Chris Wallace is a relentless PRICK!

asaratis

Uppity Senior Citizen
Gold Supporting Member
Jun 20, 2009
18,663
7,657
390
Stockbridge
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Chris Wallace repetitively characterizes the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault. The disruptions are directly related to the instructions by the leaders of MoveOn.org and BlackLivesMatter to 'get in and disrupt' the rallies. It is blatantly obvious who is causing the problems that could very well lead to violence and personal injury before the rallies are over.

Chris Wallace and Fox News can kiss my money-making ass!
 
Last edited:
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault. The disruptions are directly related to the instructions by the leaders of MoveOn.org and BlackLivesMatter to 'get in and disrupt' the rallies. It is blatantly obvious who is causing the problems that could very well lead to violence and personal injury before the rallies are over.

Cris Wallace and Fox News can kiss my money-making ass!

Funny. I bet he can spell "Chris"...
 
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault.

No idea how you define a "leader," but to normal people a leader is someone who leads. If Trump can't address a crowd of his supporters and say "Okay, guys, let's have a little dignity here. Let's show the world we're responsible human beings," how do you imagine he will be able to interact with other world leaders?
 
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault.

No idea how you define a "leader," but to normal people a leader is someone who leads. If Trump can't address a crowd of his supporters and say "Okay, guys, let's have a little dignity here. Let's show the world we're responsible human beings," how do you imagine he will be able to interact with other world leaders?
He isn't going to have to worry about that, and he knows it. He's totally shocked this dog and pony show has lasted this long. I honestly thought after the idiot rushed the stage to get to him, at that point he might have said, "fuck it, this shit is getting too dangerous thanks to my stupidity, I'm out of here".
 
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault.

No idea how you define a "leader," but to normal people a leader is someone who leads. If Trump can't address a crowd of his supporters and say "Okay, guys, let's have a little dignity here. Let's show the world we're responsible human beings," how do you imagine he will be able to interact with other world leaders?

He could bring some people to the meetings with other world leaders that would shout insults at them until they got up and left.
 
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault.

No idea how you define a "leader," but to normal people a leader is someone who leads. If Trump can't address a crowd of his supporters and say "Okay, guys, let's have a little dignity here. Let's show the world we're responsible human beings," how do you imagine he will be able to interact with other world leaders?
He isn't going to have to worry about that, and he knows it. He's totally shocked this dog and pony show has lasted this long. I honestly thought after the idiot rushed the stage to get to him, at that point he might have said, "fuck it, this shit is getting too dangerous thanks to my stupidity, I'm out of here".

He could have imitated Bernie Sanders and just given him the microphone and walked away.
 
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault. The disruptions are directly related to the instructions by the leaders of MoveOn.org and BlackLivesMatter to 'get in and disrupt' the rallies. It is blatantly obvious who is causing the problems that could very well lead to violence and personal injury before the rallies are over.

Cris Wallace and Fox News can kiss my money-making ass!

Funny. I bet he can spell "Chris"...
Thanks. I fixed it.
 
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault.

No idea how you define a "leader," but to normal people a leader is someone who leads. If Trump can't address a crowd of his supporters and say "Okay, guys, let's have a little dignity here. Let's show the world we're responsible human beings," how do you imagine he will be able to interact with other world leaders?
Trump doesn't control the number of people that show up for his rallies. He is drawing thousands of people, sometimes 25 or 30 THOUSAND people. There's hardly any vetting of the attendees to determine if they are really Trump supporters. The assholes that want to take away Trump's right to free speech can infiltrate and start their shit.

The people that are causing the trouble are not Trump supporters and do not want ANYONE to listen to what Trump has to say....whether it be "calm down' or 'get the hell out of here'.

The 'leaders' that I referred to in the OP (which you conveniently cut out of your quote of me) are the assholes like Bill Ayers and the BLM ranters who control the delusional crowds that follow them.

Your sense of logic is severely flawed.
 
You know, when I was in the military, the CO of the command had quite a bit of influence on how the command operated by how he talked to us and treated us.

If we were treated well, and discipline was fairly enforced? Morale was high, and we would work extra hard to make the command a success.

If we weren't treated well and discipline was spotty? Morale would be low, and most of the time it was every shop for themselves.

Trump is the leader of his rallies, and so as a leader, he should tell his people to chill out a bit rather than encouraging violence.

Nobody shut down the rally but Trump, and nobody is encouraging violence as much as Trump is.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.
 
Fox News should reconsider its 'Fair and Balanced' claim. It is shameful that pricks like Cris Wallace repetitively characterize the disruptions at the Trump rallies as being Trump's fault.

No idea how you define a "leader," but to normal people a leader is someone who leads. If Trump can't address a crowd of his supporters and say "Okay, guys, let's have a little dignity here. Let's show the world we're responsible human beings," how do you imagine he will be able to interact with other world leaders?
He isn't going to have to worry about that, and he knows it. He's totally shocked this dog and pony show has lasted this long. I honestly thought after the idiot rushed the stage to get to him, at that point he might have said, "fuck it, this shit is getting too dangerous thanks to my stupidity, I'm out of here".
Ahh! Another low intelligence poster.
 
The disruptions are directly related to the instructions by the leaders of MoveOn.org and BlackLivesMatter to 'get in and disrupt' the rallies.

those groups would rather have Trump as the pug nominee (first) then send in the hounds ....

.
 
In other words, despite fox being in the trump camp you don't like how they treat him
 
You know, when I was in the military, the CO of the command had quite a bit of influence on how the command operated by how he talked to us and treated us.

If we were treated well, and discipline was fairly enforced? Morale was high, and we would work extra hard to make the command a success.

If we weren't treated well and discipline was spotty? Morale would be low, and most of the time it was every shop for themselves.

Trump is the leader of his rallies, and so as a leader, he should tell his people to chill out a bit rather than encouraging violence.

Nobody shut down the rally but Trump, and nobody is encouraging violence as much as Trump is.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Yes they do but the media will not recognize or report it.
 
You know, when I was in the military, the CO of the command had quite a bit of influence on how the command operated by how he talked to us and treated us.

If we were treated well, and discipline was fairly enforced? Morale was high, and we would work extra hard to make the command a success.

If we weren't treated well and discipline was spotty? Morale would be low, and most of the time it was every shop for themselves.

Trump is the leader of his rallies, and so as a leader, he should tell his people to chill out a bit rather than encouraging violence.

Nobody shut down the rally but Trump, and nobody is encouraging violence as much as Trump is.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Yes they do but the media will not recognize or report it.

Got any links to show that other candidates have encouraged violence from their supporters? Because, I can give you several where Trump has encouraged it.
 
You know, when I was in the military, the CO of the command had quite a bit of influence on how the command operated by how he talked to us and treated us.

If we were treated well, and discipline was fairly enforced? Morale was high, and we would work extra hard to make the command a success.

If we weren't treated well and discipline was spotty? Morale would be low, and most of the time it was every shop for themselves.

Trump is the leader of his rallies, and so as a leader, he should tell his people to chill out a bit rather than encouraging violence.

Nobody shut down the rally but Trump, and nobody is encouraging violence as much as Trump is.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Maybe he needs to act like a Company Commander and start doing some mass punishments. One of his supporters gets out of line so every one of his supporters has to sit through hours of useless briefings, followed by pointless formations just to get bitched at, and PT smoke sessions.

It would be good for a laugh if nothing else.
 
You know, when I was in the military, the CO of the command had quite a bit of influence on how the command operated by how he talked to us and treated us.

If we were treated well, and discipline was fairly enforced? Morale was high, and we would work extra hard to make the command a success.

If we weren't treated well and discipline was spotty? Morale would be low, and most of the time it was every shop for themselves.

Trump is the leader of his rallies, and so as a leader, he should tell his people to chill out a bit rather than encouraging violence.

Nobody shut down the rally but Trump, and nobody is encouraging violence as much as Trump is.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Yes they do but the media will not recognize or report it.

Got any links to show that other candidates have encouraged violence from their supporters? Because, I can give you several where Trump has encouraged it.
If he is correct that the media does not recognize or report it, then there probably be no links.
 
You know, when I was in the military, the CO of the command had quite a bit of influence on how the command operated by how he talked to us and treated us.

If we were treated well, and discipline was fairly enforced? Morale was high, and we would work extra hard to make the command a success.

If we weren't treated well and discipline was spotty? Morale would be low, and most of the time it was every shop for themselves.

Trump is the leader of his rallies, and so as a leader, he should tell his people to chill out a bit rather than encouraging violence.

Nobody shut down the rally but Trump, and nobody is encouraging violence as much as Trump is.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Maybe he needs to act like a Company Commander and start doing some mass punishments. One of his supporters gets out of line so every one of his supporters has to sit through hours of useless briefings, followed by pointless formations just to get bitched at, and PT smoke sessions.

It would be good for a laugh if nothing else.

If you have a good CO, the command will pretty much police itself and take care of discipline at the lowest possible level.

I considered it a failure one time when I finally had to write up one of my guys at the MEPS. He'd been coming in late, so I punished him by making him be the opening guy for the office for a month. When he still failed to come to work on time, I finally had to write him up and let the command take care of it.

I consider it a failure because I wasn't able to fully handle the problem at the supervisor level and had to pass it up the chain.

If Trump would tell his supporters and campaign workers to simply get them out without hurting them (unless they swing first), and encourage it, there would be a lot less violence.
 
FoxNews probably has the widest variety of political opinions of any channel/network anywhere in the world.

And they do not hide their beliefs or views like "personalities" on other networks. If you see Hannity, you know who he supports and why. You cannot doubt that Juan Williams is a flaming liberal or that Guilfoyle is not a conservative.

Go to CNN or MSNBC or any of the alphabet networks and they go out of their way to claim "neutrality" when they cannot hide their leftist/progressive bias.
 
You know, when I was in the military, the CO of the command had quite a bit of influence on how the command operated by how he talked to us and treated us.

If we were treated well, and discipline was fairly enforced? Morale was high, and we would work extra hard to make the command a success.

If we weren't treated well and discipline was spotty? Morale would be low, and most of the time it was every shop for themselves.

Trump is the leader of his rallies, and so as a leader, he should tell his people to chill out a bit rather than encouraging violence.

Nobody shut down the rally but Trump, and nobody is encouraging violence as much as Trump is.

Other candidates don't have violence problems at their rallies, maybe it's because they don't encourage violence.

Maybe he needs to act like a Company Commander and start doing some mass punishments. One of his supporters gets out of line so every one of his supporters has to sit through hours of useless briefings, followed by pointless formations just to get bitched at, and PT smoke sessions.

It would be good for a laugh if nothing else.

If you have a good CO, the command will pretty much police itself and take care of discipline at the lowest possible level.

I considered it a failure one time when I finally had to write up one of my guys at the MEPS. He'd been coming in late, so I punished him by making him be the opening guy for the office for a month. When he still failed to come to work on time, I finally had to write him up and let the command take care of it.

I consider it a failure because I wasn't able to fully handle the problem at the supervisor level and had to pass it up the chain.

If Trump would tell his supporters and campaign workers to simply get them out without hurting them (unless they swing first), and encourage it, there would be a lot less violence.
There hasn't been a lot of violence at Trump rallies.

We you draw thousands of people (as opposed to the hundreds that other candidates draw) it's easier for hundreds of protesters (disruption specialists) to infiltrate and start some shit.

Hillary had some chanting by BLM goons at one of her rallies. Bernie had the microphone taken away from him at one of his rallies by a BLM goon. He could have had the sound system turned off, but he just stood back and let the bitch talk.
 

Forum List

Back
Top