Clinton campaign trying to get moderators to fact check Trump DURING debate.

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, it was. And Holt will correct Trump.

He will damage his career if he does. Trump will slam him in front of 100 million people.

Nope, Holt will rip Trump a new asshole just like Obama did in 2011 at the press conference.

 

[rightwinger]

It was a great speech and of course he said it was an act of terror. Why even mention the a-hole terrorists?

Remarks by the President on the Deaths of U.S. Embassy Staff in Libya
Rose Garden

10:43 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Every day, all across the world, American diplomats and civilians work tirelessly to advance the interests and values of our nation. Often, they are away from their families. Sometimes, they brave great danger.

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi. Among those killed was our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith. We are still notifying the families of the others who were killed. And today, the American people stand united in holding the families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

It's especially tragic that Chris Stevens died in Benghazi because it is a city that he helped to save. At the height of the Libyan revolution, Chris led our diplomatic post in Benghazi. With characteristic skill, courage, and resolve, he built partnerships with Libyan revolutionaries, and helped them as they planned to build a new Libya. When the Qaddafi regime came to an end, Chris was there to serve as our ambassador to the new Libya, and he worked tirelessly to support this young democracy, and I think both Secretary Clinton and I relied deeply on his knowledge of the situation on the ground there. He was a role model to all who worked with him and to the young diplomats who aspire to walk in his footsteps.

Along with his colleagues, Chris died in a country that is still striving to emerge from the recent experience of war. Today, the loss of these four Americans is fresh, but our memories of them linger on. I have no doubt that their legacy will live on through the work that they did far from our shores and in the hearts of those who love them back home.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers. These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity. They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.

We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better world for all of our children.

Thank you. May God bless the memory of those we lost and may God bless the United States of America.

END
10:48 A.M. EDT

An act of terror isn't the same thing as terrorism. An act of terror can be over anything, a jilted lover or in the case the pretense that they were angered over a video. The guy is homeless now, they ruined his life. obama sent Susan Rice around to every talking head show to tell Americans it was the video, not terrorism that spurred the attack. The reason being it was close to the election and they were presenting the false image that obama had it under control and things were better with him in charge.

So if he thought it was terrorism he lied to us for personal gain.

You say Tom-A-Toe, I say Tom-AH-Toe

 

[rightwinger]

Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump

Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel. They fuck with Trump he will stop being nice and start point out EVERY lie she tells and we can drag this into an all out war on live tv You want to "fact check" people do it after the debate and bring it up in the next debate.

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

 

[bripat9643]

Yup, it was. And Holt will correct Trump.

He will damage his career if he does. Trump will slam him in front of 100 million people.

Nope, Holt will rip Trump a new asshole just like Obama did in 2011 at the press conference.

Obama ripped Trump a new asshole in 2011?

You're babbling nonsense, Fakey.

Nothing unusual for you, however.

 

[rightwinger]

Yup, it was. And Holt will correct Trump.

He will damage his career if he does. Trump will slam him in front of 100 million people.

Nope, Holt will rip Trump a new asshole just like Obama did in 2011 at the press conference.

Obama ripped Trump a new asshole in 2011?

You're babbling nonsense, Fakey.

Nothing unusual for you, however.

Are you nitpicking that it was 2012 Obama ripped Trump a new asshole?
That was funny watching Trump just sit there and fume......
Especially the Obama birth video

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump

Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel. They fuck with Trump he will stop being nice and start point out EVERY lie she tells and we can drag this into an all out war on live tv You want to "fact check" people do it after the debate and bring it up in the next debate.

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

 

[JakeStarkey]

 

[rightwinger]

Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump

Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel. They fuck with Trump he will stop being nice and start point out EVERY lie she tells and we can drag this into an all out war on live tv You want to "fact check" people do it after the debate and bring it up in the next debate.

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

Of course moderators are not there to choose sides

They are there representing the American public to ensure that the questions are answered accurately. If the candidate answers something other than what was asked or provides information that is not correct, a follow-up question should be asked

 

[rightwinger]

Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump

Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel. They fuck with Trump he will stop being nice and start point out EVERY lie she tells and we can drag this into an all out war on live tv You want to "fact check" people do it after the debate and bring it up in the next debate.

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

Of course not...they represent the public

They are there to keep the candidate from bobbing, weaving and LYING

 

[bripat9643]

Yup, it was. And Holt will correct Trump.

He will damage his career if he does. Trump will slam him in front of 100 million people.

Nope, Holt will rip Trump a new asshole just like Obama did in 2011 at the press conference.

Obama ripped Trump a new asshole in 2011?

You're babbling nonsense, Fakey.

Nothing unusual for you, however.

Are you nitpicking that it was 2012 Obama ripped Trump a new asshole?
That was funny watching Trump just sit there and fume......
Especially the Obama birth video

Please quote where Obama "ripped Trump a new asshole."

 

[bripat9643]

Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump

Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel. They fuck with Trump he will stop being nice and start point out EVERY lie she tells and we can drag this into an all out war on live tv You want to "fact check" people do it after the debate and bring it up in the next debate.

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

Of course not...they represent the public

They are there to keep the candidate from bobbing, weaving and LYING

They don't represent anyone but themselves. They are leftwing douche bags. One thing you need to keep in mind is that only Hillary butthole suckers believe they are impartial. The rest of us know they are in the tank for Hillary.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, it was. And Holt will correct Trump.

He will damage his career if he does. Trump will slam him in front of 100 million people.

Nope, Holt will rip Trump a new asshole just like Obama did in 2011 at the press conference.

Obama ripped Trump a new asshole in 2011?

You're babbling nonsense, Fakey.

Nothing unusual for you, however.

Are you nitpicking that it was 2012 Obama ripped Trump a new asshole?
That was funny watching Trump just sit there and fume......
Especially the Obama birth video

Please quote where Obama "ripped Trump a new asshole."

So you admit he did. You had trouble, big trouble, with the vid. I knew you would.

 

[bripat9643]

Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump

Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel. They fuck with Trump he will stop being nice and start point out EVERY lie she tells and we can drag this into an all out war on live tv You want to "fact check" people do it after the debate and bring it up in the next debate.

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

Of course moderators are not there to choose sides

Nevertheless, that's exactly what they do. They have even admitted as much.

They are there representing the American public to ensure that the questions are answered accurately. If the candidate answers something other than what was asked or provides information that is not correct, a follow-up question should be asked

That's leftwing propaganda, not fact. Douche bags like you will never admit the truth because propaganda doesn't work when people know it's propaganda.

 

[rightwinger]

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

Of course moderators are not there to choose sides

Nevertheless, that's exactly what they do. They have even admitted as much.

They are there representing the American public to ensure that the questions are answered accurately. If the candidate answers something other than what was asked or provides information that is not correct, a follow-up question should be asked

That's leftwing propaganda, not fact. Douche bags like you will never admit the truth because propaganda doesn't work when people know it's propaganda.

Demanding the truth is now "leftwing propaganda"?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right and the alt right always try to rewrite the facts.

 

[bripat9643]

He will damage his career if he does. Trump will slam him in front of 100 million people.

Nope, Holt will rip Trump a new asshole just like Obama did in 2011 at the press conference.

Obama ripped Trump a new asshole in 2011?

You're babbling nonsense, Fakey.

Nothing unusual for you, however.

Are you nitpicking that it was 2012 Obama ripped Trump a new asshole?
That was funny watching Trump just sit there and fume......
Especially the Obama birth video

Please quote where Obama "ripped Trump a new asshole."

So you admit he did. You had trouble, big trouble, with the vid. I knew you would.

I asked a question, dumbass. I "admitted" nothing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, Holt will rip Trump a new asshole just like Obama did in 2011 at the press conference.

Obama ripped Trump a new asshole in 2011?

You're babbling nonsense, Fakey.

Nothing unusual for you, however.

Are you nitpicking that it was 2012 Obama ripped Trump a new asshole?
That was funny watching Trump just sit there and fume......
Especially the Obama birth video

Please quote where Obama "ripped Trump a new asshole."

So you admit he did. You had trouble, big trouble, with the vid. I knew you would.

I asked a question, dumbass. I "admitted" nothing.

Your supposed question was your admission, bripat.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

Of course moderators are not there to choose sides

Nevertheless, that's exactly what they do. They have even admitted as much.

They are there representing the American public to ensure that the questions are answered accurately. If the candidate answers something other than what was asked or provides information that is not correct, a follow-up question should be asked

That's leftwing propaganda, not fact. Douche bags like you will never admit the truth because propaganda doesn't work when people know it's propaganda.

Demanding the truth is now "leftwing propaganda"?

Claiming you demand the truth is "leftwing propaganda." Leftists lie. Nothing they say can be taken at face value. Nothing. They are all sleazy lying douche bags.

 

[bripat9643]

Obama ripped Trump a new asshole in 2011?

You're babbling nonsense, Fakey.

Nothing unusual for you, however.

Are you nitpicking that it was 2012 Obama ripped Trump a new asshole?
That was funny watching Trump just sit there and fume......
Especially the Obama birth video

Please quote where Obama "ripped Trump a new asshole."

So you admit he did. You had trouble, big trouble, with the vid. I knew you would.

I asked a question, dumbass. I "admitted" nothing.

Your supposed question was your admission, bripat.

Your Alzheimer's is in the final stage, Fakey.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump

Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel. They fuck with Trump he will stop being nice and start point out EVERY lie she tells and we can drag this into an all out war on live tv You want to "fact check" people do it after the debate and bring it up in the next debate.

They both should be fact checked during the debate. What the hell is wrong with that?

Yes but I think the moderator should stick with the questions and let the commentators do the fact checking.

A moderator should ensure that questions are being answered

That includes dodging a question and providing inaccurate information

Politicians dodge, weave, bob, lie and provide inaccuracies daily.

Nothing new.

Moderators are not there to choose sides.

Of course moderators are not there to choose sides

They are there representing the American public to ensure that the questions are answered accurately. If the candidate answers something other than what was asked or provides information that is not correct, a follow-up question should be asked

That I can accept.