- Thread starter
- #221
Pass a law that forces gun manufacturers to make guns that cannot hit the broad side of a barn.
Problem solved.
Problem solved.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did not see where she was involuntarily committed, but you could be right. My guess is she tried to committ suicide, and was observed until she wouldn't harm herself (there are few other precedents).
Interesting how a photographer happened to be outside the house when the cops aarrived. I doubt it was a coincidence. If I was some rabid pro-gun advocate, I wonder if I might threaten suicide, then get out in time to call the press?
Regardless of whether or not the story was manufactured, or accusations are fabricated, I feel quite comfortable with this confiscation, and disagree that, as stated in the OP, this will lead to some sort of slippery slope. We're still a long way from adding an amendment to the Constitution.
I'm sure the photographer was there at the behest of the Stasi. I imagine if the victim had known they were coming, they would have been scarce.
2 days and they both lose a Constitutional right.
And the left cheers.
I didn't need further proof that liberals and progs hate the Constitution, but I got more anyway
I call it a reasonable precaution.
I've told this story before, but it bears repeating.
A couple years back, I had a next door neighbor. Kind of a bum. Had some serious medical issues and he was on disability. Well, one day, a bullet shattered his patio door. When the cops came, he tried to claim someone shot in at him. (Quickly dismissed by the fact the glass was outside and there were no bullet holes in the walls inside.)
Well, the sensible thing for the cops to do at that point would have been to confiscate his gun. Nope. No deal there. They let him keep it.
A few weeks later, he killed himself with that gun.
The moral is some people are too stupid to own one.
What's to stop him from overdosing or driving his car into someone?
You can't screw the rational by attempting to protect the irrational.
And what court determined they had each lost that right?
curiously, you left out the qualifier "involuntarily"![]()
really
what about due process
just throw it out the window
Why are rightwingers always on the side of the bad guys?
THAT I believe.
You all are the "no problem" brigade. People are shooting dozens of little first-graders? Oh, no problem! you say.
That would be an amazing precedent since the police have rarely benefited from the presence of independent photographers during apprehensions.
2 days and they both lose a Constitutional right.
And the left cheers.
I didn't need further proof that liberals and progs hate the Constitution, but I got more anyway
I call it a reasonable precaution.
I've told this story before, but it bears repeating.
A couple years back, I had a next door neighbor. Kind of a bum. Had some serious medical issues and he was on disability. Well, one day, a bullet shattered his patio door. When the cops came, he tried to claim someone shot in at him. (Quickly dismissed by the fact the glass was outside and there were no bullet holes in the walls inside.)
Well, the sensible thing for the cops to do at that point would have been to confiscate his gun. Nope. No deal there. They let him keep it.
A few weeks later, he killed himself with that gun.
actually they should have arrested him for discharging his firearm2 days and they both lose a Constitutional right.
And the left cheers.
I didn't need further proof that liberals and progs hate the Constitution, but I got more anyway
I call it a reasonable precaution.
I've told this story before, but it bears repeating.
A couple years back, I had a next door neighbor. Kind of a bum. Had some serious medical issues and he was on disability. Well, one day, a bullet shattered his patio door. When the cops came, he tried to claim someone shot in at him. (Quickly dismissed by the fact the glass was outside and there were no bullet holes in the walls inside.)
Well, the sensible thing for the cops to do at that point would have been to confiscate his gun. Nope. No deal there. They let him keep it.
A few weeks later, he killed himself with that gun.
Why are rightwingers always on the side of the bad guys?
The spectacularly bad guys.
You all were wildly in favor of the torturers; you were enthusiastic supporters of Herman Cain with his feeling up of every white woman who interviewed with him for a job; now you want certified crazy people to keep their guns!
All this while a crazy man in upper New York State has gone on YET ANOTHER of these shooting rampages we see so many of, shot 6, killed 4, is holed up in an abandoned bar surrounded by police, and he's shooting at them.
Do all gun collectors want crazy people to have guns? Is this the new sliced bread?
John Edwards cheated on his dying wife and even had a child.Why are rightwingers always on the side of the bad guys?
The spectacularly bad guys.
You all were wildly in favor of the torturers; you were enthusiastic supporters of Herman Cain with his feeling up of every white woman who interviewed with him for a job; now you want certified crazy people to keep their guns!
All this while a crazy man in upper New York State has gone on YET ANOTHER of these shooting rampages we see so many of, shot 6, killed 4, is holed up in an abandoned bar surrounded by police, and he's shooting at them.
Do all gun collectors want crazy people to have guns? Is this the new sliced bread?
uhm, you guys are quoting Nixon and copying hitler, and doing everything you can to kill the Constitution and remove freedoms from law abiding Americans.
And what's "spectacular" about Cain and 2 cases of harassment?
and before you make it clear that you are a hypocrite; Clinton
[
sad story
bullets rarely break a window
they usually zip through
the way the cone shape hole in the glass
indicates the direction of the bullet
maybe the cops didnt see how crazy he was and did not make a referral to the mental health folks
for a follow up
what as a good neighbor did you do to help this guy
[
Don't see a problem there. Should have offed himself first and saved the hassle of a new patio door.
2 days and they both lose a Constitutional right.
And the left cheers.
I didn't need further proof that liberals and progs hate the Constitution, but I got more anyway
I call it a reasonable precaution.
I've told this story before, but it bears repeating.
A couple years back, I had a next door neighbor. Kind of a bum. Had some serious medical issues and he was on disability. Well, one day, a bullet shattered his patio door. When the cops came, he tried to claim someone shot in at him. (Quickly dismissed by the fact the glass was outside and there were no bullet holes in the walls inside.)
Well, the sensible thing for the cops to do at that point would have been to confiscate his gun. Nope. No deal there. They let him keep it.
A few weeks later, he killed himself with that gun.
The moral is some people are too stupid to own one.
What's to stop him from overdosing or driving his car into someone?
You can't screw the rational by attempting to protect the irrational.
That would be an amazing precedent since the police have rarely benefited from the presence of independent photographers during apprehensions.
There was nothing independent about the photographer, he was there to document the "Brave and Noble" Stasi as they kept the peasants in line.
I call it a reasonable precaution.
I've told this story before, but it bears repeating.
A couple years back, I had a next door neighbor. Kind of a bum. Had some serious medical issues and he was on disability. Well, one day, a bullet shattered his patio door. When the cops came, he tried to claim someone shot in at him. (Quickly dismissed by the fact the glass was outside and there were no bullet holes in the walls inside.)
Well, the sensible thing for the cops to do at that point would have been to confiscate his gun. Nope. No deal there. They let him keep it.
A few weeks later, he killed himself with that gun.
The moral is some people are too stupid to own one.
What's to stop him from overdosing or driving his car into someone?
You can't screw the rational by attempting to protect the irrational.
The only thing I see as "irrational" is you wanting to own a killing device you have no real need for.
The moral is some people are too stupid to own one.
What's to stop him from overdosing or driving his car into someone?
You can't screw the rational by attempting to protect the irrational.
The only thing I see as "irrational" is you wanting to own a killing device you have no real need for.
Killing device????
You mean the scissors the abortion doctor uses to sever spines????
Really, you have no need for it because you think the cops will always come to save your ass on time before you're dead, but I like to be able to rely on my own ability to stop an attack without any help.