Climate alarmist declares that, 'There's no way to solve the climate crisis without ending capitalism'

[marvin martian]

"So weird how the ultimate solution to racism, sexism, homophobia, and climate change always comes down to destroying America.

Almost as if they’re all the same group with the same goal and it’s not the goal they publicize"

now now, we need to re-imagine and re-make capitalism because our world is on fire because of the current system

Climate alarmist declares that, 'There's no way to solve the climate crisis without ending capitalism' | Blaze Media

People around the globe continue to promote climate alarmism, warning that the world must act to avert a supposed crisis. And in some cases, proponents of this ideology openly advocate for the redistribution of wealth and the end of capitalism."There's no way to solve the climate crisis without...

www.theblaze.com

That's always been the goal of the left, in every endeavor. Killing capitalism, and more importantly, killing capitalists, is the ultimate goal of the left throughout history.

 

[22lcidw]

There may be Capitalism, but just not that much leeway in what people earn and receive in benefits. With not much leeway in work shortages or strikes. The authoritarian government will keep the population in line.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Nope it's about science

What was the Temperature in what is now Dallas Texas, Kiev Ukraine, Duban South Africa and Sydney Australia along with both poles on today's date, 500, 1,00, 5,000, and 10,000. years ago?

 

[Vegasgiants]

What was the Temperature in what is now Dallas Texas, Kiev Ukraine, Duban South Africa and Sydney Australia along with both poles on today's date, 500, 1,00, 5,000, and 10,000. years ago?

That information is not relevant to this debate

 

[Big Bend Texas]

They are the same thing. Lol

No, they really aren't. The only thing consistent about our climate is that it has constantly been changing since the planet first began to cool about 4Bn years ago.

 

[elektra]

The science says the solution is to build. To manufacture, to build more, and more, and more, The democrats must use the most money, building the most, covering all the land, with more and more and more and more, they can never stop, they must go on and on, run on, run on forever, covering the earth with more material ever manufactured, more oil is being used building green, more fossil fuels are being used, more and more, it runs on forever, out of control, consuming land and natural resources, leaving a trail of debris and toxic waste, cutting down the trees, destroying farmland, using water where they are almost out, build build build build

 

[Big Bend Texas]

That information is not relevant to this debate

Of course it is, how else do you determine we're somehow outside of the normal bounds for temperatures over a long period of time if you can't establish what they temperatures were over a long period of time?

 

[Vegasgiants]

No, they really aren't. The only thing consistent about our climate is that it has constantly been changing since the planet first began to cool about 4Bn years ago.

And now we know it is due to AGW

 

[Big Bend Texas]

The science says the solution is to build. To manufacture, to build more, and more, and more, The democrats must use the most money, building the most, covering all the land, with more and more and more and more, they can never stop, they must go on and on, run on, run on forever, covering the earth with more material ever manufactured, more oil is being used building green, more fossil fuels are being used, more and more, it runs on forever, out of control, consuming land and natural resources, leaving a trail of debris and toxic waste, cutting down the trees, destroying farmland, using water where they are almost out, build build build build

That's because people tend to get really upset when you start discussing the real problem which is exponential population growth.

 

[Vegasgiants]

Of course it is, how else do you determine we're somehow outside of the normal bounds for temperatures over a long period of time if you can't establish what they temperatures were over a long period of time?

You certainly dont need the information of the temperature on a single day in the past

 

[Big Bend Texas]

And now we know it is due to AGW

You can't know that unless you know what the temperatures actually were over a long period of time.

The only real data set they have to work with started with the satellite era when NASA satellites started sampling a large part of the planet regularly.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

That's because people tend to get really upset when you start discussing the real problem which is exponential population growth.

You certainly dont need the information of the temperature on a single day in the past

You do if you're going to make the claim we're outside the bounds of the norm and that man is responsible.

 

[Vegasgiants]

You can't know that unless you know what the temperatures actually were over a long period of time.

The only real data set they have to work with started with the satellite era when NASA satellites started sampling a large part of the planet regularly.

Not true. You can track the rapid rate of increase and determine its cause today

 

[Vegasgiants]

You do if you're going to make the claim we're outside the bounds of the norm and that man is responsible.

Name a scientific group that agrees with that premise

 

[ColonelAngus]

Nope

Sure they do. They sure as hell do not believe the seas will rise. Obama has 2 very expensive ocean front properties. He doesnt think they will be unnderwater in 5 years.

If it was not a hoax, these frauds would be going after China.

 

[Vegasgiants]

Sure they do. They sure as hell do not believe the seas will rise. Obama has 2 very expensive ocean front properties. He doesnt think they will be unnderwater in 5 years.

If it was not a hoax, these frauds would be going after China.

That is hilarious

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Not true. You can track the rapid rate of increase and determine its cause today

No you can't if you aren't looking at longer spans of times and particularly those that were even warmer than today.

 

[Vegasgiants]

No you can't if you aren't looking at longer spans of times and particularly those that were even warmer than today.

Then tell me who agrees with your premise

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Name a scientific group that agrees with that premise

I'm not going to play fetch for you all day but here's a decent article on the subject.

MITCHELL: Man-made global warming: defying science | The North State Journal

This is the sixth in our continuing series of articles demonstrating the fallacy of man-made, or “anthropogenic,” global warming (“AGW” for short). The previous article in this series exposed the raison d'être for the Paris Climate Accord: the lucrative business of trading carbon credits. In this a

nsjonline.com

Their whole premise violates the very most basic tenets of Scientific Inquiry.

You can't even form a good hypothesis without good data nor can you show what they variances would be absent human related causes.

 

[Vegasgiants]

I'm not going to play fetch for you all day but here's a decent article on the subject.

MITCHELL: Man-made global warming: defying science | The North State Journal

This is the sixth in our continuing series of articles demonstrating the fallacy of man-made, or “anthropogenic,” global warming (“AGW” for short). The previous article in this series exposed the raison d'être for the Paris Climate Accord: the lucrative business of trading carbon credits. In this a

nsjonline.com

Their whole premise violates the very most basic tenets of Scientific Inquiry.

You can't even form a good hypothesis without good data nor can you show what they variances would be absent human related causes.

They have great data

Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.

climate.nasa.gov