gets it.
Left Wingers loath Christians, and they want to violate their 1st amendment rights.
why Why WHY must the dumb liberal bigots be taught about constitutional rights over and over again.
A reasonable person would respect a Baker's faith and just choose another baker.
But, a hate filled left wing bigot would try to destroy the Baker's livelihood.

again, why did those uppity black people insist on sitting at the counter, buddy?

If the Christians are so determined not to participate in a gay wedding, they can go find something else to do for a living. It's pretty simple.