Christian Science

Jan 1, 2015
280
6
16
Creationism is the only true science. It explains how it REALLY happened. There's no question it can't answer no matter how hard you try
 
Who says Creationism and the hard sciences are mutually exclusive. Read Genesis chapter 1 and keep the theory of the big bang in mind. The bible said God created the world but did not discuss the methods he used to do it.
 
Who says Creationism and the hard sciences are mutually exclusive. Read Genesis chapter 1 and keep the theory of the big bang in mind. The bible said God created the world but did not discuss the methods he used to do it.
Thank you, and he created it old, that's why all the atheist scientists believe in an earth that's been here more than 6-10 thousand years ;-)
 
Who says Creationism and the hard sciences are mutually exclusive. Read Genesis chapter 1 and keep the theory of the big bang in mind. The bible said God created the world but did not discuss the methods he used to do it.
What part of the Big Bang includes talking serpents?
 
Who says Creationism and the hard sciences are mutually exclusive. Read Genesis chapter 1 and keep the theory of the big bang in mind. The bible said God created the world but did not discuss the methods he used to do it.
What part of the Big Bang includes talking serpents?
You must be talking about the garden. The serpent has to do with mans fall not God creation of the universe.
 
My bad, you're correct. I was confusing that guy Jonah from Capt. Ahab's ship who was living in the belly of the whale.
 
Creationism is the only true science. It explains how it REALLY happened. There's no question it can't answer no matter how hard you try
Very true. There had to be something ( matter, a particle, atom, etc. ) created to start with, else nothing would be here. The very first atom or particle didn't just appear from absolutely nothing, and expand into what we call the universe. There had to be a first, a start, or something that was the foundation of everything we know to exist. There's no other logical explanation. It's impossible to get something from nothing. There had to be creation of some form in order to for there to be anything. Evolution never explains from "what" everything evolved. What could possibly start the process of evolution? Where did the first particle or atom come from that started the evolution process?

A creator was the source from which everything started. Nothing becomes matter unless there's something that causes the formation of that matter. And, that "something" doesn't just appear from absolutely nothing. Evolution says that everything evolved from basic building blocks of matter. But, evolution never explains where the building blocks came from. What is the building blocks of cells? What are the building blocks of atoms? Now, where did those building blocks come from? Nothing exist in a void, nothing, it's void. What caused a void to be populated with matter, and therefore no longer a void? Does evolution explain infinite time and space? At what point did time start? And, does space have limits? Is there a place where space ends? What's beyond the known universe? Did evolution somehow start time and create what we call space?

In summary, creation is the only common sense and logical explanation considering what man knows at this point in time. Creationists believes that a supreme power started everything. Evolutionists says that something came from nothing, and started everything. Which makes more sense?
 

Forum List

Back
Top