Chutkan just denied Trump's discovery request for videotapes--she actually thinks a witness's demeanor can be gleaned from a written record.

[0311]

She's either the dumbest Federal judge or a rubber stamp for Jack Smith.



Or she could be both.

But she has already set a record for appealable rulings and we haven't reached the trial date.

All she wants is a DC jury, 92% Democrats, to convict Trump so the MSM can call him a 'felon' and work election interference at new levels. Never mind the eventual overturning of any conviction on appeal.

She clearly knows the videos are missing and will concoct any farfetched excuse to protect J6 committee and DOJ​

Edited for content video clips are hardly admissible. An edit video tape presupposes the existence of the original. Without original video for comparison purposes, such a clip would prove nothing.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

She's either the dumbest Federal judge or a rubber stamp for Jack Smith.



Or she could be both.

But she has already set a record for appealable rulings and we haven't reached the trial date.

All she wants is a DC jury, 92% Democrats, to convict Trump so the MSM can call him a 'felon' and work election interference at new levels. Never mind the eventual overturning of any conviction on appeal.

She clearly knows the videos are missing and will concoct any farfetched excuse to protect J6 committee and DOJ​

Chutkin determines how the trial goes, not the defense attorneys.

She will not let the Trumpeys engage in further election interference.

 

[K9Buck]

Another win for the good guys.

Yes, all enemies of the Washington Establishment must be imprisoned, by hook or by crook.

 

[0311]

Yes, all enemies of the Washington Establishment must be imprisoned, by hook or by crook.

Here what you and other MAGA MAGGOTS do not understand, P01135809 is not exempt from breaking the law. Judge Chutkin decides what is and what is NOT allowed. The defence has to obey the rules as she interprets them. Edited clip(s) edited for content presuppose the existence of an original tape. That won't work.

P01135809 is a private citizen, subject the laws as any other, he will have to face consequences for his actions.

 

[0311]

But she has already set a record for appealable rulings and we haven't reached the trial date.

Sounds like you have a severe case of butt hurt. Please list the appealble rulings and when she made them (the day, the week and the date of the ruling).

 

[0311]

You're a boot-licking, Godless, fascist, statist. You would have made a fabulous Nazi Brown Shirt.

View attachment 867130

Yes, I am a proud atheist. No I not gay and yes I have reported for using a homoseuxal slur.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Another win for the good guys.

You misspelled communists

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

A personal attack is not a political rebuttal.

Prosecuting the former president for provable crimes certainly is not statist, fascist, or boot licking of any type.

You cannot engage in a plot to overthrow our elections and way of life, get caught, and then cry.

Come on, fascist up.

 

[K9Buck]

Sounds like you have a severe case of butt hurt. Please list the appealble rulings and when she made them (the day, the week and the date of the ruling).

It's amazing that you worship ultra-rich, Washington elites who have robbed the American people of TRILLIONS of dollars over the past half-century. Our standard of living is many times lower than what it would be if it were not for the Washington Establishment stealing all of our wealth. Incredibly, you enthusiastically support them while hating poor and middle-class Americans who want some justice.

 

[K9Buck]

Yes, I am a proud atheist.

God is real, but you are blind to him and you are blind to many truths and you unwittingly work for the other guy.

 

[Blisterfinger]

A personal attack is not a political rebuttal.

Prosecuting the former president for provable crimes certainly is not statist, fascist, or boot licking of any type.

You cannot engage in a plot to overthrow our elections and way of life, get caught, and then cry.

Come on, fascist up.

Engaging in political persecution and law fair against political Rivals is called fascism. That's clearly what this is. Should not be engaged in

 

[Blisterfinger]

It's amazing that you worship ultra-rich, Washington elites who have robbed the American people of TRILLIONS of dollars over the past half-century. Our standard of living is many times lower than what it would be if it were not for the Washington Establishment stealing all of our wealth. Incredibly, you enthusiastically support them while hating poor and middle-class Americans who want some justice.

 

[francoHFW]

She's an affirmative action lawless judge. She has a history of anti-Trump tweets.

Anybody who isn't anti trump is totally misinformed

 

[francoHFW]

Engaging in political persecution and law fair against political Rivals is called fascism. That's clearly what this is. Should not be engaged in

Try a news channel instead of garbage propaganda or Internet conspiracy nuts. Fox is a total disgrace anti American and absolutely FOS.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Try a news channel instead of garbage propaganda or Internet conspiracy nuts. Fox is a total disgrace anti American and absolutely FOS.

Turn away from CNN if you seek the truth

 

[K9Buck]

Anybody who isn't anti trump is totally misinformed

Incredibly, you put the wealth of the ultra-rich Washington elites over the wealth of poor and middle-class Americans.

 

[Nostra]

Chutkin determines how the trial goes, not the defense attorneys.

She will not let the Trumpeys engage in further election interference.

And the way it is going almost assures it will be overturned.

 

[0311]

A personal attack is not a political rebuttal.

Prosecuting the former president for provable crimes certainly is not statist, fascist, or boot licking of any type.

You cannot engage in a plot to overthrow our elections and way of life, get caught, and then cry.

Come on, fascist up.

The personal attack was because he had no argument left to make and pissed off that I had only the truth, but stood up his bully boy bull shit.

 

[Arlette]

She's either the dumbest Federal judge or a rubber stamp for Jack Smith.



Or she could be both.

But she has already set a record for appealable rulings and we haven't reached the trial date.

All she wants is a DC jury, 92% Democrats, to convict Trump so the MSM can call him a 'felon' and work election interference at new levels. Never mind the eventual overturning of any conviction on appeal.

She clearly knows the videos are missing and will concoct any farfetched excuse to protect J6 committee and DOJ​

Whatever else she is, she is the judge.

 

[Couchpotato]

Another win for the good guys.

Yes denying evidence to a defendant is the side of the “good guys”.…..