CEO of Goldman Sachs Calls Out Kamala Harris for Lying About Their “Report” During Debate

[Independent thinker]

You know today is only Wednesday. The trajectory of Harris' numbers is clear - steadily upward

That's just not true. She went steadily up and then came back some to the point that it is 50/50 in the swing states. You've got your head in your ass just as the far right does who read The Gateway Pundit. You probably get your news from MSNBC.

 

[IM2]

The nation saw the debte. Trump got his ass whipped.

 

[Rawley]

That's fine. Nothing wrong with that. But, it doesn't mean shit if voters don't care if he sets the record straight or not. My reply was to the poster who is wasting time in trying to help Trump by posting something that isn't actually going to help Trump. If we want to win we need to concentrate on things that will actually help Trump win. If we are just posting to get pats on the back and likes from those who are going to vote for Trump anyway, we aren't helping Trump win. We need to help Trump win because this election is going to be a nail biter.

I think pointing out that she's a lying sack of excrement is helpful to Trump. IMHO he only need two sets of ads from now until the election. One set - positive ads about what he and his policies will do to improve people's lives and a second set with nothing but the videos of Kamala in her own words advocating her extreme radical positions.

 

[Doc7505]

Another lie from the gatewaypundit.

Just how high can a dead cat bounce...Splat!!

 

[Independent thinker]

I think pointing out that she's a lying sack of excrement is helpful to Trump. IMHO he only need two sets of ads from now until the election. One set - positive ads about what he and his policies will do to improve people's lives and a second set with nothing but the videos of Kamala in her own words advocating her extreme radical positions.

It's NOT helpful to Trump because those who would be helpful to Trump don't give a damn about the CEO of Goldman Sachs. They think he's nothing but a Trump humping one percenter and is probably lying to help Trump. They wouldn't believe him. We've got to concentrate on kitchen table stuff and quit talking about abortions after birth and people eating pets. That's how we lose. We have to keep our eyes on the football and the football is the bread and butter issues where polls clearly show voters favor Republicans on.

 

[citygator]

Now the CEO of Goldman Sachs is confirming Kamala is a liar. This is bad news for Kamala. The CEO went on to criticize the way Harris lied and exaggerated the findings of the report, inflating its importance to boost her political agenda.

“This was blown up into something far bigger than what it was intended to show,”

CEO of Goldman Sachs Calls Out Kamala Harris for Lying About Their "Report" During Debate | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon didn’t hold back during an appearance on CNBC’s ‘Halftime Report,’ where he voiced criticism of Kamala Harris for misrepresenting data from a report that Harris touted during the recent presidential debate, which was largely ignored by the debate’s biased moderators.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

What was the lie?

 

[Doc7505]

The nation saw the debte. Trump got his ass whipped.

~~~~~~
Indeed, what the people of this nation saw was the moderators of ABC attempting to sway the debate against Trump and for Kamala...
It was too obvious. That is why Harris is not getting the bounce expected by her supposed debate.
Trump say's they'll be no further debates....

ABC's Moderators Failed to Fact-Check Kamala Harris​

Either fact-check both candidates or don't bother.​

ABC's moderators failed to fact-check Kamala Harris

This week's first and possibly only debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump was not nearly as consequential as the

reason.com

12 Sep 2024 ~~ By Robby Soave

This week's first and possibly only debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump was not nearly as consequential as the June debate, which ended President Joe Biden's political career. It also differed in another key way: The moderation was incredibly one-sided and unfair.
This was not true of the previous debate, between Biden and Trump. CNN's Jake Tapper and Dana Bash asked questions but did not interrupt or attempt to fact-check the candidates—they left that to Trump and Biden. Such an approach is preferable; politicians make so many incorrect statements that if the moderators really felt the need to intervene every single time, debates would devolve into showdowns between the moderators and each candidate, which isn't the point. There are also frequent examples of moderators asserting that a given claim is abjectly false when it may be complicated, ambiguous, or a case where reasonable minds disagree.
ABC's David Muir and Linsey Davis thrice followed a remark by Trump with an attempt to fact-check him. These fact-checks introduced valid, conflicting information; Trump said violence in the U.S. was out of control and the moderators pointed to FBI data that contradicts this, and Trump said that Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating pets—a completely erroneous claim.
But when Harris made statements that could have been fact-checked, the moderators declined to do so.
~Snip~
Then there was bias reflected in the kinds of questions the candidates were asked. Trump was deservedly grilled on his appalling conduct surrounding the 2020–2021 presidential transition, and comments he made about Harris' race. Meanwhile, Harris fielded zero questions about her complicity in the vast cover-up of Biden's cognitive decline and infirmity. When she declined to give specific reasons for her flip-flopping on fracking—or even concede that she has flip-flopped—the moderators did not follow up.