Can Anyone Stop Hillary?

[Rehmani]

No one can stop Hilary.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

True dat, never won a competitive election...


Can Anyone Stop Hillary? Why Not? Hillary has Never Won a Competitive Election

January 17, 2014 by Daniel Greenfield

Can anyone stop Hillary, Time asks? Why not.

Forgotten in the reality distortion field surrounding Ready for Hillary is the simply fact that Hillary has never actually won a competitive election. Hillary’s senate seat in New York was handed to her after Giuliani came down with cancer. If he hadn’t gotten sick, Hillary Clinton would have tried to be the senator from her native Illinois instead and might have prevented Obama from ever getting started.

Hillary Clinton was so incredibly popular that her otherwise unknown Democratic primary opponent in 2000 managed to take a fifth of the vote.

...

The only ticket she’s running on is “First female president.” If the Republicans were to put up a female candidate, Hillary would literally have no platform, no slogan, no anything.

Take away the “It’s time for little girls to have a role model” and “It’s time to show a wife and a mother can run the country” spiel and there is nothing in the Hillary box. Zero.

Can anyone stop Hillary? Anyone can stop Hillary.

Can Anyone Stop Hillary? Why Not? Hillary has Never Won a Competitive Election | FrontPage Magazine

She's her own worst enemy. If she sticks to wanting Syrian refugees brought her, she loses. Even hardcore Democrats aren't going to vote party lines for something suicidal. May not vote for a Republican and just stay home, but they're not gonna vote for anyone proposing such a thing.

GOP can seal this up this week by projecting strength and confidence and common-sense.

 

[Interpol]

If somebody comes up with a message that can attract enough moderate voters, the GOP nominee will have at least an equal shot of beating Hillary.

Only problem is, Republicans have been making a habit of turning off moderates in presidential election years, winning the popular vote just once in the last 6 tries. If Republicans don't budge on immigration reform or doing concrete things to help alleviate income inequality, which affects all working class voters no matter their party affiliation.

If they want to win they need to grow their tent. They can do it, but their default setting has been to turn moderates away. If they can fix that, they'll win again.

 

[my2¢]

If Republicans nominate somebody that's won a competitive election she'll go down in defeat. Otherwise I'd hedge my bets.

 

[oreo]

True dat, never won a competitive election...


Can Anyone Stop Hillary? Why Not? Hillary has Never Won a Competitive Election

January 17, 2014 by Daniel Greenfield

Can anyone stop Hillary, Time asks? Why not.

Forgotten in the reality distortion field surrounding Ready for Hillary is the simply fact that Hillary has never actually won a competitive election. Hillary’s senate seat in New York was handed to her after Giuliani came down with cancer. If he hadn’t gotten sick, Hillary Clinton would have tried to be the senator from her native Illinois instead and might have prevented Obama from ever getting started.

Hillary Clinton was so incredibly popular that her otherwise unknown Democratic primary opponent in 2000 managed to take a fifth of the vote.

...

The only ticket she’s running on is “First female president.” If the Republicans were to put up a female candidate, Hillary would literally have no platform, no slogan, no anything.

Take away the “It’s time for little girls to have a role model” and “It’s time to show a wife and a mother can run the country” spiel and there is nothing in the Hillary box. Zero.

Can anyone stop Hillary? Anyone can stop Hillary.

Can Anyone Stop Hillary? Why Not? Hillary has Never Won a Competitive Election | FrontPage Magazine

Hillary Clinton is going into this race with a 6 to 10 lead as the 1st woman POTUS in 200 YEARS. Women are the majority voters at 54%--they outvote men by 10 points. It's like starting a Super Bowl Game with the other side having a 3 touchdown lead before the 1st kickoff.

Clearly the ONLY candidate that could level out the playing field would be Carly Fiorina. She could also wipe Hillary Clinton out in any debate just on substance alone.

BUT The far right of the Republican party has done their job again by chasing off 17% of the population, Hispanics--due to their support of Trump who is now polling at an Historic NEGATIVE 75% within this group. In 2012 Republicans lost women by double digits and younger women by 36 points, securing a 2nd term for Obama.
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump

Typically the GOP nominee since Reagan has to capture at least 40% of this group to win the White House. G.W. Bush got 44%, and Romney lost because he only captured 27%.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study

So even if it is Carly Fiorina--she would have to figure out a way to bring Latino's back, by picking a VP that was very popular with Hispanics--& and that isn't-(Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz) whom they don't like.
Hispanic Vote Won't Come Easy for Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz

Republicans are the minority party at 41 million, Democrats are stronger at 46 million, and Independents are the largest party today, representing 40% of the electorate.

So the MATH reflects a real uphill battle for Republicans to get to the White House in 2016.

Other than that I don't think any GOP male candidate is going to stand up against this Tsunami to put the 1st woman in the oval office.

 

[Rehmani]

If somebody comes up with a message that can attract enough moderate voters, the GOP nominee will have at least an equal shot of beating Hillary.

Only problem is, Republicans have been making a habit of turning off moderates in presidential election years, winning the popular vote just once in the last 6 tries. If Republicans don't budge on immigration reform or doing concrete things to help alleviate income inequality, which affects all working class voters no matter their party affiliation.

If they want to win they need to grow their tent. They can do it, but their default setting has been to turn moderates away. If they can fix that, they'll win again.

But still Mrs.Clinton is strong.

 

[American_Jihad]

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism
Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?
November 19, 2015
Daniel Greenfield

That would come as news to the Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram and the few hundred other Muslim terror organizations around the world. And to all the Muslim Supremacists quoting the Koran, shouting "Allah Akbar" and killing non-Muslims in the name of Islam.

But according to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. Not a thing. Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?

After the Paris terror attacks, a lot of candidates are releasing their plans for defeating ISIS. Most of them are the same combination of intensifying air strikes, more special forces and regime change in Syria.

Not to be left out of the ISIS party, Hillary Clinton came with her own identical plan. There are some reasonable things about it, mainly she promises to undo Obama's pandering to Iran and its Shiite puppets and back a second Sunni Awakening.

But instead of talking about Islamic terrorism, she talks about "radical Jihadism" (is there a moderate Jihadism?) while insisting that Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. At the debate, she refused to even say the words, "radical Islam". Now she's moving even further into denial.

Let’s be clear, though, Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people, and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.

Not a thing. Ignore all the Muslim terror groups.

"The obsession in some quarters with a clash of civilization, or repeating the specific words radical Islamic terrorism isn’t just a distraction, it gives these criminals, these murderers more standing than they deserve."

Repeating what Muslim terrorists say is a...

...

According to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism.

So who is responsible for the Islamic terrorism if it isn't Muslims? Buddhists fighting for ISIS? Those Amish suicide bombers? Are the Presbyterians blowing themselves up to create an Islamic State?

Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism. Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with the truth.

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism

 

[Rehmani]

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism
Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?
November 19, 2015
Daniel Greenfield

That would come as news to the Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram and the few hundred other Muslim terror organizations around the world. And to all the Muslim Supremacists quoting the Koran, shouting "Allah Akbar" and killing non-Muslims in the name of Islam.

But according to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. Not a thing. Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?

After the Paris terror attacks, a lot of candidates are releasing their plans for defeating ISIS. Most of them are the same combination of intensifying air strikes, more special forces and regime change in Syria.

Not to be left out of the ISIS party, Hillary Clinton came with her own identical plan. There are some reasonable things about it, mainly she promises to undo Obama's pandering to Iran and its Shiite puppets and back a second Sunni Awakening.

But instead of talking about Islamic terrorism, she talks about "radical Jihadism" (is there a moderate Jihadism?) while insisting that Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. At the debate, she refused to even say the words, "radical Islam". Now she's moving even further into denial.

Let’s be clear, though, Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people, and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.

Not a thing. Ignore all the Muslim terror groups.

"The obsession in some quarters with a clash of civilization, or repeating the specific words radical Islamic terrorism isn’t just a distraction, it gives these criminals, these murderers more standing than they deserve."

Repeating what Muslim terrorists say is a...

...

According to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism.

So who is responsible for the Islamic terrorism if it isn't Muslims? Buddhists fighting for ISIS? Those Amish suicide bombers? Are the Presbyterians blowing themselves up to create an Islamic State?

Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism. Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with the truth.

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism

She is right, could be un seen forces. For example over 100 million missing jew or under cover. Just before the Paris incident European Parliament pass a bill against Israeli products that any product come from Illegal settlement in Israel will be marked with yellow label.

 

[the_human_being]

Obama just keeps on giving. He really must hate the Clintons. He's hell bent on handing the election to Donald Trump:

Obama takes immigration leniency plan to the Supreme Court

 

[the_human_being]

The real unemployment rate under the Obama Administration according to the number 2 contender in the Democrat race for President. Thank you Obama. You're the gift that keeps on giving. The Republican Party accepts your gift of the office of President. We couldn't have done it without you.

Bernie Sanders agrees with conservatives: The Obama admin. unemployment numbers are totally phony

 

[American_Jihad]

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism
Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?
November 19, 2015
Daniel Greenfield

That would come as news to the Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram and the few hundred other Muslim terror organizations around the world. And to all the Muslim Supremacists quoting the Koran, shouting "Allah Akbar" and killing non-Muslims in the name of Islam.

But according to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. Not a thing. Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?

After the Paris terror attacks, a lot of candidates are releasing their plans for defeating ISIS. Most of them are the same combination of intensifying air strikes, more special forces and regime change in Syria.

Not to be left out of the ISIS party, Hillary Clinton came with her own identical plan. There are some reasonable things about it, mainly she promises to undo Obama's pandering to Iran and its Shiite puppets and back a second Sunni Awakening.

But instead of talking about Islamic terrorism, she talks about "radical Jihadism" (is there a moderate Jihadism?) while insisting that Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. At the debate, she refused to even say the words, "radical Islam". Now she's moving even further into denial.

Let’s be clear, though, Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people, and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.

Not a thing. Ignore all the Muslim terror groups.

"The obsession in some quarters with a clash of civilization, or repeating the specific words radical Islamic terrorism isn’t just a distraction, it gives these criminals, these murderers more standing than they deserve."

Repeating what Muslim terrorists say is a...

...

According to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism.

So who is responsible for the Islamic terrorism if it isn't Muslims? Buddhists fighting for ISIS? Those Amish suicide bombers? Are the Presbyterians blowing themselves up to create an Islamic State?

Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism. Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with the truth.

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism

She is right, could be un seen forces. For example over 100 million missing jew or under cover. Just before the Paris incident European Parliament pass a bill against Israeli products that any product come from Illegal settlement in Israel will be marked with yellow label.

Why don't you start a thread in Conspiracy Theories...

 

[American_Jihad]

Hillary Clinton: Trump is Wrong, Libya Will Work Out
I get a laugh just saying it…
November 20, 2015
Daniel Greenfield

The fallback argument of the Arab Springers is, "Eventually you'll see we were right." There's no time frame for this "eventually." It might come in ten years or ten thousand.

So when asked about the mess she made at CFR, Hillary Clinton said a country, parts of which are controlled by ISIS because of her illegal war, will work out great. Sooner or later.

...

In response Hillary Clinton trots out the historical inevitability claim. It's an idea that no one takes seriously anymore. The Arab Spring happened, in part, as a result of specific actions by Obama and Hillary Clinton. It wasn't historically inevitable. It was the Muslim Brotherhood trying to take over countries with Hillary's backing.

Furthermore, Hillary personally pushed for an illegal war in Libya precisely because the Jihadists weren't getting it done on their own. So much for historical inevitability.

Then she doubles down on the same nonsense, the fake elections, which were neither free nor fair, in Libya. The dismissal of the battles between the Islamist militias and what's left of Libya's military as "disruptions" as if having Libya's capital in the hands of terror groups, ISIS taking entire cities, is a mere "disruption" and it's all "too soon to tell."

When we can we tell? Ten thousand years from now.

Hillary Clinton: Trump is Wrong, Libya Will Work Out

 

[Sarah G]

I must admit someone might stop Hillary. Maybe Bernie.

 

[Rehmani]

I think Mr.Obama and democrats know what they are doing and so is Mrs.Clinton. These immigrants who are providing services to American more than 10 years and some of them 20 years deserve some respects,rights,benefits and peace in their life. They are the one who can lift American economy too.

 

[Rehmani]

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism
Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?
November 19, 2015
Daniel Greenfield

That would come as news to the Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram and the few hundred other Muslim terror organizations around the world. And to all the Muslim Supremacists quoting the Koran, shouting "Allah Akbar" and killing non-Muslims in the name of Islam.

But according to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. Not a thing. Whom are you going to believe, Hillary Clinton or reality?

After the Paris terror attacks, a lot of candidates are releasing their plans for defeating ISIS. Most of them are the same combination of intensifying air strikes, more special forces and regime change in Syria.

Not to be left out of the ISIS party, Hillary Clinton came with her own identical plan. There are some reasonable things about it, mainly she promises to undo Obama's pandering to Iran and its Shiite puppets and back a second Sunni Awakening.

But instead of talking about Islamic terrorism, she talks about "radical Jihadism" (is there a moderate Jihadism?) while insisting that Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. At the debate, she refused to even say the words, "radical Islam". Now she's moving even further into denial.

Let’s be clear, though, Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people, and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.

Not a thing. Ignore all the Muslim terror groups.

"The obsession in some quarters with a clash of civilization, or repeating the specific words radical Islamic terrorism isn’t just a distraction, it gives these criminals, these murderers more standing than they deserve."

Repeating what Muslim terrorists say is a...

...

According to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism.

So who is responsible for the Islamic terrorism if it isn't Muslims? Buddhists fighting for ISIS? Those Amish suicide bombers? Are the Presbyterians blowing themselves up to create an Islamic State?

Muslims have nothing to do with Islamic terrorism. Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with the truth.

Hillary Clinton: Muslims Have Nothing To Do With Islamic Terrorism

She is right, could be un seen forces. For example over 100 million missing jew or under cover. Just before the Paris incident European Parliament pass a bill against Israeli products that any product come from Illegal settlement in Israel will be marked with yellow label.

Why don't you start a thread in Conspiracy Theories...

Similarly Charlie Abdou incident occur in Paris just after israeli terrorism in Gaza and killed 2000 innocent empty handed people, mostly women and children. And that terror act by Israel in Gaza, destroyed Israeli image badly in Europe. It could be link with Israel too, as we saw Israeli prime minister rush to front row in peace walk in last moment, don't you think it make sense.

 

[the_human_being]

 

[American_Jihad]

Here's How Pathetic Hillary Clinton Defenders Have Become
That's how Hillary spin sausage gets made
November 20, 2015
Daniel Greenfield

You've probably heard this story about the Laugh Factory and Hillary Clinton.

According to Judicial Watch, Laugh Factory, a comedy club with locations across the country, posted footage of a comedian taking jabs at the Monica Lewinsky scandal, her attire and also alluded to questions about her sexual orientation. The club’s owner Jamie Masada told the legal focused news site that the Clinton’s campaign has demanded the video be taken down.

“They threatened me,” Masada told Judicial Watch. “I have received complaints before but never a call like this, threatening to put me out of business if I don’t cut the video.”

Masada told Judicial Watch that after the video was posted on November 9, he got a phone call from a “prominent” member of the Democratic frontrunner’s campaign.

“He said the video was disgusting and asked who put me up to this,” Masada said.

The jokes aren't especially funny, but it's not entirely farfetched that someone at ClintonWorld overreacted badly. We're talking about an organization that includes the likes of Media Matters' David Brock who tried claiming that the New York Times has a "special place in hell" for running stories about Hillary's emails and accused it of being a “megaphone for conservative propaganda”.

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by weird paranoid operatives like that who overreact badly and act like unhinged political thugs.

So there's no way to know if a phone call that wasn't recorded actually happened, but it's not implausible that something like this could happen. If you remember some of the meltdowns by prominent Hillary supporters when she was losing to Obama, it's not even that farfetched.

The media has predictably not covered the story. At least until Slate's Michelle Goldberg ran it as "Here Is How Your Hillary Smear Sausage Gets Made".

This is Slate and Goldberg is a The Nation vet so there's no actual expose here. Goldberg admits that Masada is no right winger. Her sole proof that this is a "smear" is a denial from the Clinton campaign. This is a campaign that has denied anything and everything. It's a campaign that denied the criminal investigation by the FBI of Hillary's emails was a criminal investigation.

So a denial from the Clinton campaign means nothing. Yet it's the only evidence Michelle Goldberg has for not only claiming that it didn't happen, but accusing some vast-right wing conspiracy of a "smear".

...

What we have here is a small-scale demonstration of how Hillary spin sausage gets made. Michelle Goldberg's spin will be cited by numerous liberal sites. They will claim that the Slate story "proves" it didn't happen. Soon it becomes fact among liberals none of whom will bother with the original story and just repost Goldberg's spin. And that is why Michelle Goldberg and Slate even did the piece. It's just more denial content for the liberal echo chamber. It's the equivalent of "Na-na-na I can't hear you" as journalism.

That's how Hillary spin gets made.

Here's How Pathetic Hillary Clinton Defenders Have Become

 

[candycorn]

Can anyone stop Hillary? Anyone can stop Hillary.

no

 

[Sarah G]

Can anyone stop Hillary? Anyone can stop Hillary.

no

No They Can't.. Her new motto.

 

[Circe]

Possibly Trump could stop Hillary: I don't think anyone else can.

The professional pols will try to pull Trump down and prop up George Bush's brother in his place ----------- THAT won't work to stop Hillary!!