And no......violence has NEVER been a part of what God and Jesus talked about. What part of "thou shalt not kill" do you not get?
depends on who's manipulating the message BikerSailor.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And no......violence has NEVER been a part of what God and Jesus talked about. What part of "thou shalt not kill" do you not get?
First, tell me a country that still does things the OT way, then tell me how these verses are applicable today. They're not.
And no......violence has NEVER been a part of what God and Jesus talked about. What part of "thou shalt not kill" do you not get?
And this is the problem with literal interpretations of historical documents. There's almost a couple of thousand years of theological interpretation available on just about every issue in the Bible. So why interpret the text in a literal manner? I posted earlier in the thread (I think) about the interpretation of Just War by St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas, yet here we are, dragged back to the literal word in the Bible.
Dude you are like a crazed lunacidal manic in need of serious medication and about 25 years in a streight jacket... go get help quikly go go
thats because it's "Thou shall not MURDER".
Is killing the child of an enemy 'murder'?
What about killing someone who worships a different deity?
Is killing the child of an enemy 'murder'?
What about killing someone who worships a different deity?
hey, I don't have a dog in that race. I'm just clarifying what you see as a conflicting piece of scripture. The translation is Murder not Kill. Though, I'd be interested to see what scripture you use from the NT that validates killing... We can all agree that the OT is a violent sack of shit but thats not the covenant that christians take their name from.
Matthew 8
5. And Jesus having entered into Capernaum, there came to him a centurion calling upon him,
6. and saying, 'Sir, my young man hath been laid in the house a paralytic, fearfully afflicted,'
7. and Jesus saith to him, 'I, having come, will heal him.'
8. And the centurion answering said, 'Sir, I am not worthy that thou mayest enter under my roof, but only say a word, and my servant shall be healed;
9. for I also am a man under authority, having under myself soldiers, and I say to this one, Go, and he goeth, and to another, Be coming, and he cometh, and to my servant, Do this, and he doth [it].'
10. And Jesus having heard, did wonder, and said to those following, 'Verily I say to you, not even in Israel so great faith have I found;
Acts 10
1. And there was a certain man in Cesarea, by name Cornelius, a centurion from a band called Italian,
2. pious, and fearing God with all his house, doing also many kind acts to the people, and beseeching God always,
3. he saw in a vision manifestly, as it were the ninth hour of the day, a messenger of God coming in unto him, and saying to him, 'Cornelius;'
4. and he having looked earnestly on him, and becoming afraid, said, 'What is it, Lord?' And he said to him, 'Thy prayers and thy kind acts came up for a memorial before God,
5. and now send men to Joppa, and send for a certain one Simon, who is surnamed Peter,
6. this one doth lodge with a certain Simon a tanner, whose house is by the sea; this one shall speak to thee what it behoveth thee to do.'
7. And when the messenger who is speaking to Cornelius went away, having called two of his domestics, and a pious soldier of those waiting on him continually,
22. And they said, 'Cornelius, a centurion, a man righteous and fearing God, well testified to, also, by all the nation of the Jews, was divinely warned by a holy messenger to send for thee, to his house, and to hear sayings from thee.'
Jesus said he came to fulfil the OT Law not abolish it your right again PubliusInfinituAs usual you're wrong, cock-polisher; we would not all agree that the Old Testament is anything but the inspired word of God.
It should be noted that Christ made it clear that he did not come to discredit the law... which is expressed in the Old Testament; he said he had not come to change anything in the old law and that the old law was still the law.
Well, exactly how literal should the Bible be taken? Wasn't it taken 100% literally 1000 years ago?
Have we evolved to be 'less in need' of the original message?
Which parts did God 'sort of' mean, and which parts was he serious about?
Seems a tricky thing to chop up parts of it and say 'these ones are true' but 'these ones over here are a nice read, but take them too seriously'.
I do know one thing, you cannot be a Christian in righteous conscious and vote for a candidate that condones Abortion butchery and Homosexual marrige all of which are against the natural breath inspired WORD of GOD.Is killing the child of an enemy 'murder'?
What about killing someone who worships a different deity?
I know this post may be inflammatory, but I am interested in actually understanding why it’s ok for Christians to kill for the state,
why would JC approve?
As usual you're wrong, cock-polisher; we would not all agree that the Old Testament is anything but the inspired word of God.
It should be noted that Christ made it clear that he did not come to discredit the law... which is expressed in the Old Testament; he said he had not come to change anything in the old law and that the old law was still the law.
uh, which is why every martyr from stephen to simon were busy out forming the jesus underground, eh stupid? You can go ahead and think "inspired' if you need to.. but the OT is a giant bowl of violence that clearly conflicts with the message of jebus.
she bears and prophets, dickum head.. spare us the diatribe about unborn babies if YOU are going to pretend that a god who sent BEARS to kill KIDS for the sake of a bald jew's pride is the same message of the NT's jebus.
Your taking that out of context that was a reference to peace time law and had no relevance whatsoever to the defence and preservation of a righteous nation...Cognitive dissonance
What makes you think JC would approve?
"Thou shall not kill"
There's no fine print to mitigate that commandment, is there?
Indeed you are a lunacidal MANIC...[/QUOTE]she bears and prophets, dickum head.. spare us the diatribe about unborn babies if YOU are going to pretend that a god who sent BEARS to kill KIDS for the sake of a bald jew's pride is the same message of the NT's jebus.