Cakes, Fakes & Counter-Quakes; Do The Kleins Have A Countersuit Against The Lesbians?

[Mac1958]

Justice Kennedy Grills Baker In Colorado Same-Sex Rights Case | HuffPost

Justice Kennedy today: “Tolerance is essential in a free society. Tolerance is most meaningful when it’s mutual,” Kennedy said.

And, bingo. The wingers won't agree with that, of course.
.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Justice Kennedy Grills Baker In Colorado Same-Sex Rights Case | HuffPost

Justice Kennedy today: “Tolerance is essential in a free society. Tolerance is most meaningful when it’s mutual,” Kennedy said.

And, bingo. The wingers won't agree with that, of course.
.

Tolerance has limits, religious convictions and beliefs can certainly push those limits.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

It's really a bad idea to eat a cake that you forced someone to bake

 

[Peach]

No one says the bakers do not have a right to believe in their religion.

What they cannot do in public accommodation is commit an act that violates the law.

Yes, certain religious acts can be regulated by law.

You can symbolically eat the body of God, but you cannot sacrifice a human and eat his flesh in a religious act.

No religious right exists that permits a bake to refuse to serve to gays his product that is offered to the whole.

Exactly, the baker chose to open a public business, and wants it "privatized" with public benefits. No.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No one says the bakers do not have a right to believe in their religion.

What they cannot do in public accommodation is commit an act that violates the law.

Yes, certain religious acts can be regulated by law.

You can symbolically eat the body of God, but you cannot sacrifice a human and eat his flesh in a religious act.

No religious right exists that permits a bake to refuse to serve to gays his product that is offered to the whole.

Exactly, the baker chose to open a public business, and wants it "privatized" with public benefits. No.

The question begs, why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Unless of course there is an agenda. But nah the gays would never have an agenda...

<insert hysterical laughter>

 

[Syriusly]

No one says the bakers do not have a right to believe in their religion.

What they cannot do in public accommodation is commit an act that violates the law.

Yes, certain religious acts can be regulated by law.

You can symbolically eat the body of God, but you cannot sacrifice a human and eat his flesh in a religious act.

No religious right exists that permits a bake to refuse to serve to gays his product that is offered to the whole.

Exactly, the baker chose to open a public business, and wants it "privatized" with public benefits. No.

The question begs, why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Looking Back on the Fight for Equal Access to Public Accommodations

Yes- why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Why would anyone pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No one says the bakers do not have a right to believe in their religion.

What they cannot do in public accommodation is commit an act that violates the law.

Yes, certain religious acts can be regulated by law.

You can symbolically eat the body of God, but you cannot sacrifice a human and eat his flesh in a religious act.

No religious right exists that permits a bake to refuse to serve to gays his product that is offered to the whole.

Exactly, the baker chose to open a public business, and wants it "privatized" with public benefits. No.

The question begs, why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Looking Back on the Fight for Equal Access to Public Accommodations

Yes- why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Why would anyone pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

You again? Zzzzzz

 

[Peach]

No one says the bakers do not have a right to believe in their religion.

What they cannot do in public accommodation is commit an act that violates the law.

Yes, certain religious acts can be regulated by law.

You can symbolically eat the body of God, but you cannot sacrifice a human and eat his flesh in a religious act.

No religious right exists that permits a bake to refuse to serve to gays his product that is offered to the whole.

Exactly, the baker chose to open a public business, and wants it "privatized" with public benefits. No.

The question begs, why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Looking Back on the Fight for Equal Access to Public Accommodations

Yes- why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Why would anyone pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

Because our nation requires these laws. We are the best of the best in this world, you can try to hold us back, but we will go forward.

 

[Syriusly]

No one says the bakers do not have a right to believe in their religion.

What they cannot do in public accommodation is commit an act that violates the law.

Yes, certain religious acts can be regulated by law.

You can symbolically eat the body of God, but you cannot sacrifice a human and eat his flesh in a religious act.

No religious right exists that permits a bake to refuse to serve to gays his product that is offered to the whole.

Exactly, the baker chose to open a public business, and wants it "privatized" with public benefits. No.

The question begs, why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Looking Back on the Fight for Equal Access to Public Accommodations

Yes- why would anyone force someone to conduct business?

Why would anyone pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

You again? Zzzzzz

Contards as always are fact adverse.

 

[badger2]

It's a bad idea to sell cakes in a free enterprise system susceptible to boycott.

 

[badger2]

Nevertheless, the victim of religious protection-racketism can be starved out as a social exile, the christian mafia's protection racketism psychically consumes the scapegoat as a victim of its 666 bulemia: luklos exothen. Sutherland,Springs, Texas is a recent example.

 

[badger2]

should read "kuklos exothen."

 

[badger2]

We have seen the signs in street protests in Bloomington, Indiana: "God hates gays." We can understand the feeling in the pit of the stomach of the baker, because his own religion has seriously molested him by causing his women to think of themselves as male homosexuals. He is forced to confront this deception especially when homosexuals walk into the store, at which point he has a convenient scapegoat upon which too project his schizoid, Janus-faced rage. In silent desperation, he is doubly mad because he knows that his women can professionally taunt him with the theologian's art of deception at any time, which is religion's built-in Oedipal antagonism: girls don't have to deal all that intensely with the Electra Complex.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

We have seen the signs in street protests in Bloomington, Indiana: "God hates gays." We can understand the feeling in the pit of the stomach of the baker, because his own religion has seriously molested him by causing his women to think of themselves as male homosexuals. He is forced to confront this deception especially when homosexuals walk into the store, at which point he has a convenient scapegoat upon which too project his schizoid, Janus-faced rage. In silent desperation, he is doubly mad because he knows that his women can professionally taunt him with the theologian's art of deception at any time, which is religion's built-in Oedipal antagonism: girls don't have to deal all that intensely with the Electra Complex.

What the hell was that nonsense?

 

[badger2]

#274: Are you afraid to take it one sentence at a time, because you know you will be crucified with information anarchy in front of the people (who will then laugh behind your back) if you do?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

#274: Are you afraid to take it one sentence at a time, because you know you will be crucified with information anarchy in front of the people (who will then laugh behind your back) if you do?

Who are you talking too. There is a quote function ya know

 

[JoeMoma]

To me the case of bakery/Baker of Christian faith vs. right of same sex couple to get a wedding cake is a simple common sense issue. If the wedding cake being ordered for the same sex wedding is indistinguishable form a cake for a heterosexual wedding, then the baker should have to make the cake. On the other hand, if the decorating/artistry of the wedding cake is not indistinguishable from a wedding cake for a heterosexual wedding, then the baker should be able to deny the order to make that cake because of freedom of speech and freedom of religion and because it’s not on the menu of the type of cakes made by the baker.

If neutral person can tell that the cake is for a same sex wedding just by looking at the cake, then the baker should be able to turn down the job of making the cake.

That fact is, the baker does not need to know who is getting married to bake a wedding cake. So making the cake, if it looks like any other wedding cake, should not be considered an endorsement of same sex weddings.

 

[badger2]

#276 is a fascist entity. That is why the questioning of typos as the eye scans the horizon looking for guilt, translates to the 'quote' function. When did S. start thinking it was time to lay a 'quote' on the corksucking cake? S. does not have the stones to take it one sentence at a time.

 

[badger2]

#277: Every cake is always already a different cake. Thus, the fascism of refusal is in the baker's head: buy-sell-trade 666 kuklos exothen comes from the Book of Revelation, the mark of the beast John of Patmos had serious problems with, while over yonder on Lesbos, Sappho and the girls are having a ball, because they never had that much trouble with their Electra Complex in the same way and with the intensity of John's Oedipus.

 

[badger2]

'But I would never say what I write.'
(Gilles Deleuze)

Next time, have them order a speaking phallus drawn on the corksucking cake.