Can someone tell me when it was that Gays had different drinking fountains?...

With 75% of kids born out of wedlock to heterosexuals in some cultures in this country and one parent households on the rise raising children in poverty pointing fingers at gays and lesbians is about as ignorant approach there is.

Good thing we have children. Something gay couples can't supply within their coupling, but rely on.

Now, should we continue about the differing couple dynamics?
 
With 75% of kids born out of wedlock to heterosexuals in some cultures in this country and one parent households on the rise raising children in poverty pointing fingers at gays and lesbians is about as ignorant approach there is.

Wouldn't 100% of all gay and lesbian couples with children have them outside of wedlock?
 
I do believe Clayton explained this to you already. Brietbart's spin does not the truth make. L v T was about consenting sexual intimacy within the privacy of one's own home. It meant we could fuck, not legally marry, darlin'.


Ahhh the idiocy never ceases , yes you "fuck"and FUCK YOU can - but you're still deflective and quoting out of context



Geez , do I have to draw a picture for you "fuckers" . :eusa_whistle:

PS OT: How does a dyke do the above mentioned act without the proper equipment, is it a fake phallic [Dildo] - store bought plastic ? If so, then it would be fake fucking just like your fake marriages - correct ?

Kennedy said that the Constitution protects "personal decisions relating to marriage…”

…for those eligible to enter into marriage contracts, such as same-sex couples.

If one wishes to marry two other men, she’s unable to do so because there is no marriage law in existence to accommodate such a configuration; neither the 14th Amendment nor Lawrence changes that. And that fact will remain when the Supreme Court invalidates Amendment 3, or another such measure repugnant to the Constitution.

But at least you’re consistent at being wrong.

there is no marriage law in existence to accommodate such a configuration

Yawn, stretch ho-hum , pardon me while I scratch my ass .....
Married lesbian ‘throuple’ expecting first child
 
Oh boy. I always feel so bad for the sexual partners of straight men when said men feel the need to ask how we lesbians have sex. If straight men can't figure it out, the women they're sleeping with must not be having a very good time.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

PS OT: How does a dyke do the above mentioned act without the proper equipment, is it a fake phallic [Dildo] - store bought plastic ? If so, then it would be fake fucking just like your fake marriages - correct ?

Obviouslly the pun went right over your head
 
With 75% of kids born out of wedlock to heterosexuals in some cultures in this country and one parent households on the rise raising children in poverty pointing fingers at gays and lesbians is about as ignorant approach there is.

Wouldn't 100% of all gay and lesbian couples with children have them outside of wedlock?

Not in 50% of the US currently, and 100% soon enough, should they choose the path many of us do.

If you think about it about, shouldn't the best way to raise a child be two or three generations around them? That was reality for ages and ages. Do you oppose tradition?
 
With 75% of kids born out of wedlock to heterosexuals in some cultures in this country and one parent households on the rise raising children in poverty pointing fingers at gays and lesbians is about as ignorant approach there is.

You can't blame Gays for all societal decay, they are only one of the results of societal decay , moral collapse and disintegration of the family - they aren't the cause, they're the result.
 
With 75% of kids born out of wedlock to heterosexuals in some cultures in this country and one parent households on the rise raising children in poverty pointing fingers at gays and lesbians is about as ignorant approach there is.

You can't blame Gays for all societal decay, they are only one of the results of societal decay , moral collapse and disintegration of the family - they aren't the cause, they're the result.
Did you buy the old lie that Jesus was Pro-Family? Seems as though you did.
 
With 75% of kids born out of wedlock to heterosexuals in some cultures in this country and one parent households on the rise raising children in poverty pointing fingers at gays and lesbians is about as ignorant approach there is.

Wouldn't 100% of all gay and lesbian couples with children have them outside of wedlock?

Not in 50% of the US currently, and 100% soon enough, should they choose the path many of us do.

If you think about it about, shouldn't the best way to raise a child be two or three generations around them? That was reality for ages and ages. Do you oppose tradition?

No child has ever been produced through a male to male or a female to female coupling. Try again.
 
Wouldn't 100% of all gay and lesbian couples with children have them outside of wedlock?

Not in 50% of the US currently, and 100% soon enough, should they choose the path many of us do.

If you think about it about, shouldn't the best way to raise a child be two or three generations around them? That was reality for ages and ages. Do you oppose tradition?

No child has ever been produced through a male to male or a female to female coupling. Try again.

And? Is producing a child the requirement for legal marriage? Anywhere?
 
Not in 50% of the US currently, and 100% soon enough, should they choose the path many of us do.

If you think about it about, shouldn't the best way to raise a child be two or three generations around them? That was reality for ages and ages. Do you oppose tradition?

No child has ever been produced through a male to male or a female to female coupling. Try again.

And? Is producing a child the requirement for legal marriage? Anywhere?

Excellent argument for Siblings marrying... you have a lot of those. :thup:

:)

peace...
 
One heterosexual mother does not make a father either.

Shitty justifies shittier?...

Fuck you. :thup:

And Liberal policies destroyed Marriage before Deviants were removed from the APAs mental list.

:)

peace...

Overzealous Socio-Fascist Feminism is the first domino on that slippery slope.

And it is closely related to the Gay Agenda

Charlotte Bunch, an ultra left radical feminist is a founding member and current board member of this group. She authored this disturbing document stating that all feminists must be lesbians. " Lesbians must become feminists and fight against woman oppression, just as feminists must become Lesbians if they hope to end male supremacy.... Race, class, and national oppressions come from men, serve ruling class white men's interests, and have no place in a woman-identified revolution....Changes which will have more than token effects on our lives will be led by women-identified Lesbians who understand the nature of our oppression and are therefore in a position to end it. "Lesbians In Revolt - by Charlotte Bunch Source
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top