Climate is not the disaster. Calling it consensus is the disaster.

[Robert W]

Here is an excellent education about this topic. Scientists met to discuss this topic. And they had speakers who were not scientists. So learn from a non scientist.

 

[Leweman]

Consensus means the government took away the ability to be accurate. Only allowed to be in agreement with the government or lose your funding.

 

[expat_panama]

Here is an excellent education about this topic. Scientists met to discuss this topic. And they had speakers who were not scientists. So learn from a non scientist.

Your panel had a blurb that was embedded:

That's from the U.N., part of a longer dialogue that states that the human caused greenhouse raised the temp of the "globe" by 1.5C since the 1800's. This is ridiculous considering that there simply is not enough heat energy coming from the sun to heat the Earth 1.5C in just 150 years.

Climate change is a doomed group-think, like lemmings marching to the sea.

 

[Robert W]

Your panel had a blurb that was embedded:

View attachment 971742
That's from the U.N., part of a longer dialogue that states that the human caused greenhouse raised the temp of the "globe" by 1.5C since the 1800's. This is ridiculous considering that there simply is not enough heat energy coming from the sun to heat the Earth 1.5C in just 150 years.

Climate change is a doomed group-think, like lemmings marching to the sea.

Correct in your points., That blurb was inserted by the non scientific YouTube people.

 

[expat_panama]

Correct in your points., That blurb was inserted by the non scientific YouTube people.

Perhaps my error was my allowing an ambiguity.

My first statement was that the blurb was embedded. No argument there. The second statement was that it was from the U.N.. That could be misleading as it suggested that the U.N. did the embedding which was not true. It was the YouTube morons that did the embedding after they got it originally from the ill informed hapless ones at the U.N.

 

[ding]

They achieve consensus by not including dissenting opinions.
They achieve consensus by dismissing dissenting opinions.
They achieve consensus by ridiculing dissenting opinions.

That's not science. That's politics.

 

[Robert W]

Here a professor explains dissent.