Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you certain? Bill Clinton sent China computers with retrievable confidential information on everything we know about defending ourselves, and everybody on the hill knows this. If China and Russia are still in joint operations, China is just testing out our technology as of the day Clinton sent them this info.Time will tell who is right and who is wrong. I believe it is very possible the Russians and Chinese could invade the USA and take us down. Things are not looking good. - J.
Forget about China, even Russia does not have the capacity to invade the US. God forbid if the war breaks out between the US and Russia, it will be fought with stand off weapons. We all will be dead in few hours. There will be no one left to invade anyone.
I think Obama is a Manchurian candidate gone all the way to the top with the instructions from Jeremiah Wright
And I certainly don't think this is any kind of a conspiracy theory.
Maybe because I had another point to make? It certainly wasn't because you were right about what we did in those country's, when looking at things in the proper perspective. Yeah, we destroyed a lot of shit and here we are, 10 years later and we still don't control everything. In fact, we have to pay the Taliban to guard our convoy's out to remote outposts. If we're so bad ass, why are we paying our enemy not to shoot at us?Then why did you change the subject so quickly, big mouth?
Were you asleep when Justice Roberts had his say on the "Affordable" Health care tax? The entire left was sayingThe highest tax hike in the history of the world? That's a pretty bold claim.![]()
Were you asleep when Justice Roberts had his say on the "Affordable" Health care tax? The entire left was sayingThe highest tax hike in the history of the world? That's a pretty bold claim.![]()
Do you think Supreme Court Justice Roberts lied when he said the reason the Supreme Court could NOT rule on the "Affordable" Care Act was because in actuality it was a Federal Tax, which is under the jurisdiction of another branch of government, the Legislative Branch and Congress to be very exact.
Health Care a Tax?
Yep, a tax. That's the opinion of the majority on the Supreme Court, with noted exceptions.
The highest damn tax levied against the "Middle Class" in this free nation's history.
Setting slavery (a 100% tax) aside, yes, it is the highest tax in the history of the world passed by a legislative body.
I'm so sorry people can't wrap their minds around something Congress calls "Affordable" being the highest tax in history.
It has to be because the 30% of American workers who work 40 hours a week or more have to pay a lot for everybody else, some of whom are students or younger, some of whom are retired between the ages of 62 and 110, and some who are totally disabled and unable to hold a job due to their illness.
I reiterate, Nancy Pelosi resided over a Congress who passed the highest nonwar tax in the history of the United States for an item that was considered personal responsibility by the authors of the Constitution--medical expenses due to bad luck and old age, which at that time one saved to cushion the issues that would come when one grew incapable of taking care of himself or herself.
Nobody starved, because those bad church people the highly contentious atheists are pissing and moaning about cooked and took food to the indigent.
As I understand it, it's the highest tax in the history of the world. In the future it will take food off the American family's table, and farmers will not work for nothing, although some of them say they already do, as they lose their farms often in droughts, drug/alcohol abuse, and floods.Were you asleep when Justice Roberts had his say on the "Affordable" Health care tax? The entire left was sayingThe highest tax hike in the history of the world? That's a pretty bold claim.![]()
Do you think Supreme Court Justice Roberts lied when he said the reason the Supreme Court could NOT rule on the "Affordable" Care Act was because in actuality it was a Federal Tax, which is under the jurisdiction of another branch of government, the Legislative Branch and Congress to be very exact.
Health Care a Tax?
Yep, a tax. That's the opinion of the majority on the Supreme Court, with noted exceptions.
The highest damn tax levied against the "Middle Class" in this free nation's history.
Setting slavery (a 100% tax) aside, yes, it is the highest tax in the history of the world passed by a legislative body.
I'm so sorry people can't wrap their minds around something Congress calls "Affordable" being the highest tax in history.
It has to be because the 30% of American workers who work 40 hours a week or more have to pay a lot for everybody else, some of whom are students or younger, some of whom are retired between the ages of 62 and 110, and some who are totally disabled and unable to hold a job due to their illness.
I reiterate, Nancy Pelosi resided over a Congress who passed the highest nonwar tax in the history of the United States for an item that was considered personal responsibility by the authors of the Constitution--medical expenses due to bad luck and old age, which at that time one saved to cushion the issues that would come when one grew incapable of taking care of himself or herself.
Nobody starved, because those bad church people the highly contentious atheists are pissing and moaning about cooked and took food to the indigent.
Thank you for that whole lot of nothing.
Nothing in this post provides evidence of your claim. You said this is the highest tax hike in the history of the world. There have been many, many nations over the course of thousands of years. There have been all kinds of taxes. You have neither explained how large this particular tax hike is nor given your evidence that it is larger than any other in the history of the world.
Trying to push that onto me by saying I can't wrap my head around the 'Affordable Care Act' being the highest tax is deflection. I didn't say this wasn't a tax hike, or that it wasn't a large one. I said your claim, now repeated, that this is the largest tax hike in the history of the world is very bold. It seems more like a bunch of made-up crap, actually, but I was being diplomatic about it.
So......got any actual evidence of the claim, or just going to rant a bit more?
EDIT : Oh, and I like that you've moved the goalposts to call it the highest tax hike in the history of the world by a legislative body.![]()
The Supreme Court upheld the health care reform law on Thursday in a ruling in which conservative Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberal wing and spelled out ways to keep the highly controversial law within the bounds of the Constitution. The ruling vindicates President Obama’s signature domestic policy initiative, even if it doesn’t stop the political debate over the sweeping Affordable Care Act.
The 5-4 ruling lets stand the mandate – the requirement that just about everyone carry health insurance or pay a fine. But the ruling calls the fine a tax, allowing the law to escape arguments that it violates the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel joined other Republicans in calling for its repeal, saying the decision "sets the stage for the November election." He identified the law as a pivotal issue in his campaign to unseat incumbent U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown.
Mandel issued a statement on the day of the decision asserting that Brown had voted "for what will likely go down as the biggest tax increase in history."
Were you asleep when Justice Roberts had his say on the "Affordable" Health care tax? The entire left was sayingThe highest tax hike in the history of the world? That's a pretty bold claim.![]()
Do you think Supreme Court Justice Roberts lied when he said the reason the Supreme Court could NOT rule on the "Affordable" Care Act was because in actuality it was a Federal Tax, which is under the jurisdiction of another branch of government, the Legislative Branch and Congress to be very exact.
Health Care a Tax?
Yep, a tax. That's the opinion of the majority on the Supreme Court, with noted exceptions.
The highest damn tax levied against the "Middle Class" in this free nation's history.
Setting slavery (a 100% tax) aside, yes, it is the highest tax in the history of the world passed by a legislative body.
I'm so sorry people can't wrap their minds around something Congress calls "Affordable" being the highest tax in history.
It has to be because the 30% of American workers who work 40 hours a week or more have to pay a lot for everybody else, some of whom are students or younger, some of whom are retired between the ages of 62 and 110, and some who are totally disabled and unable to hold a job due to their illness.
I reiterate, Nancy Pelosi resided over a Congress who passed the highest nonwar tax in the history of the United States for an item that was considered personal responsibility by the authors of the Constitution--medical expenses due to bad luck and old age, which at that time one saved to cushion the issues that would come when one grew incapable of taking care of himself or herself.
Nobody starved, because those bad church people the highly contentious atheists are pissing and moaning about cooked and took food to the indigent.
As I understand it, it's the highest tax in the history of the world. In the future it will take food off the American family's table, and farmers will not work for nothing, although some of them say they already do, as they lose their farms often in droughts, drug/alcohol abuse, and floods.Were you asleep when Justice Roberts had his say on the "Affordable" Health care tax? The entire left was saying
Do you think Supreme Court Justice Roberts lied when he said the reason the Supreme Court could NOT rule on the "Affordable" Care Act was because in actuality it was a Federal Tax, which is under the jurisdiction of another branch of government, the Legislative Branch and Congress to be very exact.
Health Care a Tax?
Yep, a tax. That's the opinion of the majority on the Supreme Court, with noted exceptions.
The highest damn tax levied against the "Middle Class" in this free nation's history.
Setting slavery (a 100% tax) aside, yes, it is the highest tax in the history of the world passed by a legislative body.
I'm so sorry people can't wrap their minds around something Congress calls "Affordable" being the highest tax in history.
It has to be because the 30% of American workers who work 40 hours a week or more have to pay a lot for everybody else, some of whom are students or younger, some of whom are retired between the ages of 62 and 110, and some who are totally disabled and unable to hold a job due to their illness.
I reiterate, Nancy Pelosi resided over a Congress who passed the highest nonwar tax in the history of the United States for an item that was considered personal responsibility by the authors of the Constitution--medical expenses due to bad luck and old age, which at that time one saved to cushion the issues that would come when one grew incapable of taking care of himself or herself.
Nobody starved, because those bad church people the highly contentious atheists are pissing and moaning about cooked and took food to the indigent.
Thank you for that whole lot of nothing.
Nothing in this post provides evidence of your claim. You said this is the highest tax hike in the history of the world. There have been many, many nations over the course of thousands of years. There have been all kinds of taxes. You have neither explained how large this particular tax hike is nor given your evidence that it is larger than any other in the history of the world.
Trying to push that onto me by saying I can't wrap my head around the 'Affordable Care Act' being the highest tax is deflection. I didn't say this wasn't a tax hike, or that it wasn't a large one. I said your claim, now repeated, that this is the largest tax hike in the history of the world is very bold. It seems more like a bunch of made-up crap, actually, but I was being diplomatic about it.
So......got any actual evidence of the claim, or just going to rant a bit more?
EDIT : Oh, and I like that you've moved the goalposts to call it the highest tax hike in the history of the world by a legislative body.![]()
Sorry what I think disturbs you so.
Not all the justices were convinced. "In our view, the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety, conservative justice Anthony Kennedy who many court watchers thought would be the swing vote -- wrote in his dissent.
So sorry, Montrovant. I guess I thought you had read the opinions and knew why I said that. My bad. Here you go:As I understand it, it's the highest tax in the history of the world. In the future it will take food off the American family's table, and farmers will not work for nothing, although some of them say they already do, as they lose their farms often in droughts, drug/alcohol abuse, and floods.Thank you for that whole lot of nothing.
Nothing in this post provides evidence of your claim. You said this is the highest tax hike in the history of the world. There have been many, many nations over the course of thousands of years. There have been all kinds of taxes. You have neither explained how large this particular tax hike is nor given your evidence that it is larger than any other in the history of the world.
Trying to push that onto me by saying I can't wrap my head around the 'Affordable Care Act' being the highest tax is deflection. I didn't say this wasn't a tax hike, or that it wasn't a large one. I said your claim, now repeated, that this is the largest tax hike in the history of the world is very bold. It seems more like a bunch of made-up crap, actually, but I was being diplomatic about it.
So......got any actual evidence of the claim, or just going to rant a bit more?
EDIT : Oh, and I like that you've moved the goalposts to call it the highest tax hike in the history of the world by a legislative body.![]()
Sorry what I think disturbs you so.
So no, no actual evidence. Gotcha.
Sorry my asking for evidence is such a difficult thing for you to wrap your head around.![]()
High Court Upholds Health Care Law
Quote:
The Supreme Court upheld the health care reform law on Thursday in a ruling in which conservative Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberal wing and spelled out ways to keep the highly controversial law within the bounds of the Constitution. The ruling vindicates President Obamas signature domestic policy initiative, even if it doesnt stop the political debate over the sweeping Affordable Care Act.
The 5-4 ruling lets stand the mandate the requirement that just about everyone carry health insurance or pay a fine. But the ruling calls the fine a tax, allowing the law to escape arguments that it violates the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
Josh Mandel says Obamacare will ultimately be 'the biggest tax in history'
Quote:
Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel joined other Republicans in calling for its repeal, saying the decision "sets the stage for the November election." He identified the law as a pivotal issue in his campaign to unseat incumbent U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown.
Mandel issued a statement on the day of the decision asserting that Brown had voted "for what will likely go down as the biggest tax increase in history."
__________________
You won't be laughing when the actual bill is taken from your paycheck, if you get one.Were you asleep when Justice Roberts had his say on the "Affordable" Health care tax? The entire left was sayingThe highest tax hike in the history of the world? That's a pretty bold claim.![]()
Do you think Supreme Court Justice Roberts lied when he said the reason the Supreme Court could NOT rule on the "Affordable" Care Act was because in actuality it was a Federal Tax, which is under the jurisdiction of another branch of government, the Legislative Branch and Congress to be very exact.
Health Care a Tax?
Yep, a tax. That's the opinion of the majority on the Supreme Court, with noted exceptions.
The highest damn tax levied against the "Middle Class" in this free nation's history.
Setting slavery (a 100% tax) aside, yes, it is the highest tax in the history of the world passed by a legislative body.
I'm so sorry people can't wrap their minds around something Congress calls "Affordable" being the highest tax in history.
It has to be because the 30% of American workers who work 40 hours a week or more have to pay a lot for everybody else, some of whom are students or younger, some of whom are retired between the ages of 62 and 110, and some who are totally disabled and unable to hold a job due to their illness.
I reiterate, Nancy Pelosi resided over a Congress who passed the highest nonwar tax in the history of the United States for an item that was considered personal responsibility by the authors of the Constitution--medical expenses due to bad luck and old age, which at that time one saved to cushion the issues that would come when one grew incapable of taking care of himself or herself.
Nobody starved, because those bad church people the highly contentious atheists are pissing and moaning about cooked and took food to the indigent.
Somebody had to break Reagan's old record.
Russia and China have a defense treaty, similar to the one between the US and NATO.This is not the thread's fault that some people decided to take extreme view on things. The truth as usual lies somewhere in between. This is true that neither China nor Russian can match the US one on one. They recognize that. They also recognize that they need to put their differences behind and start co-operation with each other. It is true that Russia and China have fought pitched tank battles but since the invasion of Serbia by NATO forces, there has been an urgency between the two to co-operate. They have been increasing bilateral trade steadily besides this naval drill. Russia and China closed an unprecedented business deal in the sum of $270B about a month or so ago. These business deals take care of two things: a) help Russia's with its cash flow issue b) help fill China's technology gap. It is a mutually beneficial relationship which strengthens both countries.
As far as Chinese base in Mexico is concerned, it does not make much sense because Mexico and US have peaceful border and I do not think Mexico is stupid enough to jeopardize that by allowing Chinese base on its soil. Anyhow, I have yet to see a report from a credible news source to take it seriously.
You fight one, you're gonna get both!
Russia and China have Treaty of Friendship. This treaty is not equivalent to NATO. NATO is a military treaty which obligates all its members to pitch in if one of the members is attacked. Neither Russia nor China have such obligation towards each other. Even NATO members are expected to behave responsibly and cannot take the support of other NATO members for granted as we saw in the 2008 crisis of Russia and Georgia over Ossetia.
Russia and China have a defense treaty, similar to the one between the US and NATO.This is not the thread's fault that some people decided to take extreme view on things. The truth as usual lies somewhere in between. This is true that neither China nor Russian can match the US one on one. They recognize that. They also recognize that they need to put their differences behind and start co-operation with each other. It is true that Russia and China have fought pitched tank battles but since the invasion of Serbia by NATO forces, there has been an urgency between the two to co-operate. They have been increasing bilateral trade steadily besides this naval drill. Russia and China closed an unprecedented business deal in the sum of $270B about a month or so ago. These business deals take care of two things: a) help Russia's with its cash flow issue b) help fill China's technology gap. It is a mutually beneficial relationship which strengthens both countries.
As far as Chinese base in Mexico is concerned, it does not make much sense because Mexico and US have peaceful border and I do not think Mexico is stupid enough to jeopardize that by allowing Chinese base on its soil. Anyhow, I have yet to see a report from a credible news source to take it seriously.
You fight one, you're gonna get both!
Russia and China have Treaty of Friendship. This treaty is not equivalent to NATO. NATO is a military treaty which obligates all its members to pitch in if one of the members is attacked. Neither Russia nor China have such obligation towards each other. Even NATO members are expected to behave responsibly and cannot take the support of other NATO members for granted as we saw in the 2008 crisis of Russia and Georgia over Ossetia.