LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,017
- 17,400
- 2,250
It will take a lot of research to arrive at an informed guess but as the NFL sits right now I see no reason why not...especially if the AFC team is as weak physically as Denver.
Arizona seems to keep coming up with hard nosed defenses.
SF has a lot of motivation but can't seem to do better than split with the Hawks in the reg season.
The Carroll formula has developed into a "cult" mindset that only appears to be gathering steam.
If Seattle drafted no players this year and just paid those that need to get paid the team would still be better in 2014 than last season. The only game the whole team played even close to their potential was last weekend. And almost to a man the players believe that there is room to improve individually. That is a scary thought for the rest of the NFL.
Damn straight they'll repeat.you look at their schedule they have and i think they had a more difficult schedule to play LAST year then they do this year.like you said,considering how weak the AFC is and the niners still havent figured out how to win at seattle yet and the fact that the last couple times they lost to the niners at the stick they only did so by less than a field goal.also they lost a couple of key starters this year so that will really hurt them.
where the only key starter the hawks lost was Golden tate.The hawks kicking game wont be as strong but they still got most their players intact and while Wilsons favorite target tate will be gone,their offense will still be dangerous being able to still line up harvin,kearse,baldwin and their other receiver they lost for half the season last year.
Having him and Harvin together in the backfiled at the same time and if they can both stay healthy for at least most the season? its going to lights out for the other teams especially since wilson is only going to be even better this year than last.
while the cards can cause the Hawks problems,Im glad you didnt fall for the line of B.S that sports announcers have been spreading around the league that the LAMBS will be a team to be reconckoned with in the NFC as well.they cant be serious?Fisher has become senile hiring brian shittenhiemer as the offensive coordinater for them.he got booed out of new york for being so conservative on offense and has never done anything impressive his whole career yet that idiot hired him?
that why they let him go at tennesse cause he got senile and stupid in his old age.
and Bradford is hardly a dangerous quarterback,i cant believe they brought him back.
they remind me of the former LA RAIDERS.When the Broncos were an excellent team and had elway and were in the playoffs every year,whenever they played the raiders who were a lousy team all those years,they always struggled to beat them even if it was at home.same with the Lambs,against the rest of the league,they play bad against but whenever they face the seahawks,they raise the play of the game and always play well against them.they dont play like the Lambs like they do the rest the season.they seem to have their number and always make it difficule for the seahawks to beat them when they face each other somehow. you got to be able to play well against other teams as well though to be consaidered a team on the rise though.last time i checked,the LAMBS dont fit that bill.
![]()
Actually IMHO the loss of Red Bryant was as big an impact to Seattle in regards to Santa Clara.
Like the Hawks the 9ers are throwing the fewest times compared to the rest of the NFC. The run is what gets er done with both of those squads.
The big question in the NFC West for me is if Gore can produce yards this late in his career. Santa Clara would have lost against the hawks in SF if Gore hadn't got lucky in his 54 yard run. He had been thoroughly contained up until that end of the game scamper. THAT wont happen again this season. A couple of our defenders were just out of position and took bad angles which is highly out of character for our defense.
Also the conservative approach Carroll uses offensively will take a back seat as Percy Harvin starts and plays in every game this season. Now that it is clear HOW to use him to keep the other team off balance ..there is no reason to get him hurt. Just put him in enough to blast for 50-100 yards or so on half a dozen plays just like in the SB. The rest of the time use him as a decoy with little to no hard contact.
Tate only left because he knows the ring is the thing in getting attention or in other words a big fat contract in free agency from another team.
Tate wanted to work on building his stats which Seattle wasn't going to do for him. If any receiver was going to get more touches this season it is going to be Percy Harvin.
Contrary to some ex player TV comentators our receivers are definitely NOT pedestrian.
Wilson puts the all exactly where he should and our receivers drop the ball less than any team I can think of. We just don't run that dink and dunk pass game that is famous with the West Coast offense.
I don't think Tate will make it through this season un injured in Detroit. HOW a reciever is used is important no matter how good he is.
Denver is a prime example of taking arguably the best stable of receivers and a great defense beating the crap out of them and making them useless as they all start hearing footsteps.
Yes Seattle stands a BETTER chance this season for a number of reasons. Every great receiver they face will be thinking how Seattle smacked Denvers receivers around in the Super Bowl and cracked dudes ribs and shit.
true,didnt think about that.
can you imiagine the nightmares others defenses will have not only having to worry about a scrambling quarterback who can throw it deep down the field accurately having to try and contain him when he gets out of the pocket who will be able to read defenses even better this year than last year,bit on top of all that,they will at the same time,have to deal with trying to contain kearse,baldwin,harvin AND rice all at the same time?
defensive coordinaters are going to be pulling the hair out of thei heads in frustration and anger
wison will have just too many weapons at his diposal and again,he will be playing even better this year than last which is really scary for the rest of league. the only real concern we have is they wont have as much depth on the defense as they did last year with the defection of Bryant and a couple of others on D.that was a major factor why their defense played so well last year was the depth they had able to keep fresh bodies in there all the time so thats the only one concern they'll have.
and yeah,Gore isnt getting any younger so it will be interesting to see how his body will hold up this year.the fact that they play each other towards the end of the season when he has had all the wear and tear on him and it will be TWICE in three weeks,thats not going to help the situation either.He is going to wondering why the schedule makers were so cruel to him this year especially after he has to face them the second time after taking a beating from theHawks D just two weeks previouslyr
btw,speaking of the niners,whatever happend to manningham do you know? he was on their roster at the beginning of the year but i remember in the mondy night game against them this past year michales saying that he wasnt availlable for the game along with crabtree because of injurys sustained.was it a season ending one cause we never heard anything about him again after that?
Last edited: