Spare_change
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 8,690
- 1,293
- 280
You are EVER so wrong ....The point? There is always a higher order who sits in judgement of your actions. You can claim this is the courts, or you can claim it is the government. You can even claim it is your fellow man. But, then, you have to ask the question: Who judges the judges? And, who judges those who judge the judges? Someone, somewhere, must sit in ultimate judgement.
Only if you choose to recognize such an entity. If not, you are the final arbiter. That is scripture.
1 Thessalonians 5:21 Test all things; hold fast what is good.
That there is a higher judgement is your judgement yet you do not know God at all. No one does.
Since we know that there is no single man who rules over all others, then it follows that God must be superior to man. Only He can judge the actions of man. Man does not have the ability to judge God.
Yet you have and have judged God to be good.
To judge man, God must be here to give his verdict. He is not.
Actually, it's pretty simple - who is the ultimate authority? Clearly, it can't be man - so just who the hell is it?
Not God as he is not here. man is here and like you, many have set God as good, even though he is shown to be a genocidal son murderer.
Do you think genocidal to be a good character trait?
Regards
DL
I do not JUDGE God .... I ACCEPT God .... a world of difference.
As for the rest of your post, I marvel at your ability to twist truth and reality to suit your need. But, hey, you know the price ...
Yes. Clear moral thinking as compared to Christian immorality.
Go use your fear mongering on children just as it was used against you. I am immune to your garbage.
So is this bishop.
Regards
DL
Moral thinking, you say? Just where did these so-called morals come from? Let me guess .... some amorphous group think, right?
Morals like religion are human constructs that have evolved over time.
Really?
Then, how does that explain the moral equivocation of man? You will do what is best for you, no matter the impact on others. That which is unacceptable for others is merely the norm for you. You chastise those who cheat others, who cheat on their spouses, but yet, you strategize every day on how to take advantage of others, how to cheat them out of their share, and how to avoid detection by your wife.
Hardly a highly evolved set of morals, wouldn't you say? "It depends" .... THAT is a moral code?
God, on the other hand, has a clearly defined moral code that He has passed on to His followers. There's no ambiguity on right or wrong, and certainly no ambiguity on the consequences of intentional disregard.
Which one is more "evolved"?