Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2017
- 46,062
- 29,788
Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you think that intelligence operations should be discussed in open court?Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
??? Is the fact that an entity, policy, procedure or people who administer it may/might be "abused" is sufficient basis for you to conclude that it is a "POS?"Can we all finally agree that FISA has to go? Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
It is unconstitutional. Period.So you think that intelligence operations should be discussed in open court?Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
What's unconstitutional about it?It is unconstitutional. Period.So you think that intelligence operations should be discussed in open court?Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
the COTUS requires evidence for the issue of a search warrant. Does "secret" evidence count?What's unconstitutional about it?It is unconstitutional. Period.So you think that intelligence operations should be discussed in open court?Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
ALL unconstitutional agencies must go.WOW. Suddenly you get these righties caring about fisa?
THey were really cool with it when they wanted to use it against brown people . Now you change your tune ?
End our wars on crime, drugs, and terror.Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
Also unconstitutionalEnd our wars on drugs, and terror.
See, this is where you are WRONG AGAIN!!!WOW. Suddenly you get these righties caring about fisa?
THey were really cool with it when they wanted to use it against brown people . Now you change your tune ?
the COTUS requires evidence for the issue of a search warrant. Does "secret" evidence count?What's unconstitutional about it?It is unconstitutional. Period.So you think that intelligence operations should be discussed in open court?Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
Besides that, isnt a federal judge ruling in abstract unconstitutional?
Nothing but repeal is too much hard work for the right wing when they have a majority in Congress, for the moment; and allege they are for smaller government whenever it is about the poor.Also unconstitutionalEnd our wars on drugs, and terror.
Fuck em
ya big broken record![]()
Maybe we should all sue so it will go to them!the COTUS requires evidence for the issue of a search warrant. Does "secret" evidence count?What's unconstitutional about it?It is unconstitutional. Period.So you think that intelligence operations should be discussed in open court?Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
Besides that, isnt a federal judge ruling in abstract unconstitutional?
It is unconstitutional, why hasn't no case been brought to the SC?
The SCOTUS will have to do a lot of interpretation to rule FISA is constitutional
We all know the duopoly is full of shit.Nothing but repeal is too much hard work for the right wing when they have a majority in Congress, for the moment; and allege they are for smaller government whenever it is about the poor.Also unconstitutionalEnd our wars on drugs, and terror.
Fuck em
ya big broken record![]()
See, this is where you are WRONG AGAIN!!!WOW. Suddenly you get these righties caring about fisa?
THey were really cool with it when they wanted to use it against brown people . Now you change your tune ?
I am a liberal. I have always been a liberal.
Liberals HATE this shit and have always hated it.
Those defending in are NOT liberals. They are statist commie authoritarians.
Who has standing to bring a matter to bring to the SC? Most people don't even know they were violated. If then, will a lower court rule it unconstitutional? Will the SC grant cert?It is unconstitutional, why hasn't no case been brought to the SC?
You dont think a big enough law suit with previous SC judgements would help?Who has standing to bring a matter to bring to the SC? Most people don't even know they were violated. If then, will a lower court rule it unconstitutional? Will the SC grant cert?It is unconstitutional, why hasn't no case been brought to the SC?
It's too hard to prove a case against the Fed Gov for civil rights violations. It need to be shit canned now.
We have a mixed-market economy.We all know the duopoly is full of shit.Nothing but repeal is too much hard work for the right wing when they have a majority in Congress, for the moment; and allege they are for smaller government whenever it is about the poor.Also unconstitutionalEnd our wars on drugs, and terror.
Fuck em
ya big broken record![]()
Why wouldn't secret evidence count? The evidence still requires to be judged on merit and if someone is indicted the prosecution still has to give the evidence. The rights of the defense are still adhered to. The process is the same as any other request for a warrant. The difference being that the findings aren't made public.the COTUS requires evidence for the issue of a search warrant. Does "secret" evidence count?What's unconstitutional about it?It is unconstitutional. Period.So you think that intelligence operations should be discussed in open court?Now that we have an example of how FISA might be abused, do we agree to shit can that POS?
Besides that, isnt a federal judge ruling in abstract unconstitutional?